Cargando…

Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid

OBJECTIVES: To develop a robust phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method with a correctly set breakpoint for pretomanid (Pa), the most recently approved anti-tuberculosis drug. METHODS: The Becton Dickinson Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ (MGIT) system was used at six labora...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bateson, Anna, Ortiz Canseco, Julio, McHugh, Timothy D., Witney, Adam A., Feuerriegel, Silke, Merker, Matthias, Kohl, Thomas A., Utpatel, Christian, Niemann, Stefan, Andres, Sönke, Kranzer, Katharina, Maurer, Florian P, Ghodousi, Arash, Borroni, Emanuele, Cirillo, Daniela Maria, Wijkander, Maria, Toro, Juan C., Groenheit, Ramona, Werngren, Jim, Machado, Diana, Viveiros, Miguel, Warren, Robin M., Sirgel, Frederick, Dippenaar, Anzaan, Köser, Claudio U., Sun, Eugene, Timm, Juliano
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac070
_version_ 1784718273144684544
author Bateson, Anna
Ortiz Canseco, Julio
McHugh, Timothy D.
Witney, Adam A.
Feuerriegel, Silke
Merker, Matthias
Kohl, Thomas A.
Utpatel, Christian
Niemann, Stefan
Andres, Sönke
Kranzer, Katharina
Maurer, Florian P
Ghodousi, Arash
Borroni, Emanuele
Cirillo, Daniela Maria
Wijkander, Maria
Toro, Juan C.
Groenheit, Ramona
Werngren, Jim
Machado, Diana
Viveiros, Miguel
Warren, Robin M.
Sirgel, Frederick
Dippenaar, Anzaan
Köser, Claudio U.
Sun, Eugene
Timm, Juliano
author_facet Bateson, Anna
Ortiz Canseco, Julio
McHugh, Timothy D.
Witney, Adam A.
Feuerriegel, Silke
Merker, Matthias
Kohl, Thomas A.
Utpatel, Christian
Niemann, Stefan
Andres, Sönke
Kranzer, Katharina
Maurer, Florian P
Ghodousi, Arash
Borroni, Emanuele
Cirillo, Daniela Maria
Wijkander, Maria
Toro, Juan C.
Groenheit, Ramona
Werngren, Jim
Machado, Diana
Viveiros, Miguel
Warren, Robin M.
Sirgel, Frederick
Dippenaar, Anzaan
Köser, Claudio U.
Sun, Eugene
Timm, Juliano
author_sort Bateson, Anna
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To develop a robust phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method with a correctly set breakpoint for pretomanid (Pa), the most recently approved anti-tuberculosis drug. METHODS: The Becton Dickinson Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ (MGIT) system was used at six laboratories to determine the MICs of a phylogenetically diverse collection of 356 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to establish the epidemiological cut-off value for pretomanid. MICs were correlated with WGS data to study the genetic basis of differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid. RESULTS: We observed ancient differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid among various members of MTBC. Most notably, lineage 1 of M. tuberculosis, which is estimated to account for 28% of tuberculosis cases globally, was less susceptible than lineages 2, 3, 4 and 7 of M. tuberculosis, resulting in a 99th percentile of 2 mg/L for lineage 1 compared with 0.5 mg/L for the remaining M. tuberculosis lineages. Moreover, we observed that higher MICs (≥8 mg/L), which probably confer resistance, had recently evolved independently in six different M. tuberculosis strains. Unlike the aforementioned ancient differences in susceptibility, these recent differences were likely caused by mutations in the known pretomanid resistance genes. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these findings, the provisional critical concentration of 1 mg/L for MGIT set by EMA must be re-evaluated. More broadly, these findings underline the importance of considering the global diversity of MTBC during clinical development of drugs and when defining breakpoints for AST.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9155602
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91556022022-06-04 Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid Bateson, Anna Ortiz Canseco, Julio McHugh, Timothy D. Witney, Adam A. Feuerriegel, Silke Merker, Matthias Kohl, Thomas A. Utpatel, Christian Niemann, Stefan Andres, Sönke Kranzer, Katharina Maurer, Florian P Ghodousi, Arash Borroni, Emanuele Cirillo, Daniela Maria Wijkander, Maria Toro, Juan C. Groenheit, Ramona Werngren, Jim Machado, Diana Viveiros, Miguel Warren, Robin M. Sirgel, Frederick Dippenaar, Anzaan Köser, Claudio U. Sun, Eugene Timm, Juliano J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research OBJECTIVES: To develop a robust phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) method with a correctly set breakpoint for pretomanid (Pa), the most recently approved anti-tuberculosis drug. METHODS: The Becton Dickinson Mycobacterial Growth Indicator Tube™ (MGIT) system was used at six laboratories to determine the MICs of a phylogenetically diverse collection of 356 Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) strains to establish the epidemiological cut-off value for pretomanid. MICs were correlated with WGS data to study the genetic basis of differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid. RESULTS: We observed ancient differences in the susceptibility to pretomanid among various members of MTBC. Most notably, lineage 1 of M. tuberculosis, which is estimated to account for 28% of tuberculosis cases globally, was less susceptible than lineages 2, 3, 4 and 7 of M. tuberculosis, resulting in a 99th percentile of 2 mg/L for lineage 1 compared with 0.5 mg/L for the remaining M. tuberculosis lineages. Moreover, we observed that higher MICs (≥8 mg/L), which probably confer resistance, had recently evolved independently in six different M. tuberculosis strains. Unlike the aforementioned ancient differences in susceptibility, these recent differences were likely caused by mutations in the known pretomanid resistance genes. CONCLUSIONS: In light of these findings, the provisional critical concentration of 1 mg/L for MGIT set by EMA must be re-evaluated. More broadly, these findings underline the importance of considering the global diversity of MTBC during clinical development of drugs and when defining breakpoints for AST. Oxford University Press 2022-03-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9155602/ /pubmed/35260883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac070 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.
spellingShingle Original Research
Bateson, Anna
Ortiz Canseco, Julio
McHugh, Timothy D.
Witney, Adam A.
Feuerriegel, Silke
Merker, Matthias
Kohl, Thomas A.
Utpatel, Christian
Niemann, Stefan
Andres, Sönke
Kranzer, Katharina
Maurer, Florian P
Ghodousi, Arash
Borroni, Emanuele
Cirillo, Daniela Maria
Wijkander, Maria
Toro, Juan C.
Groenheit, Ramona
Werngren, Jim
Machado, Diana
Viveiros, Miguel
Warren, Robin M.
Sirgel, Frederick
Dippenaar, Anzaan
Köser, Claudio U.
Sun, Eugene
Timm, Juliano
Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid
title Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid
title_full Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid
title_fullStr Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid
title_full_unstemmed Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid
title_short Ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid
title_sort ancient and recent differences in the intrinsic susceptibility of mycobacterium tuberculosis complex to pretomanid
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155602/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35260883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkac070
work_keys_str_mv AT batesonanna ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT ortizcansecojulio ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT mchughtimothyd ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT witneyadama ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT feuerriegelsilke ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT merkermatthias ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT kohlthomasa ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT utpatelchristian ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT niemannstefan ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT andressonke ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT kranzerkatharina ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT maurerflorianp ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT ghodousiarash ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT borroniemanuele ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT cirillodanielamaria ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT wijkandermaria ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT torojuanc ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT groenheitramona ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT werngrenjim ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT machadodiana ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT viveirosmiguel ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT warrenrobinm ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT sirgelfrederick ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT dippenaaranzaan ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT koserclaudiou ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT suneugene ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid
AT timmjuliano ancientandrecentdifferencesintheintrinsicsusceptibilityofmycobacteriumtuberculosiscomplextopretomanid