Cargando…

Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system

BACKGROUND: Ever since 2020, travelling has become complex, and increasingly so as the COVID-19 pandemic continues. To reopen Europe safely, a consensus of travel measures has been agreed between countries to enable movement between countries with as few restrictions as possible. However, communicat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Blanford, Justine I, Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de, Schouten, Stephanie E, Friedrich, Alex W, Araújo-Soares, Vera
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taac006
_version_ 1784718358958047232
author Blanford, Justine I
Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de
Schouten, Stephanie E
Friedrich, Alex W
Araújo-Soares, Vera
author_facet Blanford, Justine I
Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de
Schouten, Stephanie E
Friedrich, Alex W
Araújo-Soares, Vera
author_sort Blanford, Justine I
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ever since 2020, travelling has become complex, and increasingly so as the COVID-19 pandemic continues. To reopen Europe safely, a consensus of travel measures has been agreed between countries to enable movement between countries with as few restrictions as possible. However, communication of these travel measures and requirements for entry are not always clear and easily available. The aim of this study was to assess the availability, accessibility and harmonization of current travel information available in Europe. METHODS: We performed a systematic documental analysis of online publicly available information and synthesized travel entry requirements for all countries in the European Union and Schengen Area (N = 31). For each country we assessed entry requirements, actions after entry, how risk was assessed, and how accessible the information was. RESULTS: We found varying measures implemented across Europe for entry and a range of exemptions and restrictions, some of which were consistent between countries. Information was not always easy to find taking on average 10 clicks to locate. Twenty-one countries required pre-travel forms to be completed. Forty apps were in use, 11 serving as digital certification checkers. All countries required some form of COVID-19 certification for entry with some exemptions (e.g. children). Nineteen percent (n = 6) of countries used the ECDC risk assessment system; 80% (n = 25) defined their own. Forty-eight percent (n = 15) of countries used a traffic-light system with 2–5 risk classifications. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive set of measures has been developed to enable continued safe travel in Europe. However further refinements and coordination is needed to align travel measures throughout the EU to minimize confusion and maximize adherence to requested measures. We recommend that, along with developing travel measures based on a common set of rules, a standard approach is taken to communicate what these measures are.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9155998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91559982022-06-04 Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system Blanford, Justine I Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de Schouten, Stephanie E Friedrich, Alex W Araújo-Soares, Vera J Travel Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Ever since 2020, travelling has become complex, and increasingly so as the COVID-19 pandemic continues. To reopen Europe safely, a consensus of travel measures has been agreed between countries to enable movement between countries with as few restrictions as possible. However, communication of these travel measures and requirements for entry are not always clear and easily available. The aim of this study was to assess the availability, accessibility and harmonization of current travel information available in Europe. METHODS: We performed a systematic documental analysis of online publicly available information and synthesized travel entry requirements for all countries in the European Union and Schengen Area (N = 31). For each country we assessed entry requirements, actions after entry, how risk was assessed, and how accessible the information was. RESULTS: We found varying measures implemented across Europe for entry and a range of exemptions and restrictions, some of which were consistent between countries. Information was not always easy to find taking on average 10 clicks to locate. Twenty-one countries required pre-travel forms to be completed. Forty apps were in use, 11 serving as digital certification checkers. All countries required some form of COVID-19 certification for entry with some exemptions (e.g. children). Nineteen percent (n = 6) of countries used the ECDC risk assessment system; 80% (n = 25) defined their own. Forty-eight percent (n = 15) of countries used a traffic-light system with 2–5 risk classifications. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive set of measures has been developed to enable continued safe travel in Europe. However further refinements and coordination is needed to align travel measures throughout the EU to minimize confusion and maximize adherence to requested measures. We recommend that, along with developing travel measures based on a common set of rules, a standard approach is taken to communicate what these measures are. Oxford University Press 2022-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9155998/ /pubmed/35134215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taac006 Text en © International Society of Travel Medicine 2022. Published by Oxford University Press. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Blanford, Justine I
Jong, Nienke Beerlage-de
Schouten, Stephanie E
Friedrich, Alex W
Araújo-Soares, Vera
Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system
title Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system
title_full Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system
title_fullStr Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system
title_full_unstemmed Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system
title_short Navigating travel in Europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system
title_sort navigating travel in europe during the pandemic: from mobile apps, certificates and quarantine to traffic-light system
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9155998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35134215
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taac006
work_keys_str_mv AT blanfordjustinei navigatingtravelineuropeduringthepandemicfrommobileappscertificatesandquarantinetotrafficlightsystem
AT jongnienkebeerlagede navigatingtravelineuropeduringthepandemicfrommobileappscertificatesandquarantinetotrafficlightsystem
AT schoutenstephaniee navigatingtravelineuropeduringthepandemicfrommobileappscertificatesandquarantinetotrafficlightsystem
AT friedrichalexw navigatingtravelineuropeduringthepandemicfrommobileappscertificatesandquarantinetotrafficlightsystem
AT araujosoaresvera navigatingtravelineuropeduringthepandemicfrommobileappscertificatesandquarantinetotrafficlightsystem