Cargando…

Endobiliary biopsy

The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant biliary strictures is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach with the use of serum biomarkers, imaging techniques, and several modalities of endoscopic or percutaneous tissue sampling. The diagnosis of biliary strictures consists...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Inchingolo, Riccardo, Acquafredda, Fabrizio, Posa, Alessandro, Nunes, Thiago Franchi, Spiliopoulos, Stavros, Panzera, Francesco, Praticò, Carlos Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719901
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.291
_version_ 1784718690015510528
author Inchingolo, Riccardo
Acquafredda, Fabrizio
Posa, Alessandro
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
Spiliopoulos, Stavros
Panzera, Francesco
Praticò, Carlos Alberto
author_facet Inchingolo, Riccardo
Acquafredda, Fabrizio
Posa, Alessandro
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
Spiliopoulos, Stavros
Panzera, Francesco
Praticò, Carlos Alberto
author_sort Inchingolo, Riccardo
collection PubMed
description The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant biliary strictures is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach with the use of serum biomarkers, imaging techniques, and several modalities of endoscopic or percutaneous tissue sampling. The diagnosis of biliary strictures consists of laboratory markers, and invasive and non-invasive imaging examinations such as computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Nevertheless, invasive imaging modalities combined with tissue sampling are usually required to confirm the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures, while pathological diagnosis is mandatory to decide the optimal therapeutic strategy. Although EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy is currently the standard procedure for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions, its diagnostic value in intraductal infiltrating type of cholangiocarcinoma remains limited. Moreover, the “endobiliary approach” using novel slim biopsy forceps, transpapillary and percutaneous cholangioscopy, and intraductal ultrasound-guided biopsy, is gaining ground on traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography endobiliary forceps biopsy. This review focuses on the available endobiliary techniques currently used to perform biliary strictures biopsy, comparing the diagnostic performance of endoscopic and percutaneous approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9157693
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91576932022-06-17 Endobiliary biopsy Inchingolo, Riccardo Acquafredda, Fabrizio Posa, Alessandro Nunes, Thiago Franchi Spiliopoulos, Stavros Panzera, Francesco Praticò, Carlos Alberto World J Gastrointest Endosc Minireviews The differential diagnosis between benign and malignant biliary strictures is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach with the use of serum biomarkers, imaging techniques, and several modalities of endoscopic or percutaneous tissue sampling. The diagnosis of biliary strictures consists of laboratory markers, and invasive and non-invasive imaging examinations such as computed tomography (CT), contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). Nevertheless, invasive imaging modalities combined with tissue sampling are usually required to confirm the diagnosis of suspected malignant biliary strictures, while pathological diagnosis is mandatory to decide the optimal therapeutic strategy. Although EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy is currently the standard procedure for tissue sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions, its diagnostic value in intraductal infiltrating type of cholangiocarcinoma remains limited. Moreover, the “endobiliary approach” using novel slim biopsy forceps, transpapillary and percutaneous cholangioscopy, and intraductal ultrasound-guided biopsy, is gaining ground on traditional endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography endobiliary forceps biopsy. This review focuses on the available endobiliary techniques currently used to perform biliary strictures biopsy, comparing the diagnostic performance of endoscopic and percutaneous approaches. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-05-16 2022-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9157693/ /pubmed/35719901 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.291 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Minireviews
Inchingolo, Riccardo
Acquafredda, Fabrizio
Posa, Alessandro
Nunes, Thiago Franchi
Spiliopoulos, Stavros
Panzera, Francesco
Praticò, Carlos Alberto
Endobiliary biopsy
title Endobiliary biopsy
title_full Endobiliary biopsy
title_fullStr Endobiliary biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Endobiliary biopsy
title_short Endobiliary biopsy
title_sort endobiliary biopsy
topic Minireviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9157693/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35719901
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v14.i5.291
work_keys_str_mv AT inchingoloriccardo endobiliarybiopsy
AT acquafreddafabrizio endobiliarybiopsy
AT posaalessandro endobiliarybiopsy
AT nunesthiagofranchi endobiliarybiopsy
AT spiliopoulosstavros endobiliarybiopsy
AT panzerafrancesco endobiliarybiopsy
AT praticocarlosalberto endobiliarybiopsy