Cargando…
Response to Comment on “Improper molecular ferroelectrics with simultaneous ultrahigh pyroelectricity and figures of merit”
Szafrański and Katrusiak stated that [Hdabco]ClO(4) and [Hdabco]BF(4) are proper ferroelectrics and exhibit much smaller pyroelectric coefficients than our results. We disagree with the arguments and provide a detailed answer highlighting misunderstandings in their interpretation.
Autores principales: | Li, Wenru, Tang, Gang, Zhang, Guangzu, Hong, Jiawang, Huang, Houbing, Wang, Qing |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Association for the Advancement of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9159690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35648861 http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abl9935 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Improper molecular ferroelectrics with simultaneous ultrahigh pyroelectricity and figures of merit
por: Li, Wenru, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comment on “Improper molecular ferroelectrics with simultaneous ultrahigh pyroelectricity and figures of merit” by Li et al.
por: Szafrański, Marek, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Improving the thermoelectric figure of merit
por: Goldsmid, H. Julian
Publicado: (2021) -
Recipes for improper ferroelectricity in molecular perovskites
por: Boström, Hanna L. B., et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
The ultrathin limit of improper ferroelectricity
por: Nordlander, J., et al.
Publicado: (2019)