Cargando…
Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by a method of meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for the studies about catheter ablation combined with le...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01885-9 |
_version_ | 1784718784298221568 |
---|---|
author | Qu, Jun Wang, Zhen Wang, Shuhao |
author_facet | Qu, Jun Wang, Zhen Wang, Shuhao |
author_sort | Qu, Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by a method of meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for the studies about catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF. The data analysis was performed using R 4.0.5 software. The retrieval time was from inception to May 12, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 18 published studies were identified in the meta-analysis, including 1385 participants. During the perioperative period of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF, the pooled incidences of pericardial effusion, major or minor bleeding events, and residual flow documented were 0.5%(95%CI 0.0002–0.0099), 1.42%(95% CI 0.00–0.04), 7.24%(95% CI 0.0447–0.0975), respectively. During the follow-up, the incidences of all-cause mortality, embolism events, and bleeding events were 0.32%(95%CI 0.0000–0.0071), 1.29%(95%CI 0.0037–0.0222), 2.07%(95% CI 0.0075–0.0339), respectively. In the follow-up period of the transesophageal echocardiography, the most complication was residual flow event with an incident rate of 10.80%(95% CI 0.054–0.1620). The maximum occurrence probability of residual flow events was 17.92% (95% CI 0.1133–0.2452). Moreover, the incident rate of NVAF recurrence was 29.23% (95% CI 0.2222–0.3623). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis suggests that the “one-stop” procedure is effective for those patients undergoing NVAF. However, Patients with more residual blood flow have a higher incidence of bleeding complications. More studies are warranted to verify the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in terms of the “one-stop” procedure. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9158183 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91581832022-06-02 Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis Qu, Jun Wang, Zhen Wang, Shuhao J Cardiothorac Surg Review OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by a method of meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for the studies about catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF. The data analysis was performed using R 4.0.5 software. The retrieval time was from inception to May 12, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 18 published studies were identified in the meta-analysis, including 1385 participants. During the perioperative period of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF, the pooled incidences of pericardial effusion, major or minor bleeding events, and residual flow documented were 0.5%(95%CI 0.0002–0.0099), 1.42%(95% CI 0.00–0.04), 7.24%(95% CI 0.0447–0.0975), respectively. During the follow-up, the incidences of all-cause mortality, embolism events, and bleeding events were 0.32%(95%CI 0.0000–0.0071), 1.29%(95%CI 0.0037–0.0222), 2.07%(95% CI 0.0075–0.0339), respectively. In the follow-up period of the transesophageal echocardiography, the most complication was residual flow event with an incident rate of 10.80%(95% CI 0.054–0.1620). The maximum occurrence probability of residual flow events was 17.92% (95% CI 0.1133–0.2452). Moreover, the incident rate of NVAF recurrence was 29.23% (95% CI 0.2222–0.3623). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis suggests that the “one-stop” procedure is effective for those patients undergoing NVAF. However, Patients with more residual blood flow have a higher incidence of bleeding complications. More studies are warranted to verify the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in terms of the “one-stop” procedure. BioMed Central 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9158183/ /pubmed/35642039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01885-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Review Qu, Jun Wang, Zhen Wang, Shuhao Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis |
title | Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis |
title_full | Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis |
title_short | Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis |
title_sort | effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158183/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01885-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qujun effectofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftappendageocclusionfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationametaanalysis AT wangzhen effectofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftappendageocclusionfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationametaanalysis AT wangshuhao effectofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftappendageocclusionfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationametaanalysis |