Cargando…

Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()

Performance of cows and calves during 63-d early or conventional weaning periods was evaluated. Spring-calving beef cows (n = 167) of similar age, body condition score (BCS), and body weight (BW = 599 ± 54.5 kg), and their calves (initial BW = 204 ± 26.7 kg; 153 ± 15 d of age) were assigned randomly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaeger, John R, Preedy, Garrett W, Waggoner, Justin W, Harmoney, Keith R, Olson, K C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac052
_version_ 1784718018662629376
author Jaeger, John R
Preedy, Garrett W
Waggoner, Justin W
Harmoney, Keith R
Olson, K C
author_facet Jaeger, John R
Preedy, Garrett W
Waggoner, Justin W
Harmoney, Keith R
Olson, K C
author_sort Jaeger, John R
collection PubMed
description Performance of cows and calves during 63-d early or conventional weaning periods was evaluated. Spring-calving beef cows (n = 167) of similar age, body condition score (BCS), and body weight (BW = 599 ± 54.5 kg), and their calves (initial BW = 204 ± 26.7 kg; 153 ± 15 d of age) were assigned randomly to 1 of 4 weaning treatments: weaning at 153 d of age followed by 56 days of limit feeding in confinement (E-D), confinement of cow and calf for a 56-d period of limit feeding followed by weaning at 209 d of age (C-D), weaning at 153 d of age followed by a 56-d grazing period (E-P), and a 56-d grazing period for both cow and calf followed by weaning at 209 d of age (C-P). Cows and calves assigned to pasture treatments grazed native range pastures without supplement. Cows and calves assigned to drylot treatments were fed complete diets. Calves assigned to E-D were fed a concentrate-based diet at 2.5% of BW, whereas cows assigned to E-D were fed a forage-based diet at 1.6% of BW. Cows assigned to C-D were offered the diet fed to E-D cows at 2.0% of BW. Calf average daily gain (ADG) was influenced by diet and weaning treatments (diet × weaning, P ≤ 0.03). Cows and calves assigned to all treatments were limit fed common diets for 7 d at the end of our study to equalize gut fill. In general, calves managed in confinement and fed concentrate-based diets (i.e., E-D and C-D) had greater ADG than non-supplemented calves maintained on pasture (i.e., E-P and C-P). Cow BW and BCS change (days 0 to 63) were influenced by both diet and weaning status (P ≤ 0.05). Non-lactating cows maintained on pasture had lesser BW loss than other treatments, whereas non-lactating cows fed in confinement had lesser BCS on day 63 and greater BCS loss from days 0 to 63 than other treatments. Conversely, rump-fat depth on day 63 was greater (P < 0.01) for non-lactating cows maintained on pasture than for lactating cows in either pasture or drylot environments. Similarly, change in rump-fat depth was greatest (diet × weaning, P < 0.01) for non-lactating cows on pasture and least for lactating cows in either pasture or drylot environments. Results were interpreted to indicate that early-weaning spared cow BW and rump fat compared to weaning at conventional ages. Performance of cows appeared to be similar when limit-fed under drylot conditions or maintained in a pasture environment. Conversely, calf performance was generally greater in confinement than on pasture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9154347
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91543472022-06-04 Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments() Jaeger, John R Preedy, Garrett W Waggoner, Justin W Harmoney, Keith R Olson, K C Transl Anim Sci Ruminant Nutrition Performance of cows and calves during 63-d early or conventional weaning periods was evaluated. Spring-calving beef cows (n = 167) of similar age, body condition score (BCS), and body weight (BW = 599 ± 54.5 kg), and their calves (initial BW = 204 ± 26.7 kg; 153 ± 15 d of age) were assigned randomly to 1 of 4 weaning treatments: weaning at 153 d of age followed by 56 days of limit feeding in confinement (E-D), confinement of cow and calf for a 56-d period of limit feeding followed by weaning at 209 d of age (C-D), weaning at 153 d of age followed by a 56-d grazing period (E-P), and a 56-d grazing period for both cow and calf followed by weaning at 209 d of age (C-P). Cows and calves assigned to pasture treatments grazed native range pastures without supplement. Cows and calves assigned to drylot treatments were fed complete diets. Calves assigned to E-D were fed a concentrate-based diet at 2.5% of BW, whereas cows assigned to E-D were fed a forage-based diet at 1.6% of BW. Cows assigned to C-D were offered the diet fed to E-D cows at 2.0% of BW. Calf average daily gain (ADG) was influenced by diet and weaning treatments (diet × weaning, P ≤ 0.03). Cows and calves assigned to all treatments were limit fed common diets for 7 d at the end of our study to equalize gut fill. In general, calves managed in confinement and fed concentrate-based diets (i.e., E-D and C-D) had greater ADG than non-supplemented calves maintained on pasture (i.e., E-P and C-P). Cow BW and BCS change (days 0 to 63) were influenced by both diet and weaning status (P ≤ 0.05). Non-lactating cows maintained on pasture had lesser BW loss than other treatments, whereas non-lactating cows fed in confinement had lesser BCS on day 63 and greater BCS loss from days 0 to 63 than other treatments. Conversely, rump-fat depth on day 63 was greater (P < 0.01) for non-lactating cows maintained on pasture than for lactating cows in either pasture or drylot environments. Similarly, change in rump-fat depth was greatest (diet × weaning, P < 0.01) for non-lactating cows on pasture and least for lactating cows in either pasture or drylot environments. Results were interpreted to indicate that early-weaning spared cow BW and rump fat compared to weaning at conventional ages. Performance of cows appeared to be similar when limit-fed under drylot conditions or maintained in a pasture environment. Conversely, calf performance was generally greater in confinement than on pasture. Oxford University Press 2022-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9154347/ /pubmed/35663615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac052 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ruminant Nutrition
Jaeger, John R
Preedy, Garrett W
Waggoner, Justin W
Harmoney, Keith R
Olson, K C
Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()
title Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()
title_full Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()
title_fullStr Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()
title_full_unstemmed Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()
title_short Effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()
title_sort effects of early or conventional weaning on beef cow and calf performance in pasture or drylot environments()
topic Ruminant Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9154347/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663615
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txac052
work_keys_str_mv AT jaegerjohnr effectsofearlyorconventionalweaningonbeefcowandcalfperformanceinpastureordrylotenvironments
AT preedygarrettw effectsofearlyorconventionalweaningonbeefcowandcalfperformanceinpastureordrylotenvironments
AT waggonerjustinw effectsofearlyorconventionalweaningonbeefcowandcalfperformanceinpastureordrylotenvironments
AT harmoneykeithr effectsofearlyorconventionalweaningonbeefcowandcalfperformanceinpastureordrylotenvironments
AT olsonkc effectsofearlyorconventionalweaningonbeefcowandcalfperformanceinpastureordrylotenvironments