Cargando…

Outcome of intravitreal Avastin® injections in patients with macular oedema in Uganda: a cohort study

BACKGROUND: To determine the outcome of Intravitreal Avastin (IVA) injections in patients with Macular Oedema (MO) in Uganda. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients presenting with MO at the Department of Ophthalmology of Mbarara University of Science and Technology in Southern Uganda from Nov...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kabunga, Rachel R., Onyango, John, Ruvuma, Sam, Arunga, Simon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159050/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35590055
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41433-022-02006-5
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: To determine the outcome of Intravitreal Avastin (IVA) injections in patients with Macular Oedema (MO) in Uganda. METHODS: We prospectively recruited patients presenting with MO at the Department of Ophthalmology of Mbarara University of Science and Technology in Southern Uganda from November 2018 to April 2019. We treated them with intravitreal injection of Bevacizumab (Avastin®) and followed them up for three consecutive months after the initial injection. We collected information on baseline clinical presentation and 3 month outcomes. We performed a Student’s t-test to compare central macular thickness (CMT) and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at baseline and at 3 months after IVA injections. We performed linear regression to test for predictors of change in CMT and BCVA at 3 months. RESULTS: We enroled 32 patients (35 eyes) of which 29 patients (32 eyes) completed the follow up. The mean age was 62.8 ± 11.8 years, and 53% were male. At 3 months after IVA, the mean CMT improved significantly from 426.90 ± 135.9 µm at baseline to 311.20 ± 134.80 µm (p = 0.0008). The mean BCVA improved from 0.70 ± 0.38 at baseline to 0.38 ± 0.36 logMAR units (p = 0.003). The improvement in CMT and BCVA were more marked in patients who had Diabetic ME compared to other causes. A high baseline CMT was a strong predictor of improvement in CMT at 3 months after IVA therapy. A worse baseline visual acuity was a predictor of improvement in vision at 3 months after IVA. CONCLUSIONS: IVA therapy results in anatomical and visual improvement at 3 months especially in patients with Diabetic MO. Having a high baseline CMT was a predictor of good CMT outcome at 3 months while a worse vision at baseline was a predictor of better visual outcome at 3 months.