Cargando…

A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence

Due to differences in potency, efficacy, and affinity for CB1 receptors, similarities and differences in psychoactive effect profiles of natural cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cannot reliably be derived from equipotent dose comparisons. Instead, the current study proposes to compare the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Theunissen, Eef Lien, Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette, Mason, Natasha Leigh, Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891811
_version_ 1784719268120625152
author Theunissen, Eef Lien
Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette
Mason, Natasha Leigh
Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus
author_facet Theunissen, Eef Lien
Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette
Mason, Natasha Leigh
Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus
author_sort Theunissen, Eef Lien
collection PubMed
description Due to differences in potency, efficacy, and affinity for CB1 receptors, similarities and differences in psychoactive effect profiles of natural cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cannot reliably be derived from equipotent dose comparisons. Instead, the current study proposes to compare the intrinsic psychoactive effects of natural cannabis (THC) and an SC, JWH-018, at psychotropic dose equivalence. Participants from two placebo-controlled studies were matched for their levels of subjective high to compare neurocognitive and psychotomimetic effects of THC and JWH-018. At equal subjective intoxication levels, both drugs impaired psychomotor, divided attention, and impulse control, with no significant difference between the two drugs. Both drugs also caused significant psychotomimetic effects, but dissociative effects were considerably more pronounced for JWH-018 than THC. We conclude that psychotropic dose equivalence provides a uniform approach for comparing the neurocognitive and psychotomimetic profiles of CB1 agonists, which can also be applied to other drug classes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9160432
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91604322022-06-03 A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence Theunissen, Eef Lien Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette Mason, Natasha Leigh Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Due to differences in potency, efficacy, and affinity for CB1 receptors, similarities and differences in psychoactive effect profiles of natural cannabis and synthetic cannabinoids (SCs) cannot reliably be derived from equipotent dose comparisons. Instead, the current study proposes to compare the intrinsic psychoactive effects of natural cannabis (THC) and an SC, JWH-018, at psychotropic dose equivalence. Participants from two placebo-controlled studies were matched for their levels of subjective high to compare neurocognitive and psychotomimetic effects of THC and JWH-018. At equal subjective intoxication levels, both drugs impaired psychomotor, divided attention, and impulse control, with no significant difference between the two drugs. Both drugs also caused significant psychotomimetic effects, but dissociative effects were considerably more pronounced for JWH-018 than THC. We conclude that psychotropic dose equivalence provides a uniform approach for comparing the neurocognitive and psychotomimetic profiles of CB1 agonists, which can also be applied to other drug classes. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9160432/ /pubmed/35664482 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891811 Text en Copyright © 2022 Theunissen, Kuypers, Mason and Ramaekers. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Theunissen, Eef Lien
Kuypers, Kim Paula Colette
Mason, Natasha Leigh
Ramaekers, Johannes Gerardus
A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence
title A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence
title_full A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence
title_fullStr A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence
title_short A Comparison of Acute Neurocognitive and Psychotomimetic Effects of a Synthetic Cannabinoid and Natural Cannabis at Psychotropic Dose Equivalence
title_sort comparison of acute neurocognitive and psychotomimetic effects of a synthetic cannabinoid and natural cannabis at psychotropic dose equivalence
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160432/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664482
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.891811
work_keys_str_mv AT theunisseneeflien acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence
AT kuyperskimpaulacolette acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence
AT masonnatashaleigh acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence
AT ramaekersjohannesgerardus acomparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence
AT theunisseneeflien comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence
AT kuyperskimpaulacolette comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence
AT masonnatashaleigh comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence
AT ramaekersjohannesgerardus comparisonofacuteneurocognitiveandpsychotomimeticeffectsofasyntheticcannabinoidandnaturalcannabisatpsychotropicdoseequivalence