Cargando…
Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Currently, promoted vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 are being given out globally. However, the occurrence of numerous COVID-19 variants has hindered the goal of rapid mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic by effective mass vaccinations. The real-word effectiveness of the current vaccines a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.820544 |
_version_ | 1784719376767778816 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Kai Wang, Lin Li, Mingzhe Xie, Bing He, Lu Wang, Meiyu Zhang, Rumin Hou, Nianzong Zhang, Yi Jia, Fusen |
author_facet | Wang, Kai Wang, Lin Li, Mingzhe Xie, Bing He, Lu Wang, Meiyu Zhang, Rumin Hou, Nianzong Zhang, Yi Jia, Fusen |
author_sort | Wang, Kai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Currently, promoted vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 are being given out globally. However, the occurrence of numerous COVID-19 variants has hindered the goal of rapid mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic by effective mass vaccinations. The real-word effectiveness of the current vaccines against COVID-19 variants has not been assessed by published reviews. Therefore, our study evaluated the overall effectiveness of current vaccines and the differences between the various vaccines and variants. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv were searched to screen the eligible studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the Egger test were applied to estimate the quality of the literature and any publication bias, respectively. The pooled incident rates of different variants after vaccination were estimated by single-arm analysis. Meanwhile, the pooled efficacies of various vaccines against variants were evaluated by two-arm analysis using odds ratios (ORs) and vaccine effectiveness (VE). RESULTS: A total of 6,118 studies were identified initially and 44 articles were included. We found that the overall incidence of variants post first/second vaccine were 0.07 and 0.03, respectively. The VE of the incidence of variants post first vaccine between the vaccine and the placebo or unvaccinated population was 40% and post second vaccine was 96%, respectively. The sub-single-arm analysis showed a low prevalence rate of COVID-19 variants after specific vaccination with the pooled incidence below 0.10 in most subgroups. Meanwhile, the sub-two-arm analysis indicated that most current vaccines had a good or moderate preventive effect on certain variants considering that the VE in these subgroups was between 66 and 95%, which was broadly in line with the results of the sub-single-arm analysis. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that the current vaccines that are used globally could prevent COVID-19 infection and restrict the spread of variants to a great extent. We would also support maximizing vaccine uptake with two doses, as the effectiveness of which was more marked compared with one dose. Although the mRNA vaccine was the most effective against variants according to our study, specific vaccines should be taken into account based on the local dominant prevalence of variants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9160927 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91609272022-06-03 Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Wang, Kai Wang, Lin Li, Mingzhe Xie, Bing He, Lu Wang, Meiyu Zhang, Rumin Hou, Nianzong Zhang, Yi Jia, Fusen Front Med (Lausanne) Medicine BACKGROUND: Currently, promoted vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 are being given out globally. However, the occurrence of numerous COVID-19 variants has hindered the goal of rapid mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic by effective mass vaccinations. The real-word effectiveness of the current vaccines against COVID-19 variants has not been assessed by published reviews. Therefore, our study evaluated the overall effectiveness of current vaccines and the differences between the various vaccines and variants. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, medRxiv, bioRxiv, and arXiv were searched to screen the eligible studies. The Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the Egger test were applied to estimate the quality of the literature and any publication bias, respectively. The pooled incident rates of different variants after vaccination were estimated by single-arm analysis. Meanwhile, the pooled efficacies of various vaccines against variants were evaluated by two-arm analysis using odds ratios (ORs) and vaccine effectiveness (VE). RESULTS: A total of 6,118 studies were identified initially and 44 articles were included. We found that the overall incidence of variants post first/second vaccine were 0.07 and 0.03, respectively. The VE of the incidence of variants post first vaccine between the vaccine and the placebo or unvaccinated population was 40% and post second vaccine was 96%, respectively. The sub-single-arm analysis showed a low prevalence rate of COVID-19 variants after specific vaccination with the pooled incidence below 0.10 in most subgroups. Meanwhile, the sub-two-arm analysis indicated that most current vaccines had a good or moderate preventive effect on certain variants considering that the VE in these subgroups was between 66 and 95%, which was broadly in line with the results of the sub-single-arm analysis. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that the current vaccines that are used globally could prevent COVID-19 infection and restrict the spread of variants to a great extent. We would also support maximizing vaccine uptake with two doses, as the effectiveness of which was more marked compared with one dose. Although the mRNA vaccine was the most effective against variants according to our study, specific vaccines should be taken into account based on the local dominant prevalence of variants. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-19 /pmc/articles/PMC9160927/ /pubmed/35665358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.820544 Text en Copyright © 2022 Wang, Wang, Li, Xie, He, Wang, Zhang, Hou, Zhang and Jia. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Medicine Wang, Kai Wang, Lin Li, Mingzhe Xie, Bing He, Lu Wang, Meiyu Zhang, Rumin Hou, Nianzong Zhang, Yi Jia, Fusen Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Real-Word Effectiveness of Global COVID-19 Vaccines Against SARS-CoV-2 Variants: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | real-word effectiveness of global covid-19 vaccines against sars-cov-2 variants: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160927/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665358 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.820544 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangkai realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wanglin realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT limingzhe realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT xiebing realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT helu realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangmeiyu realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangrumin realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hounianzong realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangyi realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT jiafusen realwordeffectivenessofglobalcovid19vaccinesagainstsarscov2variantsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |