Cargando…

Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by a method of meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for the studies about catheter ablation combined with le...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Qu, Jun, Wang, Zhen, Wang, Shuhao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01885-9
_version_ 1784718784298221568
author Qu, Jun
Wang, Zhen
Wang, Shuhao
author_facet Qu, Jun
Wang, Zhen
Wang, Shuhao
author_sort Qu, Jun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by a method of meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for the studies about catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF. The data analysis was performed using R 4.0.5 software. The retrieval time was from inception to May 12, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 18 published studies were identified in the meta-analysis, including 1385 participants. During the perioperative period of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF, the pooled incidences of pericardial effusion, major or minor bleeding events, and residual flow documented were 0.5%(95%CI 0.0002–0.0099), 1.42%(95% CI 0.00–0.04), 7.24%(95% CI 0.0447–0.0975), respectively. During the follow-up, the incidences of all-cause mortality, embolism events, and bleeding events were 0.32%(95%CI 0.0000–0.0071), 1.29%(95%CI 0.0037–0.0222), 2.07%(95% CI 0.0075–0.0339), respectively. In the follow-up period of the transesophageal echocardiography, the most complication was residual flow event with an incident rate of 10.80%(95% CI 0.054–0.1620). The maximum occurrence probability of residual flow events was 17.92% (95% CI 0.1133–0.2452). Moreover, the incident rate of NVAF recurrence was 29.23% (95% CI 0.2222–0.3623). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis suggests that the “one-stop” procedure is effective for those patients undergoing NVAF. However, Patients with more residual blood flow have a higher incidence of bleeding complications. More studies are warranted to verify the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in terms of the “one-stop” procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9158183
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91581832022-06-02 Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis Qu, Jun Wang, Zhen Wang, Shuhao J Cardiothorac Surg Review OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) by a method of meta-analysis. METHODS: Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for the studies about catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF. The data analysis was performed using R 4.0.5 software. The retrieval time was from inception to May 12, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 18 published studies were identified in the meta-analysis, including 1385 participants. During the perioperative period of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in treating NVAF, the pooled incidences of pericardial effusion, major or minor bleeding events, and residual flow documented were 0.5%(95%CI 0.0002–0.0099), 1.42%(95% CI 0.00–0.04), 7.24%(95% CI 0.0447–0.0975), respectively. During the follow-up, the incidences of all-cause mortality, embolism events, and bleeding events were 0.32%(95%CI 0.0000–0.0071), 1.29%(95%CI 0.0037–0.0222), 2.07%(95% CI 0.0075–0.0339), respectively. In the follow-up period of the transesophageal echocardiography, the most complication was residual flow event with an incident rate of 10.80%(95% CI 0.054–0.1620). The maximum occurrence probability of residual flow events was 17.92% (95% CI 0.1133–0.2452). Moreover, the incident rate of NVAF recurrence was 29.23% (95% CI 0.2222–0.3623). CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis suggests that the “one-stop” procedure is effective for those patients undergoing NVAF. However, Patients with more residual blood flow have a higher incidence of bleeding complications. More studies are warranted to verify the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion in terms of the “one-stop” procedure. BioMed Central 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9158183/ /pubmed/35642039 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01885-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
Qu, Jun
Wang, Zhen
Wang, Shuhao
Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
title Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
title_full Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
title_short Effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
title_sort effect of catheter ablation combined with left appendage occlusion for non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158183/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642039
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01885-9
work_keys_str_mv AT qujun effectofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftappendageocclusionfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationametaanalysis
AT wangzhen effectofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftappendageocclusionfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationametaanalysis
AT wangshuhao effectofcatheterablationcombinedwithleftappendageocclusionfornonvalvularatrialfibrillationametaanalysis