Cargando…

Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Currently, the treatment of radiation pneumonitis (RP) remains a clinical challenge. Although glucocorticoids are used for RP treatment, they have associated side effects. Xuebijing injection (XBJ) has been widely used for RP treatment in China, but so far no meta-analysis has evaluated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Zheng, Wang, Dandan, Zhang, Ying, Wang, Shuo, Wang, Xueqian, Li, Yuxiao, Gui, Yuerong, Dong, Jun, Hou, Wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268819
_version_ 1784719093283160064
author Li, Zheng
Wang, Dandan
Zhang, Ying
Wang, Shuo
Wang, Xueqian
Li, Yuxiao
Gui, Yuerong
Dong, Jun
Hou, Wei
author_facet Li, Zheng
Wang, Dandan
Zhang, Ying
Wang, Shuo
Wang, Xueqian
Li, Yuxiao
Gui, Yuerong
Dong, Jun
Hou, Wei
author_sort Li, Zheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, the treatment of radiation pneumonitis (RP) remains a clinical challenge. Although glucocorticoids are used for RP treatment, they have associated side effects. Xuebijing injection (XBJ) has been widely used for RP treatment in China, but so far no meta-analysis has evaluated its efficacy and safety. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, SinoMED, and China Science and Technology J Database were searched for randomized controlled trials related to XBJ in RP treatment. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The outcomes were synthesized and analyzed using the Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan 5.3) software, and a forest plot generated. RESULT: Eight articles met the eligibility criteria for further data extraction and meta-analysis. A total of 578 patients with RP participated in these studies, including 296 in the experimental group (XBJ+BT), and 282 in the control group (BT). The results of the meta-analysis revealed that compared to the BT group, XBJ+BT significantly increased the total effective rate (n = 578; RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.61, p<0.0001), and IL-10 expression (n = 296; MD = 17.62, 95% CI:13.95 to 21.29, p<0.00001), decreased interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression (n = 296; MD = -21.56, 95% CI:-27.37 to -15.76, p<0.00001), that of tumor necrosis factor alpha (n = 246; MD = -25.63, 95% CI:-30.77 to -20.50, p<0.00001), and that of C-reactive protein (n = 296; MD = -48.61, 95% CI:-56.49–40.73, p< 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we do not recommend XBJ as an adjuvant treatment for RP. Further randomized controlled trials with rigorous design, strict implementation, and standard reporting are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of XBJ for RP treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY registration number: INPLASY2020120037.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9159617
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91596172022-06-02 Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis Li, Zheng Wang, Dandan Zhang, Ying Wang, Shuo Wang, Xueqian Li, Yuxiao Gui, Yuerong Dong, Jun Hou, Wei PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Currently, the treatment of radiation pneumonitis (RP) remains a clinical challenge. Although glucocorticoids are used for RP treatment, they have associated side effects. Xuebijing injection (XBJ) has been widely used for RP treatment in China, but so far no meta-analysis has evaluated its efficacy and safety. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG database, SinoMED, and China Science and Technology J Database were searched for randomized controlled trials related to XBJ in RP treatment. Two researchers independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. The outcomes were synthesized and analyzed using the Cochrane Review Manager (RevMan 5.3) software, and a forest plot generated. RESULT: Eight articles met the eligibility criteria for further data extraction and meta-analysis. A total of 578 patients with RP participated in these studies, including 296 in the experimental group (XBJ+BT), and 282 in the control group (BT). The results of the meta-analysis revealed that compared to the BT group, XBJ+BT significantly increased the total effective rate (n = 578; RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.30 to 1.61, p<0.0001), and IL-10 expression (n = 296; MD = 17.62, 95% CI:13.95 to 21.29, p<0.00001), decreased interleukin-6 (IL-6) expression (n = 296; MD = -21.56, 95% CI:-27.37 to -15.76, p<0.00001), that of tumor necrosis factor alpha (n = 246; MD = -25.63, 95% CI:-30.77 to -20.50, p<0.00001), and that of C-reactive protein (n = 296; MD = -48.61, 95% CI:-56.49–40.73, p< 0.00001). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, we do not recommend XBJ as an adjuvant treatment for RP. Further randomized controlled trials with rigorous design, strict implementation, and standard reporting are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of XBJ for RP treatment. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY registration number: INPLASY2020120037. Public Library of Science 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9159617/ /pubmed/35648739 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268819 Text en © 2022 Li et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Zheng
Wang, Dandan
Zhang, Ying
Wang, Shuo
Wang, Xueqian
Li, Yuxiao
Gui, Yuerong
Dong, Jun
Hou, Wei
Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis
title Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis
title_full Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis
title_fullStr Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis
title_short Efficacy and safety of Xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: A meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of xuebijing injection for radiation pneumonitis: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159617/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648739
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0268819
work_keys_str_mv AT lizheng efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT wangdandan efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT zhangying efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT wangshuo efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT wangxueqian efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT liyuxiao efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT guiyuerong efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT dongjun efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis
AT houwei efficacyandsafetyofxuebijinginjectionforradiationpneumonitisametaanalysis