Cargando…

Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND: Coiling and stent-assisted coiling remain the first-line treatments for distal cerebral circulation aneurysms (DCCAs). The off-label use of the pipeline embolization device (PED) for these aneurysms has been explored recently but remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare traditional e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ma, Chao, Zhu, Haoyu, Liang, Shikai, Liang, Fei, Sun, Jidian, Zhang, Yupeng, Jiang, Chuhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.755122
_version_ 1784718647590125568
author Ma, Chao
Zhu, Haoyu
Liang, Shikai
Liang, Fei
Sun, Jidian
Zhang, Yupeng
Jiang, Chuhan
author_facet Ma, Chao
Zhu, Haoyu
Liang, Shikai
Liang, Fei
Sun, Jidian
Zhang, Yupeng
Jiang, Chuhan
author_sort Ma, Chao
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Coiling and stent-assisted coiling remain the first-line treatments for distal cerebral circulation aneurysms (DCCAs). The off-label use of the pipeline embolization device (PED) for these aneurysms has been explored recently but remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches (coiling and stent-assisted coiling) and PED for DCCAs in a multicenter cohort of patients. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort comparison study was conducted that included consecutive patients with unruptured DCCAs treated with either traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches or PED placement at three centers between 2016 and 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was applied to adjust for baseline risk factors between the PED and TET groups. Matching was based on age, sex, aneurysm size, location, morphology, adjunctive coiling, treatment history, and preoperative mRS score. RESULTS: In total, 209 patients with DCCAs treated with PED or traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches were identified. Thirty-seven patients underwent PED treatment, and 172 patients underwent traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches. After propensity score matching, 37 aneurysm pairs were matched, and the baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced between the groups. The complete occlusion rate between PED and traditional endovascular therapeutic approach in both matched cohorts (91.7 vs. 92.3%, p > 0.78) was similar. The rate of periprocedural treatment-related complications in both the PED and traditional endovascular therapeutic groups was 13.5%. Univariate analysis identified average parent vessel diameter as the only predictor of complete occlusion (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: PED is a viable option for treating DCCAs by providing occlusion and complication rates similar to those of traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches. A rigid patient selection procedure and proper planning should be undertaken to reduce treatment-related complications.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9157485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91574852022-06-02 Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis Ma, Chao Zhu, Haoyu Liang, Shikai Liang, Fei Sun, Jidian Zhang, Yupeng Jiang, Chuhan Front Neurol Neurology BACKGROUND: Coiling and stent-assisted coiling remain the first-line treatments for distal cerebral circulation aneurysms (DCCAs). The off-label use of the pipeline embolization device (PED) for these aneurysms has been explored recently but remains controversial. OBJECTIVE: To compare traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches (coiling and stent-assisted coiling) and PED for DCCAs in a multicenter cohort of patients. METHODS: A multicenter, retrospective cohort comparison study was conducted that included consecutive patients with unruptured DCCAs treated with either traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches or PED placement at three centers between 2016 and 2020. Propensity score matching analysis was applied to adjust for baseline risk factors between the PED and TET groups. Matching was based on age, sex, aneurysm size, location, morphology, adjunctive coiling, treatment history, and preoperative mRS score. RESULTS: In total, 209 patients with DCCAs treated with PED or traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches were identified. Thirty-seven patients underwent PED treatment, and 172 patients underwent traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches. After propensity score matching, 37 aneurysm pairs were matched, and the baseline characteristics of the patients were balanced between the groups. The complete occlusion rate between PED and traditional endovascular therapeutic approach in both matched cohorts (91.7 vs. 92.3%, p > 0.78) was similar. The rate of periprocedural treatment-related complications in both the PED and traditional endovascular therapeutic groups was 13.5%. Univariate analysis identified average parent vessel diameter as the only predictor of complete occlusion (p = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: PED is a viable option for treating DCCAs by providing occlusion and complication rates similar to those of traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches. A rigid patient selection procedure and proper planning should be undertaken to reduce treatment-related complications. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9157485/ /pubmed/35665044 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.755122 Text en Copyright © 2022 Ma, Zhu, Liang, Liang, Sun, Zhang and Jiang. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Ma, Chao
Zhu, Haoyu
Liang, Shikai
Liang, Fei
Sun, Jidian
Zhang, Yupeng
Jiang, Chuhan
Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_short Comparison of Pipeline Embolization Device and Traditional Endovascular Therapeutic Approaches in Distal Cerebral Circulation Aneurysms Using Propensity Score Matching Analysis
title_sort comparison of pipeline embolization device and traditional endovascular therapeutic approaches in distal cerebral circulation aneurysms using propensity score matching analysis
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665044
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.755122
work_keys_str_mv AT machao comparisonofpipelineembolizationdeviceandtraditionalendovasculartherapeuticapproachesindistalcerebralcirculationaneurysmsusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT zhuhaoyu comparisonofpipelineembolizationdeviceandtraditionalendovasculartherapeuticapproachesindistalcerebralcirculationaneurysmsusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liangshikai comparisonofpipelineembolizationdeviceandtraditionalendovasculartherapeuticapproachesindistalcerebralcirculationaneurysmsusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT liangfei comparisonofpipelineembolizationdeviceandtraditionalendovasculartherapeuticapproachesindistalcerebralcirculationaneurysmsusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT sunjidian comparisonofpipelineembolizationdeviceandtraditionalendovasculartherapeuticapproachesindistalcerebralcirculationaneurysmsusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT zhangyupeng comparisonofpipelineembolizationdeviceandtraditionalendovasculartherapeuticapproachesindistalcerebralcirculationaneurysmsusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT jiangchuhan comparisonofpipelineembolizationdeviceandtraditionalendovasculartherapeuticapproachesindistalcerebralcirculationaneurysmsusingpropensityscorematchinganalysis