Cargando…

Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for skin thickness assessment in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS); however, inter- and intra-rater variation can arise due to subjective methods and inexperience. The study aimed to determine the inter- and intra-rater variability of mRS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pongkulkiat, Patnarin, Thinkhamrop, Bandit, Mahakkanukrauh, Ajanee, Suwannaroj, Siraphop, Foocharoen, Chingching
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35650637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00262-2
_version_ 1784719493994381312
author Pongkulkiat, Patnarin
Thinkhamrop, Bandit
Mahakkanukrauh, Ajanee
Suwannaroj, Siraphop
Foocharoen, Chingching
author_facet Pongkulkiat, Patnarin
Thinkhamrop, Bandit
Mahakkanukrauh, Ajanee
Suwannaroj, Siraphop
Foocharoen, Chingching
author_sort Pongkulkiat, Patnarin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The gold standard for skin thickness assessment in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS); however, inter- and intra-rater variation can arise due to subjective methods and inexperience. The study aimed to determine the inter- and intra-rater variability of mRSS assessment using a skin model. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted between January and December 2020 at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Thirty-six skin sites of 8 SSc patients underwent mRSS assessment: 4 times the first day and 1 time over the next 4 weeks by the same 10 raters. No skin model for mRSS assessment was used for the first two assessments, while one was used for the remaining three rounds of assessments. The Latin square design and Kappa statistic were used to determine inter- and intra-rater variability. RESULTS: The kappa agreement for inter-rater variability improved when the skin model was used (from 0.4 to 0.5; 25%). The improvement in inter-rater variability was seen in the non-expert group, for which the kappa agreement rose from 0.3 to 0.5 (a change of 66.7%). Intra-rater variability did not change (kappa remained at 0.9), and the long-term effect of using a skin model slightly decreased by week 4 (Δkappa 0.9–0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Using a skin model could be used to improve inter-rater variation in mRSS assessment, especially in the non-expert group. The model should be considered a reference for mRSS assessment in clinical practice and health education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00262-2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9161481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91614812022-06-03 Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis Pongkulkiat, Patnarin Thinkhamrop, Bandit Mahakkanukrauh, Ajanee Suwannaroj, Siraphop Foocharoen, Chingching BMC Rheumatol Research Article BACKGROUND: The gold standard for skin thickness assessment in systemic sclerosis (SSc) is the modified Rodnan skin score (mRSS); however, inter- and intra-rater variation can arise due to subjective methods and inexperience. The study aimed to determine the inter- and intra-rater variability of mRSS assessment using a skin model. METHODS: A comparative study was conducted between January and December 2020 at Srinagarind Hospital, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. Thirty-six skin sites of 8 SSc patients underwent mRSS assessment: 4 times the first day and 1 time over the next 4 weeks by the same 10 raters. No skin model for mRSS assessment was used for the first two assessments, while one was used for the remaining three rounds of assessments. The Latin square design and Kappa statistic were used to determine inter- and intra-rater variability. RESULTS: The kappa agreement for inter-rater variability improved when the skin model was used (from 0.4 to 0.5; 25%). The improvement in inter-rater variability was seen in the non-expert group, for which the kappa agreement rose from 0.3 to 0.5 (a change of 66.7%). Intra-rater variability did not change (kappa remained at 0.9), and the long-term effect of using a skin model slightly decreased by week 4 (Δkappa 0.9–0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Using a skin model could be used to improve inter-rater variation in mRSS assessment, especially in the non-expert group. The model should be considered a reference for mRSS assessment in clinical practice and health education. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41927-022-00262-2. BioMed Central 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9161481/ /pubmed/35650637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00262-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pongkulkiat, Patnarin
Thinkhamrop, Bandit
Mahakkanukrauh, Ajanee
Suwannaroj, Siraphop
Foocharoen, Chingching
Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis
title Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis
title_full Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis
title_fullStr Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis
title_full_unstemmed Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis
title_short Skin model for improving the reliability of the modified Rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis
title_sort skin model for improving the reliability of the modified rodnan skin score for systemic sclerosis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35650637
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41927-022-00262-2
work_keys_str_mv AT pongkulkiatpatnarin skinmodelforimprovingthereliabilityofthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreforsystemicsclerosis
AT thinkhamropbandit skinmodelforimprovingthereliabilityofthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreforsystemicsclerosis
AT mahakkanukrauhajanee skinmodelforimprovingthereliabilityofthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreforsystemicsclerosis
AT suwannarojsiraphop skinmodelforimprovingthereliabilityofthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreforsystemicsclerosis
AT foocharoenchingching skinmodelforimprovingthereliabilityofthemodifiedrodnanskinscoreforsystemicsclerosis