Cargando…

Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience

BACKGROUND: Relational continuity, ‘a therapeutic relationship between a patient and provider/s that spans health care events’, has been associated with improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an intervention incorporating patient enrolment and a funding model for higher-risk pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bonney, Andrew, Russell, Grant, Radford, Jan, Zwar, Nicholas, Mullan, Judy, Batterham, Marijka, Mazza, Danielle, Peterson, Gregory, Eckermann, Simon, Metusela, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab157
_version_ 1784718182983925760
author Bonney, Andrew
Russell, Grant
Radford, Jan
Zwar, Nicholas
Mullan, Judy
Batterham, Marijka
Mazza, Danielle
Peterson, Gregory
Eckermann, Simon
Metusela, Christine
author_facet Bonney, Andrew
Russell, Grant
Radford, Jan
Zwar, Nicholas
Mullan, Judy
Batterham, Marijka
Mazza, Danielle
Peterson, Gregory
Eckermann, Simon
Metusela, Christine
author_sort Bonney, Andrew
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Relational continuity, ‘a therapeutic relationship between a patient and provider/s that spans health care events’, has been associated with improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an intervention incorporating patient enrolment and a funding model for higher-risk patients influenced patient-reported experience measures, particularly relational continuity. METHODS: Cluster-randomized controlled trial over 12 months (1 August 2018–31 July 2019). Participating patients within intervention practices were offered enrolment with a preferred general practitioner, a minimum of 3 longer appointments, and review within 7 days of hospital admission or emergency department attendance. Intervention practices received incentives for longer consultations (dependent on reducing unnecessary prescriptions and tests), early post-hospital follow-up, and hospitalization reductions. The primary outcome was patient-reported relational continuity, measured by the Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form. RESULTS: A total of 774 patients, aged 18–65 years with a chronic illness or aged over 65 years, from 34 general practices in metropolitan, regional, and rural Australia across 3 states participated. Response rates for questionnaires were >90%. From a maximum of 4.0, mean baseline scores for relational continuity were 3.38 (SE 0.05) and 3.42 (SE 0.05) in control and intervention arms, respectively, with no significant between-group differences in changes pre-post trial. There were no significant changes in other patient-focussed measures. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported relational continuity was high at baseline and not influenced by the intervention, signalling the need for caution with policies incorporating patient enrolment and financial incentives. Further research is required targeting at-risk patient groups with low baseline engagement with primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9155154
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91551542022-06-04 Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience Bonney, Andrew Russell, Grant Radford, Jan Zwar, Nicholas Mullan, Judy Batterham, Marijka Mazza, Danielle Peterson, Gregory Eckermann, Simon Metusela, Christine Fam Pract Health Service Research BACKGROUND: Relational continuity, ‘a therapeutic relationship between a patient and provider/s that spans health care events’, has been associated with improved patient outcomes. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether an intervention incorporating patient enrolment and a funding model for higher-risk patients influenced patient-reported experience measures, particularly relational continuity. METHODS: Cluster-randomized controlled trial over 12 months (1 August 2018–31 July 2019). Participating patients within intervention practices were offered enrolment with a preferred general practitioner, a minimum of 3 longer appointments, and review within 7 days of hospital admission or emergency department attendance. Intervention practices received incentives for longer consultations (dependent on reducing unnecessary prescriptions and tests), early post-hospital follow-up, and hospitalization reductions. The primary outcome was patient-reported relational continuity, measured by the Primary Care Assessment Tool Short Form. RESULTS: A total of 774 patients, aged 18–65 years with a chronic illness or aged over 65 years, from 34 general practices in metropolitan, regional, and rural Australia across 3 states participated. Response rates for questionnaires were >90%. From a maximum of 4.0, mean baseline scores for relational continuity were 3.38 (SE 0.05) and 3.42 (SE 0.05) in control and intervention arms, respectively, with no significant between-group differences in changes pre-post trial. There were no significant changes in other patient-focussed measures. CONCLUSION: Patient-reported relational continuity was high at baseline and not influenced by the intervention, signalling the need for caution with policies incorporating patient enrolment and financial incentives. Further research is required targeting at-risk patient groups with low baseline engagement with primary care. Oxford University Press 2021-11-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9155154/ /pubmed/35640205 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab157 Text en © The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Health Service Research
Bonney, Andrew
Russell, Grant
Radford, Jan
Zwar, Nicholas
Mullan, Judy
Batterham, Marijka
Mazza, Danielle
Peterson, Gregory
Eckermann, Simon
Metusela, Christine
Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
title Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
title_full Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
title_short Effectiveness of Quality Incentive Payments in General Practice (EQuIP-GP) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
title_sort effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (equip-gp) cluster randomized trial: impact on patient-reported experience
topic Health Service Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155154/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640205
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmab157
work_keys_str_mv AT bonneyandrew effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT russellgrant effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT radfordjan effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT zwarnicholas effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT mullanjudy effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT batterhammarijka effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT mazzadanielle effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT petersongregory effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT eckermannsimon effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience
AT metuselachristine effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpclusterrandomizedtrialimpactonpatientreportedexperience