Cargando…
A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence
Due to differences in potency, efficacy, and affinity for CB1 receptors, similarities and differences in psychoactive effect profiles of natural cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cannot reliably be derived from equipotent dose comparisons. Instead, the current study proposes to compare the i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891811 |
_version_ | 1784719268120625152 |
---|---|
author | Theunissen, Eef Lien Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette Mason, Natasha Leigh Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus |
author_facet | Theunissen, Eef Lien Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette Mason, Natasha Leigh Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus |
author_sort | Theunissen, Eef Lien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to differences in potency, efficacy, and affinity for CB1 receptors, similarities and differences in psychoactive effect profiles of natural cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cannot reliably be derived from equipotent dose comparisons. Instead, the current study proposes to compare the intrinsic psychoactive effects of natural cannabis (THC) and an SC, JWH-018, at psychotropic dose equivalence. Participants from two placebo-controlled studies were matched for their levels of subjective high to compare neurocognitive and psychotomimetic effects of THC and JWH-018. At equal subjective intoxication levels, both drugs impaired psychomotor, divided attention, and impulse control, with no significant difference between the two drugs. Both drugs also caused significant psychotomimetic effects, but dissociative effects were considerably more pronounced for JWH-018 than THC. We conclude that psychotropic dose equivalence provides a uniform approach for comparing the neurocognitive and psychotomimetic profiles of CB1 agonists, which can also be applied to other drug classes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9160432 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91604322022-06-03 A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence Theunissen, Eef Lien Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette Mason, Natasha Leigh Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Due to differences in potency, efficacy, and affinity for CB1 receptors, similarities and differences in psychoactive effect profiles of natural cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cannot reliably be derived from equipotent dose comparisons. Instead, the current study proposes to compare the intrinsic psychoactive effects of natural cannabis (THC) and an SC, JWH-018, at psychotropic dose equivalence. Participants from two placebo-controlled studies were matched for their levels of subjective high to compare neurocognitive and psychotomimetic effects of THC and JWH-018. At equal subjective intoxication levels, both drugs impaired psychomotor, divided attention, and impulse control, with no significant difference between the two drugs. Both drugs also caused significant psychotomimetic effects, but dissociative effects were considerably more pronounced for JWH-018 than THC. We conclude that psychotropic dose equivalence provides a uniform approach for comparing the neurocognitive and psychotomimetic profiles of CB1 agonists, which can also be applied to other drug classes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9160432/ /pubmed/35664482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891811 Text en Copyright © 2022 Theunissen, Kuypers, Mason and Ramaekers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychiatry Theunissen, Eef Lien Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette Mason, Natasha Leigh Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence |
title | A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence |
title_full | A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence |
title_fullStr | A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence |
title_short | A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence |
title_sort | comparison of acute neurocognitive and psychotomimetic effects of a synthetic cannabinoid and natural cannabis at psychotropic dose equivalence |
topic | Psychiatry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160432/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891811 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT theunisseneeflien acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence AT kuyperskimpaulacolette acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence AT masonnatashaleigh acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence AT ramaekersjohannesgerardus acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence AT theunisseneeflien comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence AT kuyperskimpaulacolette comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence AT masonnatashaleigh comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence AT ramaekersjohannesgerardus comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence |