Cargando…

Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: The field of digital health has grown rapidly in part due to digital health tools’ potential to reduce health inequities. However, such potential has not always been realized. The design approaches used in digital health are one of the known aspects that have an impact on health equity....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Evans, Laura, Evans, Jay, Pagliari, Claudia, Källander, Karin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35579918
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34013
_version_ 1784718613878407168
author Evans, Laura
Evans, Jay
Pagliari, Claudia
Källander, Karin
author_facet Evans, Laura
Evans, Jay
Pagliari, Claudia
Källander, Karin
author_sort Evans, Laura
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The field of digital health has grown rapidly in part due to digital health tools’ potential to reduce health inequities. However, such potential has not always been realized. The design approaches used in digital health are one of the known aspects that have an impact on health equity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our scoping review will be to understand how design approaches in digital health have an impact on health equity. METHODS: A scoping review of studies that describe how design practices for digital health have an impact on health equity will be carried out. The scoping review will follow the methodologies laid out by Arksey and O’Malley, the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ACM Digital Library databases will be searched for peer-reviewed papers. The ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Global Index Medicus databases will be searched for gray literature. The results will be screened against our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the data extracted from the included studies will be analyzed. RESULTS: As of March 2022, a preliminary search of the peer-reviewed databases has yielded over 4900 studies, and more are anticipated when gray literature databases are searched. We expect that after duplicates are removed and screening is completed, a much smaller number of studies will meet all of our inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been much discussion about the importance of design for lowering barriers to digital health participation, the evidence base demonstrating its impacts on health equity is less obvious. We hope that our findings will contribute to a better understanding of the impact that design in digital health has on health equity and that these findings will translate into action that leads to stronger, more equitable health care systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9157315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91573152022-06-02 Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review Evans, Laura Evans, Jay Pagliari, Claudia Källander, Karin JMIR Res Protoc Protocol BACKGROUND: The field of digital health has grown rapidly in part due to digital health tools’ potential to reduce health inequities. However, such potential has not always been realized. The design approaches used in digital health are one of the known aspects that have an impact on health equity. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our scoping review will be to understand how design approaches in digital health have an impact on health equity. METHODS: A scoping review of studies that describe how design practices for digital health have an impact on health equity will be carried out. The scoping review will follow the methodologies laid out by Arksey and O’Malley, the Joanna Briggs Institute, and the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) checklist. The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and ACM Digital Library databases will be searched for peer-reviewed papers. The ProQuest Dissertations and Theses and Global Index Medicus databases will be searched for gray literature. The results will be screened against our inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subsequently, the data extracted from the included studies will be analyzed. RESULTS: As of March 2022, a preliminary search of the peer-reviewed databases has yielded over 4900 studies, and more are anticipated when gray literature databases are searched. We expect that after duplicates are removed and screening is completed, a much smaller number of studies will meet all of our inclusion criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been much discussion about the importance of design for lowering barriers to digital health participation, the evidence base demonstrating its impacts on health equity is less obvious. We hope that our findings will contribute to a better understanding of the impact that design in digital health has on health equity and that these findings will translate into action that leads to stronger, more equitable health care systems. JMIR Publications 2022-05-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9157315/ /pubmed/35579918 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34013 Text en ©Laura Evans, Jay Evans, Claudia Pagliari, Karin Källander. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 17.05.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Research Protocols, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://www.researchprotocols.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Protocol
Evans, Laura
Evans, Jay
Pagliari, Claudia
Källander, Karin
Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_full Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_fullStr Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_short Exploring the Equity Impact of Current Digital Health Design Practices: Protocol for a Scoping Review
title_sort exploring the equity impact of current digital health design practices: protocol for a scoping review
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35579918
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34013
work_keys_str_mv AT evanslaura exploringtheequityimpactofcurrentdigitalhealthdesignpracticesprotocolforascopingreview
AT evansjay exploringtheequityimpactofcurrentdigitalhealthdesignpracticesprotocolforascopingreview
AT pagliariclaudia exploringtheequityimpactofcurrentdigitalhealthdesignpracticesprotocolforascopingreview
AT kallanderkarin exploringtheequityimpactofcurrentdigitalhealthdesignpracticesprotocolforascopingreview