Cargando…
Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management
Background In this era of upcoming newer formulations of topical ointments in the market, selecting an appropriate topical ointment for managing ulcers is challenging with regards to granulation tissue promotion, ulcer size reduction, and decrease in the amount of discharge from the ulcer. This stud...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cureus
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663699 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24667 |
_version_ | 1784719025254694912 |
---|---|
author | Gupta, Shubham Shinde, Raju K Shinde, Sangita |
author_facet | Gupta, Shubham Shinde, Raju K Shinde, Sangita |
author_sort | Gupta, Shubham |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background In this era of upcoming newer formulations of topical ointments in the market, selecting an appropriate topical ointment for managing ulcers is challenging with regards to granulation tissue promotion, ulcer size reduction, and decrease in the amount of discharge from the ulcer. This study compares the outcomes of two topical iodine formulations, namely, cadexomer iodine ointment (0.9%) and povidone-iodine ointment (5%), for the management of various types of ulcers. Methodology This prospective, interventional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. After screening, 40 patients with ulcers (venous, arterial, diabetic, traumatic, infective) were subjected to simple randomization based on computer-generated random numbers at a ratio of 1:1 for the application of cadexomer (n = 20) (Group A) and povidone-iodine ointment (n = 20) (Group B). Selected patients were subjected to broad-spectrum antibiotics on admission and then shifted to special antibiotics based on the culture and sensitivity report of the wound. The application of these two formulations was done in three settings, each lasting 48 hours. The efficacy of these two formulations was assessed based on the following three parameters: (a) the percentage of granulation tissue promotion, (b) wound size reduction, and (c) decline in wound discharge. The study groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, while the association among the study groups was performed using Fishers’ test, Student’s t-test, and chi-square test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results Significant improvement (p < 0.05) in granulation tissue was observed with cadexomer ointment application compared to povidone-iodine ointment. Statistically significant reductions in ulcer size and discharge from ulcers were seen in both groups; however, clinically, cadexomer ointment was found to be more effective compared to povidone-iodine ointment in reducing ulcer size as well as in reducing the amount of discharge from ulcers. Conclusions Cadexomer iodine ointment proved to be better than povidone-iodine ointment in the management of ulcers regarding the percentage of granulation tissue promotion, ulcer size reduction, and decrease in the amount of discharge from ulcers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9159290 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Cureus |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91592902022-06-04 Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management Gupta, Shubham Shinde, Raju K Shinde, Sangita Cureus Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Background In this era of upcoming newer formulations of topical ointments in the market, selecting an appropriate topical ointment for managing ulcers is challenging with regards to granulation tissue promotion, ulcer size reduction, and decrease in the amount of discharge from the ulcer. This study compares the outcomes of two topical iodine formulations, namely, cadexomer iodine ointment (0.9%) and povidone-iodine ointment (5%), for the management of various types of ulcers. Methodology This prospective, interventional study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. After screening, 40 patients with ulcers (venous, arterial, diabetic, traumatic, infective) were subjected to simple randomization based on computer-generated random numbers at a ratio of 1:1 for the application of cadexomer (n = 20) (Group A) and povidone-iodine ointment (n = 20) (Group B). Selected patients were subjected to broad-spectrum antibiotics on admission and then shifted to special antibiotics based on the culture and sensitivity report of the wound. The application of these two formulations was done in three settings, each lasting 48 hours. The efficacy of these two formulations was assessed based on the following three parameters: (a) the percentage of granulation tissue promotion, (b) wound size reduction, and (c) decline in wound discharge. The study groups were compared using an unpaired t-test, while the association among the study groups was performed using Fishers’ test, Student’s t-test, and chi-square test. P-values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Results Significant improvement (p < 0.05) in granulation tissue was observed with cadexomer ointment application compared to povidone-iodine ointment. Statistically significant reductions in ulcer size and discharge from ulcers were seen in both groups; however, clinically, cadexomer ointment was found to be more effective compared to povidone-iodine ointment in reducing ulcer size as well as in reducing the amount of discharge from ulcers. Conclusions Cadexomer iodine ointment proved to be better than povidone-iodine ointment in the management of ulcers regarding the percentage of granulation tissue promotion, ulcer size reduction, and decrease in the amount of discharge from ulcers. Cureus 2022-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9159290/ /pubmed/35663699 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24667 Text en Copyright © 2022, Gupta et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation Gupta, Shubham Shinde, Raju K Shinde, Sangita Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management |
title | Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management |
title_full | Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management |
title_short | Comparison of the Outcomes of Cadexomer Iodine and Povidone-Iodine Ointments in Wound Management |
title_sort | comparison of the outcomes of cadexomer iodine and povidone-iodine ointments in wound management |
topic | Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159290/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663699 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.24667 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guptashubham comparisonoftheoutcomesofcadexomeriodineandpovidoneiodineointmentsinwoundmanagement AT shinderajuk comparisonoftheoutcomesofcadexomeriodineandpovidoneiodineointmentsinwoundmanagement AT shindesangita comparisonoftheoutcomesofcadexomeriodineandpovidoneiodineointmentsinwoundmanagement |