Cargando…
SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study
BACKGROUND: SIOP Ependymoma I was a non-randomised trial assessing event free and overall survival (EFS/OS) of non-metastatic intracranial ependymoma in children aged 3–21 years treated with a staged management strategy. A further aim was to assess the response rate (RR) of subtotally resected (STR)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35018471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac012 |
_version_ | 1784719054962950144 |
---|---|
author | Ritzmann, Timothy A Chapman, Rebecca J Kilday, John-Paul Thorp, Nicola Modena, Piergiorgio Dineen, Robert A Macarthur, Donald Mallucci, Conor Jaspan, Timothy Pajtler, Kristian W Giagnacovo, Marzia Jacques, Thomas S Paine, Simon M L Ellison, David W Bouffet, Eric Grundy, Richard G |
author_facet | Ritzmann, Timothy A Chapman, Rebecca J Kilday, John-Paul Thorp, Nicola Modena, Piergiorgio Dineen, Robert A Macarthur, Donald Mallucci, Conor Jaspan, Timothy Pajtler, Kristian W Giagnacovo, Marzia Jacques, Thomas S Paine, Simon M L Ellison, David W Bouffet, Eric Grundy, Richard G |
author_sort | Ritzmann, Timothy A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: SIOP Ependymoma I was a non-randomised trial assessing event free and overall survival (EFS/OS) of non-metastatic intracranial ependymoma in children aged 3–21 years treated with a staged management strategy. A further aim was to assess the response rate (RR) of subtotally resected (STR) ependymoma to vincristine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (VEC). We report final results with 12-year follow-up and post hoc analyses of recently described biomarkers. METHODS: Seventy-four participants were eligible. Children with gross total resection (GTR) received radiotherapy, whilst those with STR received VEC before radiotherapy. DNA methylation, 1q, hTERT, ReLA, Tenascin-C, H3K27me3, and pAKT status were evaluated. RESULTS: Five- and ten-year EFS was 49.5% and 46.7%, OS was 69.3% and 60.5%. GTR was achieved in 33/74 (44.6%) and associated with improved EFS (P = .003, HR = 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–5.1). Grade 3 tumours were associated with worse OS (P = .005, HR = 2.8, 95%CI 1.3–5.8). 1q gain and hTERT expression were associated with poorer EFS (P = .003, HR = 2.70, 95%CI 1.49–6.10 and P = .014, HR = 5.8, 95%CI 1.2–28) and H3K27me3 loss with worse OS (P = .003, HR = 4.6, 95%CI 1.5–13.2). Methylation profiles showed expected patterns. 12 participants with STR did not receive chemotherapy; a protocol violation. However, best chemotherapy RR was 65.5% (19/29, 95%CI 45.7–82.1), exceeding the prespecified 45%. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with totally resected ependymoma had the best outcomes. RR of STR to VEC exceeded the pre-specified efficacy criterion. However, cases of inaccurate stratification highlighted the need for rapid central review. 1q gain, H3K27me3 loss, and hTERT expression were all associated with poorer survival outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9159435 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91594352022-06-05 SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study Ritzmann, Timothy A Chapman, Rebecca J Kilday, John-Paul Thorp, Nicola Modena, Piergiorgio Dineen, Robert A Macarthur, Donald Mallucci, Conor Jaspan, Timothy Pajtler, Kristian W Giagnacovo, Marzia Jacques, Thomas S Paine, Simon M L Ellison, David W Bouffet, Eric Grundy, Richard G Neuro Oncol Clinical Investigations BACKGROUND: SIOP Ependymoma I was a non-randomised trial assessing event free and overall survival (EFS/OS) of non-metastatic intracranial ependymoma in children aged 3–21 years treated with a staged management strategy. A further aim was to assess the response rate (RR) of subtotally resected (STR) ependymoma to vincristine, etoposide, and cyclophosphamide (VEC). We report final results with 12-year follow-up and post hoc analyses of recently described biomarkers. METHODS: Seventy-four participants were eligible. Children with gross total resection (GTR) received radiotherapy, whilst those with STR received VEC before radiotherapy. DNA methylation, 1q, hTERT, ReLA, Tenascin-C, H3K27me3, and pAKT status were evaluated. RESULTS: Five- and ten-year EFS was 49.5% and 46.7%, OS was 69.3% and 60.5%. GTR was achieved in 33/74 (44.6%) and associated with improved EFS (P = .003, HR = 2.6, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4–5.1). Grade 3 tumours were associated with worse OS (P = .005, HR = 2.8, 95%CI 1.3–5.8). 1q gain and hTERT expression were associated with poorer EFS (P = .003, HR = 2.70, 95%CI 1.49–6.10 and P = .014, HR = 5.8, 95%CI 1.2–28) and H3K27me3 loss with worse OS (P = .003, HR = 4.6, 95%CI 1.5–13.2). Methylation profiles showed expected patterns. 12 participants with STR did not receive chemotherapy; a protocol violation. However, best chemotherapy RR was 65.5% (19/29, 95%CI 45.7–82.1), exceeding the prespecified 45%. CONCLUSIONS: Participants with totally resected ependymoma had the best outcomes. RR of STR to VEC exceeded the pre-specified efficacy criterion. However, cases of inaccurate stratification highlighted the need for rapid central review. 1q gain, H3K27me3 loss, and hTERT expression were all associated with poorer survival outcomes. Oxford University Press 2022-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9159435/ /pubmed/35018471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac012 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Clinical Investigations Ritzmann, Timothy A Chapman, Rebecca J Kilday, John-Paul Thorp, Nicola Modena, Piergiorgio Dineen, Robert A Macarthur, Donald Mallucci, Conor Jaspan, Timothy Pajtler, Kristian W Giagnacovo, Marzia Jacques, Thomas S Paine, Simon M L Ellison, David W Bouffet, Eric Grundy, Richard G SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study |
title | SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study |
title_full | SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study |
title_fullStr | SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study |
title_full_unstemmed | SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study |
title_short | SIOP Ependymoma I: Final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—A BIOMECA Consortium Study |
title_sort | siop ependymoma i: final results, long-term follow-up, and molecular analysis of the trial cohort—a biomeca consortium study |
topic | Clinical Investigations |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159435/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35018471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ritzmanntimothya siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT chapmanrebeccaj siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT kildayjohnpaul siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT thorpnicola siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT modenapiergiorgio siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT dineenroberta siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT macarthurdonald siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT mallucciconor siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT jaspantimothy siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT pajtlerkristianw siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT giagnacovomarzia siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT jacquesthomass siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT painesimonml siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT ellisondavidw siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT bouffeteric siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy AT grundyrichardg siopependymomaifinalresultslongtermfollowupandmolecularanalysisofthetrialcohortabiomecaconsortiumstudy |