Cargando…
Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
BACKGROUND: Relational continuity, ‘a therapeutic relationship between a patient and provider/s that spans health care events’, has been associated with improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an intervention incorporating patient enrolment and a funding model for higher-risk pati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab157 |
_version_ | 1784718182983925760 |
---|---|
author | Bonney, Andrew Russell, Grant Radford, Jan Zwar, Nicholas Mullan, Judy Batterham, Marijka Mazza, Danielle Peterson, Gregory Eckermann, Simon Metusela, Christine |
author_facet | Bonney, Andrew Russell, Grant Radford, Jan Zwar, Nicholas Mullan, Judy Batterham, Marijka Mazza, Danielle Peterson, Gregory Eckermann, Simon Metusela, Christine |
author_sort | Bonney, Andrew |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Relational continuity, ‘a therapeutic relationship between a patient and provider/s that spans health care events’, has been associated with improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an intervention incorporating patient enrolment and a funding model for higher-risk patients influenced patient-reported experience measures, particularly relational continuity. METHODS: Cluster-randomized controlled trial over 12 months (1 August 2018–31 July 2019). Participating patients within intervention practices were offered enrolment with a preferred general practitioner, a minimum of 3 longer appointments, and review within 7 days of hospital admission or emergency department attendance. Intervention practices received incentives for longer consultations (dependent on reducing unnecessary prescriptions and tests), early post-hospital follow-up, and hospitalization reductions. The primary outcome was patient-reported relational continuity, measured by the Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form. RESULTS: A total of 774 patients, aged 18–65 years with a chronic illness or aged over 65 years, from 34 general practices in metropolitan, regional, and rural Australia across 3 states participated. Response rates for questionnaires were >90%. From a maximum of 4.0, mean baseline scores for relational continuity were 3.38 (SE 0.05) and 3.42 (SE 0.05) in control and intervention arms, respectively, with no significant between-group differences in changes pre-post trial. There were no significant changes in other patient-focussed measures. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported relational continuity was high at baseline and not influenced by the intervention, signalling the need for caution with policies incorporating patient enrolment and financial incentives. Further research is required targeting at-risk patient groups with low baseline engagement with primary care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9155154 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91551542022-06-04 Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience Bonney, Andrew Russell, Grant Radford, Jan Zwar, Nicholas Mullan, Judy Batterham, Marijka Mazza, Danielle Peterson, Gregory Eckermann, Simon Metusela, Christine Fam Pract Health Service Research BACKGROUND: Relational continuity, ‘a therapeutic relationship between a patient and provider/s that spans health care events’, has been associated with improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an intervention incorporating patient enrolment and a funding model for higher-risk patients influenced patient-reported experience measures, particularly relational continuity. METHODS: Cluster-randomized controlled trial over 12 months (1 August 2018–31 July 2019). Participating patients within intervention practices were offered enrolment with a preferred general practitioner, a minimum of 3 longer appointments, and review within 7 days of hospital admission or emergency department attendance. Intervention practices received incentives for longer consultations (dependent on reducing unnecessary prescriptions and tests), early post-hospital follow-up, and hospitalization reductions. The primary outcome was patient-reported relational continuity, measured by the Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form. RESULTS: A total of 774 patients, aged 18–65 years with a chronic illness or aged over 65 years, from 34 general practices in metropolitan, regional, and rural Australia across 3 states participated. Response rates for questionnaires were >90%. From a maximum of 4.0, mean baseline scores for relational continuity were 3.38 (SE 0.05) and 3.42 (SE 0.05) in control and intervention arms, respectively, with no significant between-group differences in changes pre-post trial. There were no significant changes in other patient-focussed measures. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported relational continuity was high at baseline and not influenced by the intervention, signalling the need for caution with policies incorporating patient enrolment and financial incentives. Further research is required targeting at-risk patient groups with low baseline engagement with primary care. Oxford University Press 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9155154/ /pubmed/35640205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab157 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Health Service Research Bonney, Andrew Russell, Grant Radford, Jan Zwar, Nicholas Mullan, Judy Batterham, Marijka Mazza, Danielle Peterson, Gregory Eckermann, Simon Metusela, Christine Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience |
title | Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience |
title_full | Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience |
title_short | Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience |
title_sort | effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (equip-gp) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience |
topic | Health Service Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155154/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab157 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bonneyandrew effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT russellgrant effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT radfordjan effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT zwarnicholas effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT mullanjudy effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT batterhammarijka effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT mazzadanielle effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT petersongregory effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT eckermannsimon effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience AT metuselachristine effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience |