Cargando…
Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory
The “Too Perfect Theory” states that if a trick is too perfect, it might paradoxically become less impressive, or give away its secret method. This theory suggests that an increased impossibility results in a less magical effect. The Too Perfect Theory is often applied to magic effects, but it confl...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
PeerJ Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663521 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13449 |
_version_ | 1784719558364364800 |
---|---|
author | Pailhès, Alice Lee, Kole Kuhn, Gustav |
author_facet | Pailhès, Alice Lee, Kole Kuhn, Gustav |
author_sort | Pailhès, Alice |
collection | PubMed |
description | The “Too Perfect Theory” states that if a trick is too perfect, it might paradoxically become less impressive, or give away its secret method. This theory suggests that an increased impossibility results in a less magical effect. The Too Perfect Theory is often applied to magic effects, but it conflicts with recent scientific investigations showing that participants’ level of enjoyment of a magic performance is positively related to their perceived impossibility of the trick. The current article investigated whether an imperfect magic performance is more impressive than a perfect one. Across two experiments, we studied whether participants enjoy a performance more if the effect is not perfect. We also examined the different types of explanations people give to these two types of performances. The results showed that participants enjoyed a perfect performance more than an imperfect one. However, consistently with the Too Perfect Theory, participants watching the perfect performance also discovered the correct method behind the magic trick more frequently and believed the performance was staged more often. Moreover, participants’ method explanation significantly impacted their reports about the performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9161811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | PeerJ Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91618112022-06-03 Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory Pailhès, Alice Lee, Kole Kuhn, Gustav PeerJ Neuroscience The “Too Perfect Theory” states that if a trick is too perfect, it might paradoxically become less impressive, or give away its secret method. This theory suggests that an increased impossibility results in a less magical effect. The Too Perfect Theory is often applied to magic effects, but it conflicts with recent scientific investigations showing that participants’ level of enjoyment of a magic performance is positively related to their perceived impossibility of the trick. The current article investigated whether an imperfect magic performance is more impressive than a perfect one. Across two experiments, we studied whether participants enjoy a performance more if the effect is not perfect. We also examined the different types of explanations people give to these two types of performances. The results showed that participants enjoyed a perfect performance more than an imperfect one. However, consistently with the Too Perfect Theory, participants watching the perfect performance also discovered the correct method behind the magic trick more frequently and believed the performance was staged more often. Moreover, participants’ method explanation significantly impacted their reports about the performance. PeerJ Inc. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9161811/ /pubmed/35663521 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13449 Text en ©2022 Pailhès et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Pailhès, Alice Lee, Kole Kuhn, Gustav Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory |
title | Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory |
title_full | Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory |
title_fullStr | Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory |
title_full_unstemmed | Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory |
title_short | Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory |
title_sort | too perfect to be good? an investigation of magicians’ too perfect theory |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663521 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13449 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pailhesalice tooperfecttobegoodaninvestigationofmagicianstooperfecttheory AT leekole tooperfecttobegoodaninvestigationofmagicianstooperfecttheory AT kuhngustav tooperfecttobegoodaninvestigationofmagicianstooperfecttheory |