Cargando…

Comparison of Ocular Morphological Parameters Related to Lens Position by Anterior Segment Optical Coherence Tomography and Ultrasound Biomicroscopy

OBJECTIVE: The objective is to compare parameters related to lens position measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in patients with senile cataract and perform a consistency analysis. METHODS: This prospective study included 102 patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yu, Zhiying, Wang, Fenglei, Dong, Fang, Li, Na, Wang, Dabo, Wang, Ling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35685518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/7599631
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: The objective is to compare parameters related to lens position measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) and ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM) in patients with senile cataract and perform a consistency analysis. METHODS: This prospective study included 102 patients (102 eyes) scheduled for simple cataract surgery. Among the total patients, 44 were men, and 58 were women. AS-OCT (sitting) and UBM (lying) were used to measure the anterior chamber depth (ACD) in horizontal and vertical orientations and the iris-lens contact distance (ILCD) and iris-lens angle (ILA) in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants. Paired-sample t-test was used to compare ACD, ILCD, and ILA measurements of the two methods, while Pearson's linear correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to analyze the correlation and consistency of the two results. RESULTS: The horizontal (2.499 ± 0.464 mm) and vertical (2.531 ± 0.463 mm) ACD measured using AS-OCT and the horizontal (2.556 ± 0.467 mm) and vertical (2.563 ± 0.479 mm) ACD measured using UBM were significantly different (P < 0.001); moreover, the results showed good correlation and agreement. A significant difference was observed between the two methods in terms of ILCD measured in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants (P < 0.001), and a significant correlation was found between measurements of both methods (P < 0.001). Approximately 3.92% (4/102), 0.98% (1/102), 3.92% (4/102), and 2.94% (3/102) of points were outside the 95% limits of agreement in the four quadrants, respectively, and the agreement of the results was good. ILA measured using both methods differed in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants (P=0.003, 0.011, 0.001, 0.001, respectively), and the correlation was good (P < 0.001). The percentage of points outside the 95% limit was higher in inferior, superior, nasal, and temporal quadrants (4.90% (5/102), 5.88% (6/102), 5.88% (6/102), and 6.86% (7/102)) with poor agreement of the results. CONCLUSIONS: The correlation between AS-OCT and UBM in terms of measuring lens position-related parameters was good, but the agreement was unstable. The differences in measurement position (sitting and supine) and/or measurement methods (optics and ultrasound) may lead to variability in results.