Cargando…

Programmed multi-level ventilation in COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome: a multi-center retrospective observational study

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with multiple programmed levels of positive end expiratory pressure (programmed multi-level ventilation; PMLV) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Depta, Filip, Török, Pavol, G. Miller, Andrew, Firment, Peter, Leškanič, Jozef, Porubän, Adam, Halaš, Pavol, Mandinec, Stanislav, Filka, Vladimír, Zajac, Henryk, Gentile, Michael A., Zdravkovic, Marko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9158417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35634917
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605221101970
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: We evaluated pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) with multiple programmed levels of positive end expiratory pressure (programmed multi-level ventilation; PMLV) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study from November 2020 to February 2021. PMLV was used with PCV in all patients with intensive care admission until improvement in oxygenation (fraction of inspired oxygen [FiO(2)] ≤0.50 and oxygen saturation [SpO(2)] >92%). The observed outcomes were improvement of hypoxemia, length of mechanical ventilation, partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO(2)) stability, and adverse events. RESULTS: Of 188 mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19-related ARDS, we analyzed 60 patients treated with PMLV. Hypoxemia improved in 55 (92%) patients, as measured by the change in partial pressure of oxygen/FiO(2) and SpO(2)/FiO(2) ratios on day 3 versus day 1, and in 32 (66%) ventilated patients on day 7 versus day 3. The median (interquartile range) length of mechanical ventilation for survivors and non-survivors was 8.4 (4.7–14.9) and 6.7 (3.6–10.3) days, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PMLV appears to be a safe and effective ventilation strategy for improving hypoxemia in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. Further studies are needed comparing the PMLV mode with the conventional ARDS ventilatory approach.