Cargando…

Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of Infective endocarditis (IE) is poor, and we conducted this investigation to evaluate the worth of admission lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio (LWR) for prediction of short-term outcome in IE patients. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the medical records of 147 IE...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Mengying, Ge, Qiuxia, Qiao, Tengfei, Wang, Yaman, Xia, Xiaohong, Zhang, Xiang, Zhou, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35685545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8667054
_version_ 1784718999139909632
author Zhang, Mengying
Ge, Qiuxia
Qiao, Tengfei
Wang, Yaman
Xia, Xiaohong
Zhang, Xiang
Zhou, Jun
author_facet Zhang, Mengying
Ge, Qiuxia
Qiao, Tengfei
Wang, Yaman
Xia, Xiaohong
Zhang, Xiang
Zhou, Jun
author_sort Zhang, Mengying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The prognosis of Infective endocarditis (IE) is poor, and we conducted this investigation to evaluate the worth of admission lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio (LWR) for prediction of short-term outcome in IE patients. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the medical records of 147 IE patients from January 2017 to December 2019. Patients were divided into the survivor group and nonsurvivor group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to estimate the independent factors contribution to in-hospital death, and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to check the performance. RESULTS: The levels of LWR (0.17 ± 0.08 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06) were significantly increased among the survivor group compared with the nonsurvivor group (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis displayed that LWR (hazard ratio (HR): 1.755, 1.304–2.362, P < 0.001) was not interfered by other confounding factors for early death. Moreover, ROC analysis suggested that LWR (cutoff value = 0.10) performed the best among assessed indexes for the forecast of primary outcome (area under curve (AUC) = 0.750, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.634–0.867, P < 0.001, sensitivity = 70.0%, specificity = 76.4%), and the proportion of in-hospital mortality was remarkably inferior in patients with LWR > 0.10 than in those with LWR ≤ 0.10. (5.83% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LMR is an independent, simple, universal, inexpensive, and reliable prognostic parameter to identify high-risk IE patients for in-hospital mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9159181
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91591812022-06-07 Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients Zhang, Mengying Ge, Qiuxia Qiao, Tengfei Wang, Yaman Xia, Xiaohong Zhang, Xiang Zhou, Jun Int J Clin Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The prognosis of Infective endocarditis (IE) is poor, and we conducted this investigation to evaluate the worth of admission lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio (LWR) for prediction of short-term outcome in IE patients. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed the medical records of 147 IE patients from January 2017 to December 2019. Patients were divided into the survivor group and nonsurvivor group. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to estimate the independent factors contribution to in-hospital death, and receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curve was utilized to check the performance. RESULTS: The levels of LWR (0.17 ± 0.08 vs. 0.10 ± 0.06) were significantly increased among the survivor group compared with the nonsurvivor group (P = 0.001). Multivariate analysis displayed that LWR (hazard ratio (HR): 1.755, 1.304–2.362, P < 0.001) was not interfered by other confounding factors for early death. Moreover, ROC analysis suggested that LWR (cutoff value = 0.10) performed the best among assessed indexes for the forecast of primary outcome (area under curve (AUC) = 0.750, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.634–0.867, P < 0.001, sensitivity = 70.0%, specificity = 76.4%), and the proportion of in-hospital mortality was remarkably inferior in patients with LWR > 0.10 than in those with LWR ≤ 0.10. (5.83% vs. 31.8%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: LMR is an independent, simple, universal, inexpensive, and reliable prognostic parameter to identify high-risk IE patients for in-hospital mortality. Hindawi 2022-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC9159181/ /pubmed/35685545 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8667054 Text en Copyright © 2022 Mengying Zhang et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Mengying
Ge, Qiuxia
Qiao, Tengfei
Wang, Yaman
Xia, Xiaohong
Zhang, Xiang
Zhou, Jun
Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients
title Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients
title_full Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients
title_short Prognostic Value of Lymphocyte-to-White Blood Cell Ratio for In-Hospital Mortality in Infective Endocarditis Patients
title_sort prognostic value of lymphocyte-to-white blood cell ratio for in-hospital mortality in infective endocarditis patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159181/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35685545
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/8667054
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangmengying prognosticvalueoflymphocytetowhitebloodcellratioforinhospitalmortalityininfectiveendocarditispatients
AT geqiuxia prognosticvalueoflymphocytetowhitebloodcellratioforinhospitalmortalityininfectiveendocarditispatients
AT qiaotengfei prognosticvalueoflymphocytetowhitebloodcellratioforinhospitalmortalityininfectiveendocarditispatients
AT wangyaman prognosticvalueoflymphocytetowhitebloodcellratioforinhospitalmortalityininfectiveendocarditispatients
AT xiaxiaohong prognosticvalueoflymphocytetowhitebloodcellratioforinhospitalmortalityininfectiveendocarditispatients
AT zhangxiang prognosticvalueoflymphocytetowhitebloodcellratioforinhospitalmortalityininfectiveendocarditispatients
AT zhoujun prognosticvalueoflymphocytetowhitebloodcellratioforinhospitalmortalityininfectiveendocarditispatients