Cargando…

Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis

PRECIS: Omission of PORT following BCS remains high among rural patients despite evidence that PORT leads to a significant reduction in the risk of local recurrence. Further research is needed to examine the impact of rural residence on treatment choices and develop methods to ensure equitable care...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riley, Danielle, Chrischilles, Elizabeth A., Lizarraga, Ingrid M., Charlton, Mary, Smith, Brian J., Lynch, Charles F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4605
_version_ 1784719346795282432
author Riley, Danielle
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
Lizarraga, Ingrid M.
Charlton, Mary
Smith, Brian J.
Lynch, Charles F.
author_facet Riley, Danielle
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
Lizarraga, Ingrid M.
Charlton, Mary
Smith, Brian J.
Lynch, Charles F.
author_sort Riley, Danielle
collection PubMed
description PRECIS: Omission of PORT following BCS remains high among rural patients despite evidence that PORT leads to a significant reduction in the risk of local recurrence. Further research is needed to examine the impact of rural residence on treatment choices and develop methods to ensure equitable care among all breast cancer patients. BACKGROUND: Despite national guidelines, debate exists among clinicians regarding the optimal approach to treatment for patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). While regional variation in practice patterns has been well documented, population‐based information on rural–urban treatment differences is lacking. METHODS: Data from the SEER Patterns of Care studies were used to identify women diagnosed with histologically confirmed DCIS who underwent cancer‐directed surgery in the years 1991, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using weighted multivariable logistic regression to evaluate cancer‐directed surgery and use of post‐operative radiation therapy (PORT). RESULTS: Of the 3337 patients who met inclusion criteria, 27% underwent mastectomy, 26% underwent breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) without PORT, and 47% underwent BCS with PORT. After adjustment for other covariates, there was no difference in the likelihood of receiving mastectomy between rural and urban patients (aOR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.37–1.14). However, rural residents were more likely than urban residents to have mastectomy during 1991/1995 (aOR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.09–2.91; p (interaction) = 0.022). Across all diagnosis years, patients residing in rural areas were less likely to receive PORT following BCS compared to urban patients (aOR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.18–0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Omission of PORT following BCS remains high among rural patients despite evidence that PORT leads to a significant reduction in the risk of local recurrence. Further research is needed to examine the impact of rural residence on treatment choices and develop methods to ensure equitable care among all breast cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9160801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91608012022-06-04 Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis Riley, Danielle Chrischilles, Elizabeth A. Lizarraga, Ingrid M. Charlton, Mary Smith, Brian J. Lynch, Charles F. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES PRECIS: Omission of PORT following BCS remains high among rural patients despite evidence that PORT leads to a significant reduction in the risk of local recurrence. Further research is needed to examine the impact of rural residence on treatment choices and develop methods to ensure equitable care among all breast cancer patients. BACKGROUND: Despite national guidelines, debate exists among clinicians regarding the optimal approach to treatment for patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). While regional variation in practice patterns has been well documented, population‐based information on rural–urban treatment differences is lacking. METHODS: Data from the SEER Patterns of Care studies were used to identify women diagnosed with histologically confirmed DCIS who underwent cancer‐directed surgery in the years 1991, 1995, 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using weighted multivariable logistic regression to evaluate cancer‐directed surgery and use of post‐operative radiation therapy (PORT). RESULTS: Of the 3337 patients who met inclusion criteria, 27% underwent mastectomy, 26% underwent breast‐conserving surgery (BCS) without PORT, and 47% underwent BCS with PORT. After adjustment for other covariates, there was no difference in the likelihood of receiving mastectomy between rural and urban patients (aOR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.37–1.14). However, rural residents were more likely than urban residents to have mastectomy during 1991/1995 (aOR = 1.78; 95% CI 1.09–2.91; p (interaction) = 0.022). Across all diagnosis years, patients residing in rural areas were less likely to receive PORT following BCS compared to urban patients (aOR = 0.35; 95% CI 0.18–0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Omission of PORT following BCS remains high among rural patients despite evidence that PORT leads to a significant reduction in the risk of local recurrence. Further research is needed to examine the impact of rural residence on treatment choices and develop methods to ensure equitable care among all breast cancer patients. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9160801/ /pubmed/35146946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4605 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Riley, Danielle
Chrischilles, Elizabeth A.
Lizarraga, Ingrid M.
Charlton, Mary
Smith, Brian J.
Lynch, Charles F.
Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis
title Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis
title_full Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis
title_fullStr Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis
title_full_unstemmed Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis
title_short Rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: A patterns of care analysis
title_sort rural–urban differences in secular trends of locoregional treatment for ductal carcinoma in situ: a patterns of care analysis
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35146946
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4605
work_keys_str_mv AT rileydanielle ruralurbandifferencesinseculartrendsoflocoregionaltreatmentforductalcarcinomainsituapatternsofcareanalysis
AT chrischilleselizabetha ruralurbandifferencesinseculartrendsoflocoregionaltreatmentforductalcarcinomainsituapatternsofcareanalysis
AT lizarragaingridm ruralurbandifferencesinseculartrendsoflocoregionaltreatmentforductalcarcinomainsituapatternsofcareanalysis
AT charltonmary ruralurbandifferencesinseculartrendsoflocoregionaltreatmentforductalcarcinomainsituapatternsofcareanalysis
AT smithbrianj ruralurbandifferencesinseculartrendsoflocoregionaltreatmentforductalcarcinomainsituapatternsofcareanalysis
AT lynchcharlesf ruralurbandifferencesinseculartrendsoflocoregionaltreatmentforductalcarcinomainsituapatternsofcareanalysis