Cargando…

Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis

INTRODUCTION: Women are related to higher stroke risk and poorer outcome after stroke attack in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The sex differences in efficacy and safety after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have remained elusive. This retrospective study aimed to invest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Yuyi, Zhang, Yonghua, Qu, Lulu, Chen, Chunyu, Su, Xi, Chen, Yanhong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.814958
_version_ 1784718655370559488
author Chen, Yuyi
Zhang, Yonghua
Qu, Lulu
Chen, Chunyu
Su, Xi
Chen, Yanhong
author_facet Chen, Yuyi
Zhang, Yonghua
Qu, Lulu
Chen, Chunyu
Su, Xi
Chen, Yanhong
author_sort Chen, Yuyi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Women are related to higher stroke risk and poorer outcome after stroke attack in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The sex differences in efficacy and safety after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have remained elusive. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of LAAC between women and men. METHODS: From 2014 to 2018, 395 patients who underwent LAAC in our center were enrolled in this retrospective study. Baseline clinical characteristics, procedural parameters, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and compared between women and men. RESULTS: The study included 154 women and 241 men. Compared with men, women were older (68.1 ± 7.9 vs. 64.6 ± 8.8, p < 0.01**), with higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.0 ± 1.6, p < 0.01**). During the mean follow-up duration of 1,566 days (4.3 years), there were 39 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including 19 cardiovascular or unexplained deaths, 15 ischemic strokes, and 5 major bleedings) recorded in 34 patients. The overall rate of ischemic stroke was 0.9 per 100 patient-years, and the overall rate of MACE was 2.1 per 100 patient-years. The cardiovascular or unexplained death and major bleeding were comparable between women and men. Compared with men, women had lower rates of ischemic stroke, fatal or disabling ischemic stroke, MACE, and fatal or disabling MACE, but none of them reached statistical differences (HR: 0.361, p = 0.099, HR: 0.429, p = 0.276, HR: 0.600, p = 0.170, and HR: 0.621, p = 0.254, respectively). In the adjusted analyses with multivariate Cox regression models, women had a lower fatal or disabling ischemic stroke rate compared with men (HR: 0.100, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Left atrial appendage closure was feasible and safe for patients of both genders. The ischemic stroke, cardiovascular or unexplained death, and major bleeding were comparable between women and men. However, women were the independent protective factors against fatal or disabling ischemic stroke after LAAC implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9157540
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91575402022-06-02 Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis Chen, Yuyi Zhang, Yonghua Qu, Lulu Chen, Chunyu Su, Xi Chen, Yanhong Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine INTRODUCTION: Women are related to higher stroke risk and poorer outcome after stroke attack in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). The sex differences in efficacy and safety after left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have remained elusive. This retrospective study aimed to investigate the safety, feasibility, and clinical outcomes of LAAC between women and men. METHODS: From 2014 to 2018, 395 patients who underwent LAAC in our center were enrolled in this retrospective study. Baseline clinical characteristics, procedural parameters, and postoperative follow-up data were collected and compared between women and men. RESULTS: The study included 154 women and 241 men. Compared with men, women were older (68.1 ± 7.9 vs. 64.6 ± 8.8, p < 0.01**), with higher CHA2DS2-VASc score (4.0 ± 1.7 vs. 3.0 ± 1.6, p < 0.01**). During the mean follow-up duration of 1,566 days (4.3 years), there were 39 major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE, including 19 cardiovascular or unexplained deaths, 15 ischemic strokes, and 5 major bleedings) recorded in 34 patients. The overall rate of ischemic stroke was 0.9 per 100 patient-years, and the overall rate of MACE was 2.1 per 100 patient-years. The cardiovascular or unexplained death and major bleeding were comparable between women and men. Compared with men, women had lower rates of ischemic stroke, fatal or disabling ischemic stroke, MACE, and fatal or disabling MACE, but none of them reached statistical differences (HR: 0.361, p = 0.099, HR: 0.429, p = 0.276, HR: 0.600, p = 0.170, and HR: 0.621, p = 0.254, respectively). In the adjusted analyses with multivariate Cox regression models, women had a lower fatal or disabling ischemic stroke rate compared with men (HR: 0.100, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Left atrial appendage closure was feasible and safe for patients of both genders. The ischemic stroke, cardiovascular or unexplained death, and major bleeding were comparable between women and men. However, women were the independent protective factors against fatal or disabling ischemic stroke after LAAC implantation. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9157540/ /pubmed/35665257 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.814958 Text en Copyright © 2022 Chen, Zhang, Qu, Chen, Su and Chen. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cardiovascular Medicine
Chen, Yuyi
Zhang, Yonghua
Qu, Lulu
Chen, Chunyu
Su, Xi
Chen, Yanhong
Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis
title Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis
title_full Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis
title_fullStr Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis
title_short Sex Differences in Efficacy and Safety After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: A 4.3-Year Follow-Up Analysis
title_sort sex differences in efficacy and safety after left atrial appendage closure: a 4.3-year follow-up analysis
topic Cardiovascular Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157540/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665257
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.814958
work_keys_str_mv AT chenyuyi sexdifferencesinefficacyandsafetyafterleftatrialappendageclosurea43yearfollowupanalysis
AT zhangyonghua sexdifferencesinefficacyandsafetyafterleftatrialappendageclosurea43yearfollowupanalysis
AT qululu sexdifferencesinefficacyandsafetyafterleftatrialappendageclosurea43yearfollowupanalysis
AT chenchunyu sexdifferencesinefficacyandsafetyafterleftatrialappendageclosurea43yearfollowupanalysis
AT suxi sexdifferencesinefficacyandsafetyafterleftatrialappendageclosurea43yearfollowupanalysis
AT chenyanhong sexdifferencesinefficacyandsafetyafterleftatrialappendageclosurea43yearfollowupanalysis