Cargando…
The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review
Recently approved migraine preventive therapies facilitate rapid control of migraine activity, potentially improving patients’ lives and minimizing the societal burden of migraine. This review synthesizes available evidence on rates and timing of early onset of migraine prevention and identifies pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35662957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221095902 |
_version_ | 1784719371366563840 |
---|---|
author | Gottschalk, Christopher Buse, Dawn C. Marmura, Michael J. Torphy, Bradley Pavlovic, Jelena M. Dumas, Paula K. Lalvani, Nim Blumenfeld, Andrew |
author_facet | Gottschalk, Christopher Buse, Dawn C. Marmura, Michael J. Torphy, Bradley Pavlovic, Jelena M. Dumas, Paula K. Lalvani, Nim Blumenfeld, Andrew |
author_sort | Gottschalk, Christopher |
collection | PubMed |
description | Recently approved migraine preventive therapies facilitate rapid control of migraine activity, potentially improving patients’ lives and minimizing the societal burden of migraine. This review synthesizes available evidence on rates and timing of early onset of migraine prevention and identifies patient-level outcomes related to early onset prevention. This evidence-based scoping review identified all available clinical trial evidence regarding the early onset of prevention of migraine, under the hypothesis ‘Patients with migraine (episodic or chronic) report additional benefits when receiving an approved migraine preventive treatment that demonstrates an early onset of prevention’. Early onset of prevention was defined as migraine preventive benefits within 30 days post-administration. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for publications between 1988 and 2020. Overall, 16 publications described 18 studies. All studies were conducted in approved treatments [four anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and one chemodenervation agent] in patients with episodic/chronic migraine; no publications were identified for traditional oral agents for early migraine prevention. Compared to placebo, erenumab (three studies) reduced weekly migraine days within 1 week; fremanezumab (six studies) increased reports of no headache of at least moderate severity on Day 1 and significantly reduced migraine frequency within 1 week; galcanezumab (three studies) significantly reduced the mean number of patients with migraine beginning Day 1 and each day of the first week; eptinezumab (four studies) significantly reduced migraine attack likelihood on Day 1 by > 50% versus baseline; and onabotulinumtoxinA (two studies) reduced headache and migraine days within 1 week. Four publications described function, disability, and quality of life improvements as early as Week 4; none reported cost–benefit. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab) and a chemodenervation agent (onabotulinumtoxinA) provide clinically relevant benefits during the first treatment week. Literature describing clinically relevant benefits regarding early onset of prevention in patients with migraine is limited. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9160905 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91609052022-06-03 The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review Gottschalk, Christopher Buse, Dawn C. Marmura, Michael J. Torphy, Bradley Pavlovic, Jelena M. Dumas, Paula K. Lalvani, Nim Blumenfeld, Andrew Ther Adv Neurol Disord Review Recently approved migraine preventive therapies facilitate rapid control of migraine activity, potentially improving patients’ lives and minimizing the societal burden of migraine. This review synthesizes available evidence on rates and timing of early onset of migraine prevention and identifies patient-level outcomes related to early onset prevention. This evidence-based scoping review identified all available clinical trial evidence regarding the early onset of prevention of migraine, under the hypothesis ‘Patients with migraine (episodic or chronic) report additional benefits when receiving an approved migraine preventive treatment that demonstrates an early onset of prevention’. Early onset of prevention was defined as migraine preventive benefits within 30 days post-administration. PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL were searched for publications between 1988 and 2020. Overall, 16 publications described 18 studies. All studies were conducted in approved treatments [four anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies and one chemodenervation agent] in patients with episodic/chronic migraine; no publications were identified for traditional oral agents for early migraine prevention. Compared to placebo, erenumab (three studies) reduced weekly migraine days within 1 week; fremanezumab (six studies) increased reports of no headache of at least moderate severity on Day 1 and significantly reduced migraine frequency within 1 week; galcanezumab (three studies) significantly reduced the mean number of patients with migraine beginning Day 1 and each day of the first week; eptinezumab (four studies) significantly reduced migraine attack likelihood on Day 1 by > 50% versus baseline; and onabotulinumtoxinA (two studies) reduced headache and migraine days within 1 week. Four publications described function, disability, and quality of life improvements as early as Week 4; none reported cost–benefit. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab, and eptinezumab) and a chemodenervation agent (onabotulinumtoxinA) provide clinically relevant benefits during the first treatment week. Literature describing clinically relevant benefits regarding early onset of prevention in patients with migraine is limited. SAGE Publications 2022-05-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9160905/ /pubmed/35662957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221095902 Text en © The Author(s), 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Review Gottschalk, Christopher Buse, Dawn C. Marmura, Michael J. Torphy, Bradley Pavlovic, Jelena M. Dumas, Paula K. Lalvani, Nim Blumenfeld, Andrew The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review |
title | The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review |
title_full | The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review |
title_fullStr | The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review |
title_full_unstemmed | The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review |
title_short | The importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review |
title_sort | importance of an early onset of migraine prevention: an evidence-based, hypothesis-driven scoping literature review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160905/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35662957 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17562864221095902 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gottschalkchristopher theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT busedawnc theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT marmuramichaelj theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT torphybradley theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT pavlovicjelenam theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT dumaspaulak theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT lalvaninim theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT blumenfeldandrew theimportanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT gottschalkchristopher importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT busedawnc importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT marmuramichaelj importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT torphybradley importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT pavlovicjelenam importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT dumaspaulak importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT lalvaninim importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview AT blumenfeldandrew importanceofanearlyonsetofmigrainepreventionanevidencebasedhypothesisdrivenscopingliteraturereview |