Cargando…
Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence
BACKGROUND: Several strategies have been implemented to reduce or abolish the life-threatening risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related multidrug-resistant infections due to duodenoscopes contaminations; among those strategies, serial microbiologic tests, thorough reproc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721249 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.122 |
_version_ | 1784718675307134976 |
---|---|
author | Lisotti, Andrea Fusaroli, Pietro Napoleon, Bertrand Cominardi, Anna Zagari, Rocco Maurizio |
author_facet | Lisotti, Andrea Fusaroli, Pietro Napoleon, Bertrand Cominardi, Anna Zagari, Rocco Maurizio |
author_sort | Lisotti, Andrea |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several strategies have been implemented to reduce or abolish the life-threatening risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related multidrug-resistant infections due to duodenoscopes contaminations; among those strategies, serial microbiologic tests, thorough reprocessing schedules, and use of removable scope cap have been adopted, but the potential cross-infection risk was not eliminated. AIM: To review available evidence in the field of single-use duodenoscopes (SUD) use for ERCP. METHODS: An overview on ongoing clinical studies was also performed to delineate which data will become available in the next future. RESULTS: One bench comparative study and four clinical trials performed with EXALT model-D (Boston Scientific Corp., United States) have been identified. Of them, one is a randomized controlled trial, while the other three studies are prospective single-arm, cross-over studies. Pooled technical success rate (4 studies, 368 patients) was 92.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-95.5; I(2): 11.8%]. Pooled serious adverse event (4 studies, 381 patients) rate was 5.9% [3.7%-8.5%; I(2): 0.0%]. CONCLUSION: Although few clinical trials are available, evidence is concordant in identifying an absolute feasibility and safety and feasibility for SUD use for ERCP. The expertise and quality of evidence in this field are going to be improved by further large clinical trials; data on cost-effectiveness and environmental impact will be needed for a worldwide spread of SUD use for ERCP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9157629 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Baishideng Publishing Group Inc |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91576292022-06-17 Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence Lisotti, Andrea Fusaroli, Pietro Napoleon, Bertrand Cominardi, Anna Zagari, Rocco Maurizio World J Methodol Systematic Reviews BACKGROUND: Several strategies have been implemented to reduce or abolish the life-threatening risk of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)-related multidrug-resistant infections due to duodenoscopes contaminations; among those strategies, serial microbiologic tests, thorough reprocessing schedules, and use of removable scope cap have been adopted, but the potential cross-infection risk was not eliminated. AIM: To review available evidence in the field of single-use duodenoscopes (SUD) use for ERCP. METHODS: An overview on ongoing clinical studies was also performed to delineate which data will become available in the next future. RESULTS: One bench comparative study and four clinical trials performed with EXALT model-D (Boston Scientific Corp., United States) have been identified. Of them, one is a randomized controlled trial, while the other three studies are prospective single-arm, cross-over studies. Pooled technical success rate (4 studies, 368 patients) was 92.9% [95% confidence interval (CI): 89.9-95.5; I(2): 11.8%]. Pooled serious adverse event (4 studies, 381 patients) rate was 5.9% [3.7%-8.5%; I(2): 0.0%]. CONCLUSION: Although few clinical trials are available, evidence is concordant in identifying an absolute feasibility and safety and feasibility for SUD use for ERCP. The expertise and quality of evidence in this field are going to be improved by further large clinical trials; data on cost-effectiveness and environmental impact will be needed for a worldwide spread of SUD use for ERCP. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-05-20 /pmc/articles/PMC9157629/ /pubmed/35721249 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.122 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. |
spellingShingle | Systematic Reviews Lisotti, Andrea Fusaroli, Pietro Napoleon, Bertrand Cominardi, Anna Zagari, Rocco Maurizio Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence |
title | Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence |
title_full | Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence |
title_fullStr | Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence |
title_full_unstemmed | Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence |
title_short | Single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence |
title_sort | single-use duodenoscopes for the prevention of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography -related cross-infection – from bench studies to clinical evidence |
topic | Systematic Reviews |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157629/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35721249 http://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v12.i3.122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lisottiandrea singleuseduodenoscopesforthepreventionofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyrelatedcrossinfectionfrombenchstudiestoclinicalevidence AT fusarolipietro singleuseduodenoscopesforthepreventionofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyrelatedcrossinfectionfrombenchstudiestoclinicalevidence AT napoleonbertrand singleuseduodenoscopesforthepreventionofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyrelatedcrossinfectionfrombenchstudiestoclinicalevidence AT cominardianna singleuseduodenoscopesforthepreventionofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyrelatedcrossinfectionfrombenchstudiestoclinicalevidence AT zagariroccomaurizio singleuseduodenoscopesforthepreventionofendoscopicretrogradecholangiopancreatographyrelatedcrossinfectionfrombenchstudiestoclinicalevidence |