Cargando…

Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis

INTRODUCTION: Non-operative antibiotic therapy is now considered as an alternative to surgery for acute appendicitis (AA). This is in part due to the reported surgical complication rates. We report a patient who developed wound infection and port site hernia following a laparoscopic appendectomy, an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeddeloh, Katie, Velji-Ibrahim, Jena, Stock, Emily, Bulander, Robert, Rickard, Jennifer, Harmon, James V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107235
_version_ 1784718643125288960
author Jeddeloh, Katie
Velji-Ibrahim, Jena
Stock, Emily
Bulander, Robert
Rickard, Jennifer
Harmon, James V.
author_facet Jeddeloh, Katie
Velji-Ibrahim, Jena
Stock, Emily
Bulander, Robert
Rickard, Jennifer
Harmon, James V.
author_sort Jeddeloh, Katie
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Non-operative antibiotic therapy is now considered as an alternative to surgery for acute appendicitis (AA). This is in part due to the reported surgical complication rates. We report a patient who developed wound infection and port site hernia following a laparoscopic appendectomy, analyze our post-operative wound infection rates, and discuss the treatment options for AA globally. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a 40-year-old woman who developed a wound infection and subsequent port site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and analyze surgical site infection (SSI) and readmission rates for patients who underwent LA at our medical center. Analysis of our surveillance data demonstrated that 15/865 (1.7%) patients developed SSIs and 7/15 (47%) of these patients had positive wound cultures. Patients who developed SSIs were more likely to be male (80% vs 20%; P = 0.03), be older (43.0 vs 34.0; P = 0.04), have higher surgical wound classification scores (66.7% vs 38.2%; P = 0.009), and have longer operative times (82 vs 62 min; P = 0.003). The overall readmission rate was 2.8%. DISCUSSION: We report a lower SSI rate after LA than usually reported. Surgical site infection following LA is rare and may be challenging to diagnose early. Additional complications such as port-site hernia may also be encountered in this setting. CONCLUSION: This data should inform both physicians and surgeons who must consider the expected complication rates associated with surgery for AA globally.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9157466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91574662022-06-02 Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis Jeddeloh, Katie Velji-Ibrahim, Jena Stock, Emily Bulander, Robert Rickard, Jennifer Harmon, James V. Int J Surg Case Rep Case Series INTRODUCTION: Non-operative antibiotic therapy is now considered as an alternative to surgery for acute appendicitis (AA). This is in part due to the reported surgical complication rates. We report a patient who developed wound infection and port site hernia following a laparoscopic appendectomy, analyze our post-operative wound infection rates, and discuss the treatment options for AA globally. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report a 40-year-old woman who developed a wound infection and subsequent port site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) and analyze surgical site infection (SSI) and readmission rates for patients who underwent LA at our medical center. Analysis of our surveillance data demonstrated that 15/865 (1.7%) patients developed SSIs and 7/15 (47%) of these patients had positive wound cultures. Patients who developed SSIs were more likely to be male (80% vs 20%; P = 0.03), be older (43.0 vs 34.0; P = 0.04), have higher surgical wound classification scores (66.7% vs 38.2%; P = 0.009), and have longer operative times (82 vs 62 min; P = 0.003). The overall readmission rate was 2.8%. DISCUSSION: We report a lower SSI rate after LA than usually reported. Surgical site infection following LA is rare and may be challenging to diagnose early. Additional complications such as port-site hernia may also be encountered in this setting. CONCLUSION: This data should inform both physicians and surgeons who must consider the expected complication rates associated with surgery for AA globally. Elsevier 2022-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9157466/ /pubmed/35636213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107235 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Case Series
Jeddeloh, Katie
Velji-Ibrahim, Jena
Stock, Emily
Bulander, Robert
Rickard, Jennifer
Harmon, James V.
Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis
title Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis
title_full Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis
title_fullStr Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis
title_full_unstemmed Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis
title_short Wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: A case report and surveillance data analysis
title_sort wound infection and subsequent port-site hernia following laparoscopic appendectomy: a case report and surveillance data analysis
topic Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35636213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijscr.2022.107235
work_keys_str_mv AT jeddelohkatie woundinfectionandsubsequentportsiteherniafollowinglaparoscopicappendectomyacasereportandsurveillancedataanalysis
AT veljiibrahimjena woundinfectionandsubsequentportsiteherniafollowinglaparoscopicappendectomyacasereportandsurveillancedataanalysis
AT stockemily woundinfectionandsubsequentportsiteherniafollowinglaparoscopicappendectomyacasereportandsurveillancedataanalysis
AT bulanderrobert woundinfectionandsubsequentportsiteherniafollowinglaparoscopicappendectomyacasereportandsurveillancedataanalysis
AT rickardjennifer woundinfectionandsubsequentportsiteherniafollowinglaparoscopicappendectomyacasereportandsurveillancedataanalysis
AT harmonjamesv woundinfectionandsubsequentportsiteherniafollowinglaparoscopicappendectomyacasereportandsurveillancedataanalysis