Cargando…
Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hydroxychloroquine when used with personal protective equipment reduces the proportion of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among healthcare workers in comparison to the use of personal protective equipment alone. DESIGN: Multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomise...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35649613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059540 |
_version_ | 1784719295480070144 |
---|---|
author | Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Jha, Vivekanand Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn Myatra, Sheila Nainan Ghosh, Arpita Bhattacharya, Amritendu Arfin, Sumaiya Bassi, Abhinav Donaldson, Lachlan Hugh Hammond, Naomi E John, Oommen Joshi, Rohina Kunigari, Mallikarjuna Amrutha, Cynthia Husaini, Syed Haider Mehdi Ghosh, Subir Nag, Santosh Kumar Selvaraj, Hari Krishnan Kantroo, Viny Shah, Kamal D Venkatesh, Balasubramanian |
author_facet | Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Jha, Vivekanand Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn Myatra, Sheila Nainan Ghosh, Arpita Bhattacharya, Amritendu Arfin, Sumaiya Bassi, Abhinav Donaldson, Lachlan Hugh Hammond, Naomi E John, Oommen Joshi, Rohina Kunigari, Mallikarjuna Amrutha, Cynthia Husaini, Syed Haider Mehdi Ghosh, Subir Nag, Santosh Kumar Selvaraj, Hari Krishnan Kantroo, Viny Shah, Kamal D Venkatesh, Balasubramanian |
author_sort | Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hydroxychloroquine when used with personal protective equipment reduces the proportion of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among healthcare workers in comparison to the use of personal protective equipment alone. DESIGN: Multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised trial. Enrolment started on 29 June 2020 and stopped on 4 February 2021. Participants randomised in HydrOxychloroquine Prophylaxis Evaluation were followed for 6 months. SETTING: 9 hospitals across India. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers in an environment with exposure to COVID-19 were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to hydroxychloroquine plus use of personal protective equipment or personal protective equipment alone. 886 participants were screened and 416 randomised (213 hydroxychloroquine arm and 203 personal protective equipment). INTERVENTION: Participants in intervention arm received 800 mg of hydroxychloroquine on day of randomisation and then 400 mg once a week for 12 weeks in addition to the use of personal protective equipment. In the control arm, participants continued to use personal protective equipment alone. MAIN OUTCOME: Proportion of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in the 6 months after randomisation. RESULTS: Participants were young (mean age 32.1 years, SD 9.1 years) with low-comorbid burden. 47.4% were female. In the 6 months after randomisation (primary analysis population=413), 11 participants assigned to the hydroxychloroquine group and 12 participants assigned to the standard practice group met the primary endpoint (5.2% vs 5.9%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.07, p=0.72). There was no heterogeneity of treatment effect in any prespecified subgroup. There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. The adverse event rates were 9.9% and 6.9% in the hydroxychloroquine and standard practice arms, respectively. There were no serious adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hydroxychloroquine along with personal protective equipment was not superior to personal protective equipment alone on the proportion of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Definitive conclusions are precluded as the trial stopped early for futility, and hence was underpowered. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2020/05/025067. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9160584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91605842022-06-02 Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Jha, Vivekanand Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn Myatra, Sheila Nainan Ghosh, Arpita Bhattacharya, Amritendu Arfin, Sumaiya Bassi, Abhinav Donaldson, Lachlan Hugh Hammond, Naomi E John, Oommen Joshi, Rohina Kunigari, Mallikarjuna Amrutha, Cynthia Husaini, Syed Haider Mehdi Ghosh, Subir Nag, Santosh Kumar Selvaraj, Hari Krishnan Kantroo, Viny Shah, Kamal D Venkatesh, Balasubramanian BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To determine whether hydroxychloroquine when used with personal protective equipment reduces the proportion of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 among healthcare workers in comparison to the use of personal protective equipment alone. DESIGN: Multicentre, parallel-group, open-label randomised trial. Enrolment started on 29 June 2020 and stopped on 4 February 2021. Participants randomised in HydrOxychloroquine Prophylaxis Evaluation were followed for 6 months. SETTING: 9 hospitals across India. PARTICIPANTS: Healthcare workers in an environment with exposure to COVID-19 were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to hydroxychloroquine plus use of personal protective equipment or personal protective equipment alone. 886 participants were screened and 416 randomised (213 hydroxychloroquine arm and 203 personal protective equipment). INTERVENTION: Participants in intervention arm received 800 mg of hydroxychloroquine on day of randomisation and then 400 mg once a week for 12 weeks in addition to the use of personal protective equipment. In the control arm, participants continued to use personal protective equipment alone. MAIN OUTCOME: Proportion of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in the 6 months after randomisation. RESULTS: Participants were young (mean age 32.1 years, SD 9.1 years) with low-comorbid burden. 47.4% were female. In the 6 months after randomisation (primary analysis population=413), 11 participants assigned to the hydroxychloroquine group and 12 participants assigned to the standard practice group met the primary endpoint (5.2% vs 5.9%; OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.35 to 2.07, p=0.72). There was no heterogeneity of treatment effect in any prespecified subgroup. There were no significant differences in the secondary outcomes. The adverse event rates were 9.9% and 6.9% in the hydroxychloroquine and standard practice arms, respectively. There were no serious adverse events in either group. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Hydroxychloroquine along with personal protective equipment was not superior to personal protective equipment alone on the proportion of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19. Definitive conclusions are precluded as the trial stopped early for futility, and hence was underpowered. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2020/05/025067. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9160584/ /pubmed/35649613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059540 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Public Health Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan, Bharath Kumar Jha, Vivekanand Rajbhandari, Dorrilyn Myatra, Sheila Nainan Ghosh, Arpita Bhattacharya, Amritendu Arfin, Sumaiya Bassi, Abhinav Donaldson, Lachlan Hugh Hammond, Naomi E John, Oommen Joshi, Rohina Kunigari, Mallikarjuna Amrutha, Cynthia Husaini, Syed Haider Mehdi Ghosh, Subir Nag, Santosh Kumar Selvaraj, Hari Krishnan Kantroo, Viny Shah, Kamal D Venkatesh, Balasubramanian Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India |
title | Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India |
title_full | Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India |
title_fullStr | Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India |
title_full_unstemmed | Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India |
title_short | Hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from India |
title_sort | hydroxychloroquine plus personal protective equipment versus personal protective equipment alone for the prevention of laboratory-confirmed covid-19 infections among healthcare workers: a multicentre, parallel-group randomised controlled trial from india |
topic | Public Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35649613 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059540 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tirupakuzhivijayaraghavanbharathkumar hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT jhavivekanand hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT rajbhandaridorrilyn hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT myatrasheilanainan hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT ghosharpita hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT bhattacharyaamritendu hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT arfinsumaiya hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT bassiabhinav hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT donaldsonlachlanhugh hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT hammondnaomie hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT johnoommen hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT joshirohina hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT kunigarimallikarjuna hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT amruthacynthia hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT husainisyedhaidermehdi hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT ghoshsubir hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT nagsantoshkumar hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT selvarajharikrishnan hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT kantrooviny hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT shahkamald hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT venkateshbalasubramanian hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia AT hydroxychloroquinepluspersonalprotectiveequipmentversuspersonalprotectiveequipmentaloneforthepreventionoflaboratoryconfirmedcovid19infectionsamonghealthcareworkersamulticentreparallelgrouprandomisedcontrolledtrialfromindia |