Cargando…

Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones. However, another option is gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy which preserves the normal physiological functions of the gallbladder in patients desiring to avoid surgical resection. AIM: To compare the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ullah, Saif, Yang, Bao-Hong, Liu, Dan, Lu, Xue-Yang, Liu, Zhen-Zhen, Zhao, Li-Xia, Zhang, Ji-Yu, Liu, Bing-Rong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734621
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.470
_version_ 1784719321353682944
author Ullah, Saif
Yang, Bao-Hong
Liu, Dan
Lu, Xue-Yang
Liu, Zhen-Zhen
Zhao, Li-Xia
Zhang, Ji-Yu
Liu, Bing-Rong
author_facet Ullah, Saif
Yang, Bao-Hong
Liu, Dan
Lu, Xue-Yang
Liu, Zhen-Zhen
Zhao, Li-Xia
Zhang, Ji-Yu
Liu, Bing-Rong
author_sort Ullah, Saif
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones. However, another option is gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy which preserves the normal physiological functions of the gallbladder in patients desiring to avoid surgical resection. AIM: To compare the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic gallstones. METHODS: We adopted propensity score matching (1:1) to compare trans-rectal NOTES cholecystolithotomy and LC patients with symptomatic gallstones. We reviewed 2511 patients with symptomatic gallstones from December 2017 to December 2020; 517 patients met the matching criteria (NOTES, 110; LC, 407), yielding 86 pairs. RESULTS: The technical success rate for the NOTES group was 98.9% vs 100% for the LC group. The median procedure time was 119 min [interquartile ranges (IQRs), 95-175] with NOTES vs 60 min (IQRs, 48-90) with LC (P < 0.001). The frequency of post-operative pain was similar between NOTES and LC: 4.7% (4/85) vs 5.8% (5/95) (P = 0.740). The median duration of post-procedure fasting with NOTES was 1 d (IQRs, 1-2) vs 2 d with LC (IQRs, 1-3) (P < 0.001). The median post-operative hospital stay for NOTES was 4 d (IQRs, 3-6) vs 4 d for LC (IQRs, 3-5), (P = 0.092). During follow-up, diarrhea was significantly less with NOTES (5.8%) compared to LC (18.6%) (P = 0.011). Gallstones and cholecystitis recurrence within a median of 12 mo (range: 6-40 mo) following NOTES was 10.5% and 3.5%, respectively. Concerns regarding the presence of abdominal wall scars were present in 17.4% (n = 15/86) of patients following LC (mainly women). CONCLUSION: NOTES provides a feasible new alternative scar-free treatment for patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo cholecystectomy. This minimally invasive organ-sparing procedure both removes the gallstones and preserves the physiological function of the gallbladder. Reducing gallstone recurrence is essential to achieving widespread clinical adoption of NOTES.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9160690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91606902022-06-21 Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study Ullah, Saif Yang, Bao-Hong Liu, Dan Lu, Xue-Yang Liu, Zhen-Zhen Zhao, Li-Xia Zhang, Ji-Yu Liu, Bing-Rong World J Gastrointest Surg Retrospective Study BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomy is the preferred treatment option for symptomatic gallstones. However, another option is gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy which preserves the normal physiological functions of the gallbladder in patients desiring to avoid surgical resection. AIM: To compare the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of pure natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) gallbladder-preserving cholecystolithotomy vs laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for symptomatic gallstones. METHODS: We adopted propensity score matching (1:1) to compare trans-rectal NOTES cholecystolithotomy and LC patients with symptomatic gallstones. We reviewed 2511 patients with symptomatic gallstones from December 2017 to December 2020; 517 patients met the matching criteria (NOTES, 110; LC, 407), yielding 86 pairs. RESULTS: The technical success rate for the NOTES group was 98.9% vs 100% for the LC group. The median procedure time was 119 min [interquartile ranges (IQRs), 95-175] with NOTES vs 60 min (IQRs, 48-90) with LC (P < 0.001). The frequency of post-operative pain was similar between NOTES and LC: 4.7% (4/85) vs 5.8% (5/95) (P = 0.740). The median duration of post-procedure fasting with NOTES was 1 d (IQRs, 1-2) vs 2 d with LC (IQRs, 1-3) (P < 0.001). The median post-operative hospital stay for NOTES was 4 d (IQRs, 3-6) vs 4 d for LC (IQRs, 3-5), (P = 0.092). During follow-up, diarrhea was significantly less with NOTES (5.8%) compared to LC (18.6%) (P = 0.011). Gallstones and cholecystitis recurrence within a median of 12 mo (range: 6-40 mo) following NOTES was 10.5% and 3.5%, respectively. Concerns regarding the presence of abdominal wall scars were present in 17.4% (n = 15/86) of patients following LC (mainly women). CONCLUSION: NOTES provides a feasible new alternative scar-free treatment for patients who are unwilling or unable to undergo cholecystectomy. This minimally invasive organ-sparing procedure both removes the gallstones and preserves the physiological function of the gallbladder. Reducing gallstone recurrence is essential to achieving widespread clinical adoption of NOTES. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2022-05-27 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9160690/ /pubmed/35734621 http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.470 Text en ©The Author(s) 2022. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Retrospective Study
Ullah, Saif
Yang, Bao-Hong
Liu, Dan
Lu, Xue-Yang
Liu, Zhen-Zhen
Zhao, Li-Xia
Zhang, Ji-Yu
Liu, Bing-Rong
Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study
title Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study
title_full Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study
title_fullStr Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study
title_full_unstemmed Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study
title_short Are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? A propensity matched study
title_sort are laparoscopic cholecystectomy and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery gallbladder preserving cholecystolithotomy truly comparable? a propensity matched study
topic Retrospective Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35734621
http://dx.doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v14.i5.470
work_keys_str_mv AT ullahsaif arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy
AT yangbaohong arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy
AT liudan arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy
AT luxueyang arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy
AT liuzhenzhen arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy
AT zhaolixia arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy
AT zhangjiyu arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy
AT liubingrong arelaparoscopiccholecystectomyandnaturalorificetransluminalendoscopicsurgerygallbladderpreservingcholecystolithotomytrulycomparableapropensitymatchedstudy