Cargando…
Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The outcome of non-surgical treatment is generally good, but the treatment course can be long and painful with approximately a quarter of the patients acquiring a nonunion. Both surgical and non-surgical treatment can have disabling consequences such as nerve injury, infection, and nonun...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06317-6 |
_version_ | 1784719494240796672 |
---|---|
author | Karimi, Dennis Brorson, Stig Midtgaard, Kaare S. Fjalestad, Tore Paulsen, Aksel Olerud, Per Ekholm, Carl Wolf, Olof Viberg, Bjarke |
author_facet | Karimi, Dennis Brorson, Stig Midtgaard, Kaare S. Fjalestad, Tore Paulsen, Aksel Olerud, Per Ekholm, Carl Wolf, Olof Viberg, Bjarke |
author_sort | Karimi, Dennis |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The outcome of non-surgical treatment is generally good, but the treatment course can be long and painful with approximately a quarter of the patients acquiring a nonunion. Both surgical and non-surgical treatment can have disabling consequences such as nerve injury, infection, and nonunion. The purpose of the study is to compare patient-reported outcomes after surgical and non-surgical treatment for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) is planned with two study groups (SHAFT-Young and SHAFT-Elderly). A total of 287 eligible acute humeral shaft fractures are scheduled to be recruited and randomly allocated to surgical or non-surgical treatment with the option of early crossover due to delayed union. The surgical method within the allocation is decided by the surgeon. The primary outcome is the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at 52 weeks, and is assessor blinded. The secondary outcomes are DASH score, EQ-5D-5L, pain assessed by visual analog score, Constant-Murley score including elbow range of motion, and anchor questions collected at all timepoints throughout the trial. All complications will be reported including; infection, nerve or vascular injury, surgical revisions (implant malpositioning, hardware failure, aseptic loosening, and peri-implant fracture), major adverse cardiovascular events, and mortality. DISCUSSION: The SHAFT trial is a pragmatic multicenter RCT, that will compare the effectiveness of the main strategies in humeral shaft fracture treatment. This will include a variety of fracture morphologies, while taking the dilemmas within the population into account by splitting the population by age and providing the orthopedic society with an interval for early crossover surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT04574336. Registered on 5 October 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06317-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9161482 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91614822022-06-03 Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial Karimi, Dennis Brorson, Stig Midtgaard, Kaare S. Fjalestad, Tore Paulsen, Aksel Olerud, Per Ekholm, Carl Wolf, Olof Viberg, Bjarke Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: The outcome of non-surgical treatment is generally good, but the treatment course can be long and painful with approximately a quarter of the patients acquiring a nonunion. Both surgical and non-surgical treatment can have disabling consequences such as nerve injury, infection, and nonunion. The purpose of the study is to compare patient-reported outcomes after surgical and non-surgical treatment for humeral shaft fractures. METHODS: A pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) is planned with two study groups (SHAFT-Young and SHAFT-Elderly). A total of 287 eligible acute humeral shaft fractures are scheduled to be recruited and randomly allocated to surgical or non-surgical treatment with the option of early crossover due to delayed union. The surgical method within the allocation is decided by the surgeon. The primary outcome is the Disability of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score at 52 weeks, and is assessor blinded. The secondary outcomes are DASH score, EQ-5D-5L, pain assessed by visual analog score, Constant-Murley score including elbow range of motion, and anchor questions collected at all timepoints throughout the trial. All complications will be reported including; infection, nerve or vascular injury, surgical revisions (implant malpositioning, hardware failure, aseptic loosening, and peri-implant fracture), major adverse cardiovascular events, and mortality. DISCUSSION: The SHAFT trial is a pragmatic multicenter RCT, that will compare the effectiveness of the main strategies in humeral shaft fracture treatment. This will include a variety of fracture morphologies, while taking the dilemmas within the population into account by splitting the population by age and providing the orthopedic society with an interval for early crossover surgery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.govNCT04574336. Registered on 5 October 2020. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06317-6. BioMed Central 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9161482/ /pubmed/35655280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06317-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Karimi, Dennis Brorson, Stig Midtgaard, Kaare S. Fjalestad, Tore Paulsen, Aksel Olerud, Per Ekholm, Carl Wolf, Olof Viberg, Bjarke Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title | Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral SHAFT fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the Scandinavian Humeral diAphyseal Fracture Trial (SHAFT)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | surgical versus non-surgical treatment of humeral shaft fractures compared by a patient-reported outcome: the scandinavian humeral diaphyseal fracture trial (shaft)—a study protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161482/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655280 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06317-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karimidennis surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brorsonstig surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT midtgaardkaares surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT fjalestadtore surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT paulsenaksel surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT olerudper surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT ekholmcarl surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wolfolof surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT vibergbjarke surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT surgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentofhumeralshaftfracturescomparedbyapatientreportedoutcomethescandinavianhumeraldiaphysealfracturetrialshaftastudyprotocolforapragmaticrandomizedcontrolledtrial |