Cargando…

Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of American College of Radiology (ACR) score and ACR Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) for benign nodules, medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) through comparing with Kwak TI-RADS. METHODS: Five hundred ni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Ziwei, Lin, Ning
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01053-z
_version_ 1784718809583583232
author Zhang, Ziwei
Lin, Ning
author_facet Zhang, Ziwei
Lin, Ning
author_sort Zhang, Ziwei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of American College of Radiology (ACR) score and ACR Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) for benign nodules, medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) through comparing with Kwak TI-RADS. METHODS: Five hundred nine patients diagnosed with PTC, MTC or benign thyroid nodules were included and classified into the benign thyroid nodules group (n = 264), the PTC group (n = 189) and the MTC group (n = 56). The area under the curve (AUC) values were analyzed and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to compare the diagnostic efficiencies of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and KWAK TI-RADS on benign thyroid nodules, MTC and PTC. RESULTS: The AUC values of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS for distinguishing malignant nodules from benign nodules were 0.914 (95%CI: 0.886–0.937), 0.871 (95%CI: 0.839–0.899) and 0.885 (95%CI: 0.854–0.911), respectively. In distinguishing of patients with MTC from PTC, the AUC values of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS were 0.650 (95%CI: 0.565–0.734), 0.596 (95%CI: 0.527–0.664), and 0.613 (95%CI: 0.545–0.681), respectively. The AUC values of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS for the discrimination of patients with MTC, PTC or benign nodules from patients without MTC, PTC or benign nodules were 0.899 (95%CI: 0.882–0.915), 0.865 (95%CI: 0.846–0.885), and 0.873 (95%CI: 0.854–0.893), respectively. CONCLUSION: The ACR score performed the best, followed ex aequo by the ACR and Kwak TI-RADS in discriminating patients with malignant nodules from benign nodules and patients with MTC from PTC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-01053-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9158315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91583152022-06-02 Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules Zhang, Ziwei Lin, Ning BMC Endocr Disord Research BACKGROUND: To evaluate the diagnostic value of American College of Radiology (ACR) score and ACR Thyroid Imaging Report and Data System (TI-RADS) for benign nodules, medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) through comparing with Kwak TI-RADS. METHODS: Five hundred nine patients diagnosed with PTC, MTC or benign thyroid nodules were included and classified into the benign thyroid nodules group (n = 264), the PTC group (n = 189) and the MTC group (n = 56). The area under the curve (AUC) values were analyzed and the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were drawn to compare the diagnostic efficiencies of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and KWAK TI-RADS on benign thyroid nodules, MTC and PTC. RESULTS: The AUC values of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS for distinguishing malignant nodules from benign nodules were 0.914 (95%CI: 0.886–0.937), 0.871 (95%CI: 0.839–0.899) and 0.885 (95%CI: 0.854–0.911), respectively. In distinguishing of patients with MTC from PTC, the AUC values of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS were 0.650 (95%CI: 0.565–0.734), 0.596 (95%CI: 0.527–0.664), and 0.613 (95%CI: 0.545–0.681), respectively. The AUC values of ACR score, ACR TI-RADS and Kwak TI-RADS for the discrimination of patients with MTC, PTC or benign nodules from patients without MTC, PTC or benign nodules were 0.899 (95%CI: 0.882–0.915), 0.865 (95%CI: 0.846–0.885), and 0.873 (95%CI: 0.854–0.893), respectively. CONCLUSION: The ACR score performed the best, followed ex aequo by the ACR and Kwak TI-RADS in discriminating patients with malignant nodules from benign nodules and patients with MTC from PTC. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12902-022-01053-z. BioMed Central 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9158315/ /pubmed/35642030 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01053-z Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zhang, Ziwei
Lin, Ning
Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules
title Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules
title_full Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules
title_fullStr Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules
title_full_unstemmed Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules
title_short Clinical diagnostic value of American College of Radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules
title_sort clinical diagnostic value of american college of radiology thyroid imaging report and data system in different kinds of thyroid nodules
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35642030
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12902-022-01053-z
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangziwei clinicaldiagnosticvalueofamericancollegeofradiologythyroidimagingreportanddatasystemindifferentkindsofthyroidnodules
AT linning clinicaldiagnosticvalueofamericancollegeofradiologythyroidimagingreportanddatasystemindifferentkindsofthyroidnodules