Cargando…

Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Currently, promoted vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 are being given out globally. However, the occurrence of numerous COVID-19 variants has hindered the goal of rapid mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic by effective mass vaccinations. The real-word effectiveness of the current vaccines a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Kai, Wang, Lin, Li, Mingzhe, Xie, Bing, He, Lu, Wang, Meiyu, Zhang, Rumin, Hou, Nianzong, Zhang, Yi, Jia, Fusen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.820544
_version_ 1784719376767778816
author Wang, Kai
Wang, Lin
Li, Mingzhe
Xie, Bing
He, Lu
Wang, Meiyu
Zhang, Rumin
Hou, Nianzong
Zhang, Yi
Jia, Fusen
author_facet Wang, Kai
Wang, Lin
Li, Mingzhe
Xie, Bing
He, Lu
Wang, Meiyu
Zhang, Rumin
Hou, Nianzong
Zhang, Yi
Jia, Fusen
author_sort Wang, Kai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently, promoted vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 are being given out globally. However, the occurrence of numerous COVID-19 variants has hindered the goal of rapid mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic by effective mass vaccinations. The real-word effectiveness of the current vaccines against COVID-19 variants has not been assessed by published reviews. Therefore, our study evaluated the overall effectiveness of current vaccines and the differences between the various vaccines and variants. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv were searched to screen the eligible studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the Egger test were applied to estimate the quality of the literature and any publication bias, respectively. The pooled incident rates of different variants after vaccination were estimated by single-arm analysis. Meanwhile, the pooled efficacies of various vaccines against variants were evaluated by two-arm analysis using odds ratios (ORs) and vaccine effectiveness (VE). RESULTS: A total of 6,118 studies were identified initially and 44 articles were included. We found that the overall incidence of variants post first/second vaccine were 0.07 and 0.03, respectively. The VE of the incidence of variants post first vaccine between the vaccine and the placebo or unvaccinated population was 40% and post second vaccine was 96%, respectively. The sub-single-arm analysis showed a low prevalence rate of COVID-19 variants after specific vaccination with the pooled incidence below 0.10 in most subgroups. Meanwhile, the sub-two-arm analysis indicated that most current vaccines had a good or moderate preventive effect on certain variants considering that the VE in these subgroups was between 66 and 95%, which was broadly in line with the results of the sub-single-arm analysis. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that the current vaccines that are used globally could prevent COVID-19 infection and restrict the spread of variants to a great extent. We would also support maximizing vaccine uptake with two doses, as the effectiveness of which was more marked compared with one dose. Although the mRNA vaccine was the most effective against variants according to our study, specific vaccines should be taken into account based on the local dominant prevalence of variants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9160927
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91609272022-06-03 Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Kai Wang, Lin Li, Mingzhe Xie, Bing He, Lu Wang, Meiyu Zhang, Rumin Hou, Nianzong Zhang, Yi Jia, Fusen Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Currently, promoted vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 are being given out globally. However, the occurrence of numerous COVID-19 variants has hindered the goal of rapid mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic by effective mass vaccinations. The real-word effectiveness of the current vaccines against COVID-19 variants has not been assessed by published reviews. Therefore, our study evaluated the overall effectiveness of current vaccines and the differences between the various vaccines and variants. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv were searched to screen the eligible studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the Egger test were applied to estimate the quality of the literature and any publication bias, respectively. The pooled incident rates of different variants after vaccination were estimated by single-arm analysis. Meanwhile, the pooled efficacies of various vaccines against variants were evaluated by two-arm analysis using odds ratios (ORs) and vaccine effectiveness (VE). RESULTS: A total of 6,118 studies were identified initially and 44 articles were included. We found that the overall incidence of variants post first/second vaccine were 0.07 and 0.03, respectively. The VE of the incidence of variants post first vaccine between the vaccine and the placebo or unvaccinated population was 40% and post second vaccine was 96%, respectively. The sub-single-arm analysis showed a low prevalence rate of COVID-19 variants after specific vaccination with the pooled incidence below 0.10 in most subgroups. Meanwhile, the sub-two-arm analysis indicated that most current vaccines had a good or moderate preventive effect on certain variants considering that the VE in these subgroups was between 66 and 95%, which was broadly in line with the results of the sub-single-arm analysis. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that the current vaccines that are used globally could prevent COVID-19 infection and restrict the spread of variants to a great extent. We would also support maximizing vaccine uptake with two doses, as the effectiveness of which was more marked compared with one dose. Although the mRNA vaccine was the most effective against variants according to our study, specific vaccines should be taken into account based on the local dominant prevalence of variants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9160927/ /pubmed/35665358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.820544 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Wang, Li, Xie, He, Wang, Zhang, Hou, Zhang and Jia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Medicine
Wang, Kai
Wang, Lin
Li, Mingzhe
Xie, Bing
He, Lu
Wang, Meiyu
Zhang, Rumin
Hou, Nianzong
Zhang, Yi
Jia, Fusen
Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort real-word effectiveness of global covid-19 vaccines against sars-cov-2 variants: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160927/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665358
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.820544
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkai realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wanglin realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT limingzhe realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT xiebing realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT helu realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangmeiyu realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangrumin realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hounianzong realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangyi realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT jiafusen realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis