Cargando…
Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma
Multiplex immunofluorescence staining enables the simultaneous detection of multiple immune markers in a single tissue section, and is a useful tool for the identification of specific cell populations within the tumour microenvironment. However, this technology has rarely been validated against stan...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.810858 |
_version_ | 1784719240942583808 |
---|---|
author | Yaseen, Zarwa Gide, Tuba N. Conway, Jordan W. Potter, Alison J. Quek, Camelia Hong, Angela M. Long, Georgina V. Scolyer, Richard A. Wilmott, James S. |
author_facet | Yaseen, Zarwa Gide, Tuba N. Conway, Jordan W. Potter, Alison J. Quek, Camelia Hong, Angela M. Long, Georgina V. Scolyer, Richard A. Wilmott, James S. |
author_sort | Yaseen, Zarwa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Multiplex immunofluorescence staining enables the simultaneous detection of multiple immune markers in a single tissue section, and is a useful tool for the identification of specific cell populations within the tumour microenvironment. However, this technology has rarely been validated against standard clinical immunohistology, which is a barrier for its integration into clinical practice. This study sought to validate and investigate the accuracy, precision and reproducibility of a multiplex immunofluorescence compared with immunohistochemistry (IHC), including tissue staining, imaging and analysis, in characterising the expression of immune and melanoma markers in both the tumour and its microenvironment. Traditional chromogenic IHC, single-plex immunofluorescence and multiplex immunofluorescence were each performed on serial tissue sections of a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue microarray containing metastatic melanoma specimens from 67 patients. The panel included the immune cell markers CD8, CD68, CD16, the immune checkpoint PD-L1, and melanoma tumour marker SOX10. Slides were stained with the Opal(™) 7 colour Kit (Akoya Biosciences) on the intelliPATH autostainer (Biocare Medical) and imaged using the Vectra 3.0.5 microscope. Marker expression was quantified using Halo v.3.2.181 (Indica Labs). Comparison of the IHC and single-plex immunofluorescence revealed highly significant positive correlations between the cell densities of CD8, CD68, CD16, PD-L1 and SOX10 marker positive cells (Spearman’s rho = 0.927 to 0.750, p < 0.0001). Highly significant correlations were also observed for all markers between single-plex immunofluorescence and multiplex immunofluorescence staining (Spearman’s rho >0.9, p < 0.0001). Finally, correlation analysis of the three multiplex replicates revealed a high degree of reproducibility between slides (Spearman’s rho >0.940, p < 0.0001). Together, these data highlight the reliability and validity of multiplex immunofluorescence in accurately profiling the tumour and its associated microenvironment using FFPE metastatic melanoma specimens. This validated multiplex panel can be utilised for research evaluating melanoma and its microenvironment, such as studies performed to predict patient response or resistance to immunotherapies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9160303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91603032022-06-03 Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma Yaseen, Zarwa Gide, Tuba N. Conway, Jordan W. Potter, Alison J. Quek, Camelia Hong, Angela M. Long, Georgina V. Scolyer, Richard A. Wilmott, James S. Front Mol Biosci Molecular Biosciences Multiplex immunofluorescence staining enables the simultaneous detection of multiple immune markers in a single tissue section, and is a useful tool for the identification of specific cell populations within the tumour microenvironment. However, this technology has rarely been validated against standard clinical immunohistology, which is a barrier for its integration into clinical practice. This study sought to validate and investigate the accuracy, precision and reproducibility of a multiplex immunofluorescence compared with immunohistochemistry (IHC), including tissue staining, imaging and analysis, in characterising the expression of immune and melanoma markers in both the tumour and its microenvironment. Traditional chromogenic IHC, single-plex immunofluorescence and multiplex immunofluorescence were each performed on serial tissue sections of a formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue microarray containing metastatic melanoma specimens from 67 patients. The panel included the immune cell markers CD8, CD68, CD16, the immune checkpoint PD-L1, and melanoma tumour marker SOX10. Slides were stained with the Opal(™) 7 colour Kit (Akoya Biosciences) on the intelliPATH autostainer (Biocare Medical) and imaged using the Vectra 3.0.5 microscope. Marker expression was quantified using Halo v.3.2.181 (Indica Labs). Comparison of the IHC and single-plex immunofluorescence revealed highly significant positive correlations between the cell densities of CD8, CD68, CD16, PD-L1 and SOX10 marker positive cells (Spearman’s rho = 0.927 to 0.750, p < 0.0001). Highly significant correlations were also observed for all markers between single-plex immunofluorescence and multiplex immunofluorescence staining (Spearman’s rho >0.9, p < 0.0001). Finally, correlation analysis of the three multiplex replicates revealed a high degree of reproducibility between slides (Spearman’s rho >0.940, p < 0.0001). Together, these data highlight the reliability and validity of multiplex immunofluorescence in accurately profiling the tumour and its associated microenvironment using FFPE metastatic melanoma specimens. This validated multiplex panel can be utilised for research evaluating melanoma and its microenvironment, such as studies performed to predict patient response or resistance to immunotherapies. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9160303/ /pubmed/35664673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.810858 Text en Copyright © 2022 Yaseen, Gide, Conway, Potter, Quek, Hong, Long, Scolyer and Wilmott. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Biosciences Yaseen, Zarwa Gide, Tuba N. Conway, Jordan W. Potter, Alison J. Quek, Camelia Hong, Angela M. Long, Georgina V. Scolyer, Richard A. Wilmott, James S. Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma |
title | Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma |
title_full | Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma |
title_fullStr | Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma |
title_short | Validation of an Accurate Automated Multiplex Immunofluorescence Method for Immuno-Profiling Melanoma |
title_sort | validation of an accurate automated multiplex immunofluorescence method for immuno-profiling melanoma |
topic | Molecular Biosciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664673 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2022.810858 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yaseenzarwa validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT gidetuban validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT conwayjordanw validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT potteralisonj validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT quekcamelia validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT hongangelam validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT longgeorginav validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT scolyerricharda validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma AT wilmottjamess validationofanaccurateautomatedmultipleximmunofluorescencemethodforimmunoprofilingmelanoma |