Cargando…
Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial
OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373 |
_version_ | 1784718617961562112 |
---|---|
author | Smith, Toby O Parsons, Scott Ooms, Alexander Dutton, Susan Fordham, Beth Garrett, Angela Hing, Caroline Lamb, Sarah |
author_facet | Smith, Toby O Parsons, Scott Ooms, Alexander Dutton, Susan Fordham, Beth Garrett, Angela Hing, Caroline Lamb, Sarah |
author_sort | Smith, Toby O |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: National Health Service providers in nine English hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 224 individuals aged ≥18 years, undergoing a primary THR or TKR deemed ‘moderately inactive’ or ‘inactive’. INTERVENTION: Participants received either six, 30 min, weekly, group-based exercise sessions (usual care) or the same six weekly, group-based, exercise sessions each preceded by a 30 min cognitive behaviour discussion group aimed at challenging barriers to physical inactivity following surgery (experimental). RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING: Initial 75 participants were randomised 1:1 before changing the allocation ratio to 2:1 (experimental:usual care). Allocation was based on minimisation, stratifying on comorbidities, operation type and hospital. There was no blinding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 12 months. Secondary: 6 and 12-month assessed function, pain, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 1254 participants assessed for eligibility, 224 were included (139 experimental: 85 usual care). Mean age was 68.4 years (SD: 8.7), 63% were women, 52% underwent TKR. There was no between-group difference in UCLA score (mean difference: −0.03 (95% CI −0.52 to 0.45, p=0.89)). There were no differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. There were no important adverse events in either group. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the reduced intended sample size (target 260) and reduced intervention compliance. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to suggest attending usual care physiotherapy sessions plus a group-based behaviour change intervention differs to attending usual care physiotherapy alone. As the trial could not reach its intended sample size, nor a proportion of participants receive their intended rehabilitation, this should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN29770908. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9157340 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91573402022-06-16 Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial Smith, Toby O Parsons, Scott Ooms, Alexander Dutton, Susan Fordham, Beth Garrett, Angela Hing, Caroline Lamb, Sarah BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: National Health Service providers in nine English hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 224 individuals aged ≥18 years, undergoing a primary THR or TKR deemed ‘moderately inactive’ or ‘inactive’. INTERVENTION: Participants received either six, 30 min, weekly, group-based exercise sessions (usual care) or the same six weekly, group-based, exercise sessions each preceded by a 30 min cognitive behaviour discussion group aimed at challenging barriers to physical inactivity following surgery (experimental). RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING: Initial 75 participants were randomised 1:1 before changing the allocation ratio to 2:1 (experimental:usual care). Allocation was based on minimisation, stratifying on comorbidities, operation type and hospital. There was no blinding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 12 months. Secondary: 6 and 12-month assessed function, pain, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 1254 participants assessed for eligibility, 224 were included (139 experimental: 85 usual care). Mean age was 68.4 years (SD: 8.7), 63% were women, 52% underwent TKR. There was no between-group difference in UCLA score (mean difference: −0.03 (95% CI −0.52 to 0.45, p=0.89)). There were no differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. There were no important adverse events in either group. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the reduced intended sample size (target 260) and reduced intervention compliance. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to suggest attending usual care physiotherapy sessions plus a group-based behaviour change intervention differs to attending usual care physiotherapy alone. As the trial could not reach its intended sample size, nor a proportion of participants receive their intended rehabilitation, this should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN29770908. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9157340/ /pubmed/35641012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Rehabilitation Medicine Smith, Toby O Parsons, Scott Ooms, Alexander Dutton, Susan Fordham, Beth Garrett, Angela Hing, Caroline Lamb, Sarah Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial |
title | Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial |
title_full | Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial |
title_fullStr | Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial |
title_short | Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial |
title_sort | randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the pep-talk trial |
topic | Rehabilitation Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157340/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT smithtobyo randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT parsonsscott randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT oomsalexander randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT duttonsusan randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT fordhambeth randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT garrettangela randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT hingcaroline randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT lambsarah randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial AT randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial |