Cargando…

Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score

OBJECTIVE: To use echocardiographic and clinical features to develop an explainable clinical risk prediction model in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), including those with low-gradient AS (LGAS), using machine learning (ML). METHODS: In 1130 patients with moderate or severe AS, we used bootstrap...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Namasivayam, Mayooran, Myers, Paul D, Guttag, John V, Capoulade, Romain, Pibarot, Philippe, Picard, Michael H, Hung, Judy, Stultz, Collin M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-001990
_version_ 1784718626574565376
author Namasivayam, Mayooran
Myers, Paul D
Guttag, John V
Capoulade, Romain
Pibarot, Philippe
Picard, Michael H
Hung, Judy
Stultz, Collin M
author_facet Namasivayam, Mayooran
Myers, Paul D
Guttag, John V
Capoulade, Romain
Pibarot, Philippe
Picard, Michael H
Hung, Judy
Stultz, Collin M
author_sort Namasivayam, Mayooran
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To use echocardiographic and clinical features to develop an explainable clinical risk prediction model in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), including those with low-gradient AS (LGAS), using machine learning (ML). METHODS: In 1130 patients with moderate or severe AS, we used bootstrap lasso regression (BLR), an ML method, to identify echocardiographic and clinical features important for predicting the combined outcome of all-cause mortality or aortic valve replacement (AVR) within 5 years after the initial echocardiogram. A separate hold out set, from a different centre (n=540), was used to test the generality of the model. We also evaluated model performance with respect to each outcome separately and in different subgroups, including patients with LGAS. RESULTS: Out of 69 available variables, 26 features were identified as predictive by BLR and expert knowledge was used to further reduce this set to 9 easily available and input features without loss of efficacy. A ridge logistic regression model constructed using these features had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 for the combined outcome of mortality/AVR. The model reliably identified patients at high risk of death in years 2–5 (HRs ≥2.0, upper vs other quartiles, for years 2–5, p<0.05, p=not significant in year 1) and was also predictive in the cohort with LGAS (n=383, HRs≥3.3, p<0.05). The model performed similarly well in the independent hold out set (AUC 0.78, HR ≥2.5 in years 1–5, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In two separate longitudinal databases, ML identified prognostic features and produced an algorithm that predicts outcome for up to 5 years of follow-up in patients with AS, including patients with LGAS. Our algorithm, the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score, is available online for public use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9157386
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91573862022-06-16 Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score Namasivayam, Mayooran Myers, Paul D Guttag, John V Capoulade, Romain Pibarot, Philippe Picard, Michael H Hung, Judy Stultz, Collin M Open Heart Valvular Heart Disease OBJECTIVE: To use echocardiographic and clinical features to develop an explainable clinical risk prediction model in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), including those with low-gradient AS (LGAS), using machine learning (ML). METHODS: In 1130 patients with moderate or severe AS, we used bootstrap lasso regression (BLR), an ML method, to identify echocardiographic and clinical features important for predicting the combined outcome of all-cause mortality or aortic valve replacement (AVR) within 5 years after the initial echocardiogram. A separate hold out set, from a different centre (n=540), was used to test the generality of the model. We also evaluated model performance with respect to each outcome separately and in different subgroups, including patients with LGAS. RESULTS: Out of 69 available variables, 26 features were identified as predictive by BLR and expert knowledge was used to further reduce this set to 9 easily available and input features without loss of efficacy. A ridge logistic regression model constructed using these features had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.74 for the combined outcome of mortality/AVR. The model reliably identified patients at high risk of death in years 2–5 (HRs ≥2.0, upper vs other quartiles, for years 2–5, p<0.05, p=not significant in year 1) and was also predictive in the cohort with LGAS (n=383, HRs≥3.3, p<0.05). The model performed similarly well in the independent hold out set (AUC 0.78, HR ≥2.5 in years 1–5, p<0.05). CONCLUSION: In two separate longitudinal databases, ML identified prognostic features and produced an algorithm that predicts outcome for up to 5 years of follow-up in patients with AS, including patients with LGAS. Our algorithm, the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score, is available online for public use. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9157386/ /pubmed/35641101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-001990 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Valvular Heart Disease
Namasivayam, Mayooran
Myers, Paul D
Guttag, John V
Capoulade, Romain
Pibarot, Philippe
Picard, Michael H
Hung, Judy
Stultz, Collin M
Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score
title Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score
title_full Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score
title_fullStr Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score
title_full_unstemmed Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score
title_short Predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the Aortic Stenosis Risk (ASteRisk) score
title_sort predicting outcomes in patients with aortic stenosis using machine learning: the aortic stenosis risk (asterisk) score
topic Valvular Heart Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157386/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35641101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2022-001990
work_keys_str_mv AT namasivayammayooran predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore
AT myerspauld predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore
AT guttagjohnv predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore
AT capouladeromain predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore
AT pibarotphilippe predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore
AT picardmichaelh predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore
AT hungjudy predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore
AT stultzcollinm predictingoutcomesinpatientswithaorticstenosisusingmachinelearningtheaorticstenosisriskasteriskscore