Cargando…

Rapid antigen testing by community health workers for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Dhaka, Bangladesh: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and feasibility of rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low-income communities. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional community-based diagnostic accuracy study. Community health workers, who were trained and supervised by medical techni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sania, Ayesha, Alam, Ahmed Nawsher, Alamgir, A S M, Andrecka, Joanna, Brum, Eric, Chadwick, Fergus, Chowdhury, Tasnuva, Hasan, Zakiul, Hill, Davina L, Khan, Farzana, Kundegorski, Mikolaj, Lee, Seonjoo, Rahman, Mahbubur, Rayport, Yael K, Shirin, Tahmina, Tasneem, Motahara, Hampson, Katie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160589/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35649599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060832
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic performance and feasibility of rapid antigen testing for SARS-CoV-2 detection in low-income communities. DESIGN: We conducted a cross-sectional community-based diagnostic accuracy study. Community health workers, who were trained and supervised by medical technicians, performed rapid antigen tests on symptomatic individuals, and up to two additional household members in their households and diagnostic results were calibrated against the gold standard RT-PCR. SETTING: Low-income communities in Dhaka, Bangladesh. PARTICIPANTS: Between 19 May 2021 and 11 July 2021, 1240 nasal and saliva samples were collected from symptomatic individuals and 993 samples from additional household members (up to two from one household). RESULTS: The sensitivity of rapid antigen tests was 0.68 on nasal samples (95% CI 0.62 to 0.73) and 0.41 on saliva (95% CI 0.35 to 0.46), with specificity also higher on nasal samples (0.98, 95% CI 0.97 to 0.99) than saliva (0.87, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.90). Testing up to two additional household members increased sensitivity to 0.71 on nasal samples (95% CI 0.65 to 0.76), but reduced specificity (0.96, 95% CI 0.94 to 0.97). Sensitivity on saliva rose to 0.48 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.54) with two additional household members tested but remained lower than sensitivity on nasal samples. During the study period, testing in these low-income communities increased fourfold through the mobilisation of community health workers for sample collection. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid antigen testing on nasal swabs can be effectively performed by community health workers yielding equivalent sensitivity and specificity to the literature. Household testing by community health workers in low-resource settings is an inexpensive approach that can increase testing capacity, accessibility and the effectiveness of control measures through immediately actionable results.