Cargando…
A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the value of a modified chest tube drainage strategy to a traditional drainage strategy in single‐port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection. METHODS: From January 2019 to July 2021, we collected clinical data on 405 patients who underwent single‐port thoracosc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14438 |
_version_ | 1784719458983477248 |
---|---|
author | Xu, Guobing Du, Jianting Zhang, Jiarong Chen, Hao Zheng, Bin Yang, Zhang Chen, Chun |
author_facet | Xu, Guobing Du, Jianting Zhang, Jiarong Chen, Hao Zheng, Bin Yang, Zhang Chen, Chun |
author_sort | Xu, Guobing |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the value of a modified chest tube drainage strategy to a traditional drainage strategy in single‐port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection. METHODS: From January 2019 to July 2021, we collected clinical data on 405 patients who underwent single‐port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection in the No.1 Department of Thoracic Surgery at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, with 121 (29.9%) cases in the modified drainage strategy group and 284 (70.1%) cases in the traditional drainage strategy group. The propensity score matching method (Match Ratio = 1:1) was used to reduce differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 120 matched pairs (240 patients) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in general clinical characteristics between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in intraoperative factors except for operative times (71.42 ± 22.98 min vs. 86.80 ± 36.75 min, p < 0.001). In terms of postoperative factors, there were significant differences in postoperative chest tube duration (0.00 ± 0.00 h vs. 32.68 ± 18.51 h, p < 0.001), total drainage volume (143.03 ± 118.33 ml vs. 187.73 ± 140.82 ml, p = 0.008), postoperative hospital stay (2.61 ± 0.70 days vs. 3.27 ± 1.88 days, p < 0.001), number of additional pain relief (0.14 ± 0.40 vs. 0.42 ± 0.74, p < 0.001), facial pain score (2.7 ± 1.8 vs. 3.6 ± 2.7, p = 0.005) and adverse events (p = 0.046). Furthermore, there was a statistical difference between the two groups regarding CTCAE grade‐1 complication, but no statistical difference in CTCAE grade‐2 complication. CONCLUSIONS: A modified drainage strategy in single‐port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection is safe and feasible, allowing for less postoperative rehabilitation time, pain relief, reduced postoperative pleural effusion, and reduced clinical workload. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9161322 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91613222022-06-04 A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection Xu, Guobing Du, Jianting Zhang, Jiarong Chen, Hao Zheng, Bin Yang, Zhang Chen, Chun Thorac Cancer Original Articles PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the value of a modified chest tube drainage strategy to a traditional drainage strategy in single‐port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection. METHODS: From January 2019 to July 2021, we collected clinical data on 405 patients who underwent single‐port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection in the No.1 Department of Thoracic Surgery at Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, with 121 (29.9%) cases in the modified drainage strategy group and 284 (70.1%) cases in the traditional drainage strategy group. The propensity score matching method (Match Ratio = 1:1) was used to reduce differences in clinical characteristics between the two groups. RESULTS: Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 120 matched pairs (240 patients) were included in the study. There was no significant difference in general clinical characteristics between the two groups. There was no statistical difference in intraoperative factors except for operative times (71.42 ± 22.98 min vs. 86.80 ± 36.75 min, p < 0.001). In terms of postoperative factors, there were significant differences in postoperative chest tube duration (0.00 ± 0.00 h vs. 32.68 ± 18.51 h, p < 0.001), total drainage volume (143.03 ± 118.33 ml vs. 187.73 ± 140.82 ml, p = 0.008), postoperative hospital stay (2.61 ± 0.70 days vs. 3.27 ± 1.88 days, p < 0.001), number of additional pain relief (0.14 ± 0.40 vs. 0.42 ± 0.74, p < 0.001), facial pain score (2.7 ± 1.8 vs. 3.6 ± 2.7, p = 0.005) and adverse events (p = 0.046). Furthermore, there was a statistical difference between the two groups regarding CTCAE grade‐1 complication, but no statistical difference in CTCAE grade‐2 complication. CONCLUSIONS: A modified drainage strategy in single‐port thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection is safe and feasible, allowing for less postoperative rehabilitation time, pain relief, reduced postoperative pleural effusion, and reduced clinical workload. John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd 2022-04-28 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9161322/ /pubmed/35481947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14438 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Thoracic Cancer published by China Lung Oncology Group and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Xu, Guobing Du, Jianting Zhang, Jiarong Chen, Hao Zheng, Bin Yang, Zhang Chen, Chun A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection |
title | A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection |
title_full | A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection |
title_fullStr | A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection |
title_full_unstemmed | A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection |
title_short | A propensity sore‐matched study: Applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection |
title_sort | propensity sore‐matched study: applying a modified chest tube drainage strategy in rapid rehabilitation following uni‐portal thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge resection |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161322/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35481947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xuguobing apropensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT dujianting apropensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT zhangjiarong apropensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT chenhao apropensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT zhengbin apropensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT yangzhang apropensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT chenchun apropensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT xuguobing propensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT dujianting propensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT zhangjiarong propensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT chenhao propensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT zhengbin propensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT yangzhang propensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection AT chenchun propensitysorematchedstudyapplyingamodifiedchesttubedrainagestrategyinrapidrehabilitationfollowinguniportalthoracoscopicpulmonarywedgeresection |