Cargando…

Utility of FibroScan-based scoring systems to narrow the risk group of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with comorbidities

BACKGROUND: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is proposed as a second step of examination to assess liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after triaging by the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. Recently, VCTE-based scoring systems, including FibroScan-AST...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miura, Kouichi, Maeda, Hiroshi, Morimoto, Naoki, Watanabe, Shunji, Tsukui, Mamiko, Takaoka, Yoshinari, Nomoto, Hiroaki, Goka, Rie, Kotani, Kazuhiko, Yamamoto, Hironori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35720167
http://dx.doi.org/10.4291/wjgp.v13.i3.96
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is proposed as a second step of examination to assess liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) after triaging by the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index. Recently, VCTE-based scoring systems, including FibroScan-AST (FAST), Agile 3+, and Agile 4, emerged to determine the status of NAFLD. However, the significance of these scoring systems remains unknown in narrowing the high-risk group of NAFLD patients with comorbidities, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and esophagogastric varices (EGV). AIM: To clarify the significance of VCTE-based scoring systems to narrow the high-risk group of NAFLD patients with comorbidities. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study to investigate the usefulness of VCTE-based scoring systems and other fibrosis markers to narrow the high-risk group of patients with NAFLD. FIB-4 index was used for the first triage. Risk groups of FAST, Agile 3+, and Agile 4 were stratified according to the published data. Among the 191 patients with NAFLD, there were 26 (14%) and 25 patients (13%) with HCC and EGV, respectively. RESULTS: When 1.3 was used as a cutoff value, the FIB-4 index narrowed the risk group to 120 patients, in which all patients with HCC and/or EGV were included. High risk group of Agile 3+ could subsequently narrow the risk group. The prevalence of HCC and EGV at this step were 33% (26/80) and 31% (25/80), respectively. In further narrowing of EGV, Agile 4 aggregated the patients with EGV into 43 patients, of whom 23 (53%) had EGV. FAST failed to narrow the risk group of patients with comorbidities. When 2.6 was used as a cutoff value of the FIB-4 index, three patients with HCC and two patients with EGV were missed at the first triage. CONCLUSION: Agile 3+ and Agile 4 are useful to narrow the NAFLD patient group, in which patients may have HCC and/or EGV.