Cargando…

Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, Toby O, Parsons, Scott, Ooms, Alexander, Dutton, Susan, Fordham, Beth, Garrett, Angela, Hing, Caroline, Lamb, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373
_version_ 1784718617961562112
author Smith, Toby O
Parsons, Scott
Ooms, Alexander
Dutton, Susan
Fordham, Beth
Garrett, Angela
Hing, Caroline
Lamb, Sarah
author_facet Smith, Toby O
Parsons, Scott
Ooms, Alexander
Dutton, Susan
Fordham, Beth
Garrett, Angela
Hing, Caroline
Lamb, Sarah
author_sort Smith, Toby O
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: National Health Service providers in nine English hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 224 individuals aged ≥18 years, undergoing a primary THR or TKR deemed ‘moderately inactive’ or ‘inactive’. INTERVENTION: Participants received either six, 30 min, weekly, group-based exercise sessions (usual care) or the same six weekly, group-based, exercise sessions each preceded by a 30 min cognitive behaviour discussion group aimed at challenging barriers to physical inactivity following surgery (experimental). RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING: Initial 75 participants were randomised 1:1 before changing the allocation ratio to 2:1 (experimental:usual care). Allocation was based on minimisation, stratifying on comorbidities, operation type and hospital. There was no blinding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 12 months. Secondary: 6 and 12-month assessed function, pain, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 1254 participants assessed for eligibility, 224 were included (139 experimental: 85 usual care). Mean age was 68.4 years (SD: 8.7), 63% were women, 52% underwent TKR. There was no between-group difference in UCLA score (mean difference: −0.03 (95% CI −0.52 to 0.45, p=0.89)). There were no differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. There were no important adverse events in either group. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the reduced intended sample size (target 260) and reduced intervention compliance. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to suggest attending usual care physiotherapy sessions plus a group-based behaviour change intervention differs to attending usual care physiotherapy alone. As the trial could not reach its intended sample size, nor a proportion of participants receive their intended rehabilitation, this should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN29770908.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9157340
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91573402022-06-16 Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial Smith, Toby O Parsons, Scott Ooms, Alexander Dutton, Susan Fordham, Beth Garrett, Angela Hing, Caroline Lamb, Sarah BMJ Open Rehabilitation Medicine OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR). DESIGN: Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority trial. SETTING: National Health Service providers in nine English hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 224 individuals aged ≥18 years, undergoing a primary THR or TKR deemed ‘moderately inactive’ or ‘inactive’. INTERVENTION: Participants received either six, 30 min, weekly, group-based exercise sessions (usual care) or the same six weekly, group-based, exercise sessions each preceded by a 30 min cognitive behaviour discussion group aimed at challenging barriers to physical inactivity following surgery (experimental). RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING: Initial 75 participants were randomised 1:1 before changing the allocation ratio to 2:1 (experimental:usual care). Allocation was based on minimisation, stratifying on comorbidities, operation type and hospital. There was no blinding. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 12 months. Secondary: 6 and 12-month assessed function, pain, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and quality of life. RESULTS: Of the 1254 participants assessed for eligibility, 224 were included (139 experimental: 85 usual care). Mean age was 68.4 years (SD: 8.7), 63% were women, 52% underwent TKR. There was no between-group difference in UCLA score (mean difference: −0.03 (95% CI −0.52 to 0.45, p=0.89)). There were no differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. There were no important adverse events in either group. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the reduced intended sample size (target 260) and reduced intervention compliance. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence to suggest attending usual care physiotherapy sessions plus a group-based behaviour change intervention differs to attending usual care physiotherapy alone. As the trial could not reach its intended sample size, nor a proportion of participants receive their intended rehabilitation, this should be interpreted with caution. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN29770908. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9157340/ /pubmed/35641012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Rehabilitation Medicine
Smith, Toby O
Parsons, Scott
Ooms, Alexander
Dutton, Susan
Fordham, Beth
Garrett, Angela
Hing, Caroline
Lamb, Sarah
Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial
title Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial
title_full Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial
title_fullStr Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial
title_full_unstemmed Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial
title_short Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial
title_sort randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the pep-talk trial
topic Rehabilitation Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157340/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373
work_keys_str_mv AT smithtobyo randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT parsonsscott randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT oomsalexander randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT duttonsusan randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT fordhambeth randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT garrettangela randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT hingcaroline randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT lambsarah randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial
AT randomisedcontrolledtrialofabehaviourchangephysiotherapyinterventiontoincreasephysicalactivityfollowinghipandkneereplacementthepeptalktrial