Cargando…

Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation

OBJECTIVES: Ultrasonography of the caudal vena cava (CVC) has been previously established to assess fluid status in dogs but not in cats. The aim of this study was to determine CVC diameter changes during feline blood donation. METHODS: Inter- and intra-observer variability were assessed in 11 clien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sänger, Florian, Dorsch, Roswitha, Hartmann, Katrin, Dörfelt, René
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X211028838
_version_ 1784719378430820352
author Sänger, Florian
Dorsch, Roswitha
Hartmann, Katrin
Dörfelt, René
author_facet Sänger, Florian
Dorsch, Roswitha
Hartmann, Katrin
Dörfelt, René
author_sort Sänger, Florian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ultrasonography of the caudal vena cava (CVC) has been previously established to assess fluid status in dogs but not in cats. The aim of this study was to determine CVC diameter changes during feline blood donation. METHODS: Inter- and intra-observer variability were assessed in 11 client-owned cats. Minimal and maximal CVC diameters were assessed longitudinally in the subxiphoid view (SV) and right paralumbar view (PV), and transversely in the right hepatic intercostal view (HV). Eighteen client-owned, healthy, anaesthetised cats were evaluated during 21 blood donation procedures of 10 ml/kg in the same anatomical locations before (T0) and after (T1) blood donation, and after volume resuscitation with 30 ml/kg lactated Ringer’s solution (T2). The CVC index was calculated. RESULTS: Intra-observer variability was acceptable for all probe positions, except for the HV, whereas inter-observer variability was considered unacceptable for all probe positions. Complete measurements were obtained during 21 blood donations at T0, T1 and T2 at the SV, during 18/21 blood donations at the HV and during 16/21 blood donations at the PV. At the SV, the minimal CVC diameter between T1 and T2 (P <0.001), and the maximal CVC diameter between T0 and T1 and between T1 and T2 (P <0.001) were significantly different. At the HV, the minimal vertical diameter, maximal vertical diameter and minimal horizontal diameter were different between all timepoints (P <0.001). The maximal horizontal diameter was different between T1 and T2 (P = 0.002). At the PV, both diameters were different between all timepoints (P <0.001). The CVC index was not different between timepoints. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Significant probe position dependent CVC diameter changes with marked overlap were observed before and after blood donation, and after fluid bolus. No absolute CVC diameter could be used to indicate hypovolaemia. Ultrasonographic assessment of the feline CVC is highly operator-dependent. The CVC index is not useful in cats.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9160942
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91609422022-06-03 Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation Sänger, Florian Dorsch, Roswitha Hartmann, Katrin Dörfelt, René J Feline Med Surg Original Articles OBJECTIVES: Ultrasonography of the caudal vena cava (CVC) has been previously established to assess fluid status in dogs but not in cats. The aim of this study was to determine CVC diameter changes during feline blood donation. METHODS: Inter- and intra-observer variability were assessed in 11 client-owned cats. Minimal and maximal CVC diameters were assessed longitudinally in the subxiphoid view (SV) and right paralumbar view (PV), and transversely in the right hepatic intercostal view (HV). Eighteen client-owned, healthy, anaesthetised cats were evaluated during 21 blood donation procedures of 10 ml/kg in the same anatomical locations before (T0) and after (T1) blood donation, and after volume resuscitation with 30 ml/kg lactated Ringer’s solution (T2). The CVC index was calculated. RESULTS: Intra-observer variability was acceptable for all probe positions, except for the HV, whereas inter-observer variability was considered unacceptable for all probe positions. Complete measurements were obtained during 21 blood donations at T0, T1 and T2 at the SV, during 18/21 blood donations at the HV and during 16/21 blood donations at the PV. At the SV, the minimal CVC diameter between T1 and T2 (P <0.001), and the maximal CVC diameter between T0 and T1 and between T1 and T2 (P <0.001) were significantly different. At the HV, the minimal vertical diameter, maximal vertical diameter and minimal horizontal diameter were different between all timepoints (P <0.001). The maximal horizontal diameter was different between T1 and T2 (P = 0.002). At the PV, both diameters were different between all timepoints (P <0.001). The CVC index was not different between timepoints. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Significant probe position dependent CVC diameter changes with marked overlap were observed before and after blood donation, and after fluid bolus. No absolute CVC diameter could be used to indicate hypovolaemia. Ultrasonographic assessment of the feline CVC is highly operator-dependent. The CVC index is not useful in cats. SAGE Publications 2021-07-27 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9160942/ /pubmed/34313488 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X211028838 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Sänger, Florian
Dorsch, Roswitha
Hartmann, Katrin
Dörfelt, René
Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation
title Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation
title_full Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation
title_fullStr Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation
title_short Ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation
title_sort ultrasonographic assessment of the caudal vena cava diameter in cats during blood donation
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9160942/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34313488
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1098612X211028838
work_keys_str_mv AT sangerflorian ultrasonographicassessmentofthecaudalvenacavadiameterincatsduringblooddonation
AT dorschroswitha ultrasonographicassessmentofthecaudalvenacavadiameterincatsduringblooddonation
AT hartmannkatrin ultrasonographicassessmentofthecaudalvenacavadiameterincatsduringblooddonation
AT dorfeltrene ultrasonographicassessmentofthecaudalvenacavadiameterincatsduringblooddonation