Cargando…

Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory

The “Too Perfect Theory” states that if a trick is too perfect, it might paradoxically become less impressive, or give away its secret method. This theory suggests that an increased impossibility results in a less magical effect. The Too Perfect Theory is often applied to magic effects, but it confl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pailhès, Alice, Lee, Kole, Kuhn, Gustav
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663521
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13449
_version_ 1784719558364364800
author Pailhès, Alice
Lee, Kole
Kuhn, Gustav
author_facet Pailhès, Alice
Lee, Kole
Kuhn, Gustav
author_sort Pailhès, Alice
collection PubMed
description The “Too Perfect Theory” states that if a trick is too perfect, it might paradoxically become less impressive, or give away its secret method. This theory suggests that an increased impossibility results in a less magical effect. The Too Perfect Theory is often applied to magic effects, but it conflicts with recent scientific investigations showing that participants’ level of enjoyment of a magic performance is positively related to their perceived impossibility of the trick. The current article investigated whether an imperfect magic performance is more impressive than a perfect one. Across two experiments, we studied whether participants enjoy a performance more if the effect is not perfect. We also examined the different types of explanations people give to these two types of performances. The results showed that participants enjoyed a perfect performance more than an imperfect one. However, consistently with the Too Perfect Theory, participants watching the perfect performance also discovered the correct method behind the magic trick more frequently and believed the performance was staged more often. Moreover, participants’ method explanation significantly impacted their reports about the performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9161811
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91618112022-06-03 Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory Pailhès, Alice Lee, Kole Kuhn, Gustav PeerJ Neuroscience The “Too Perfect Theory” states that if a trick is too perfect, it might paradoxically become less impressive, or give away its secret method. This theory suggests that an increased impossibility results in a less magical effect. The Too Perfect Theory is often applied to magic effects, but it conflicts with recent scientific investigations showing that participants’ level of enjoyment of a magic performance is positively related to their perceived impossibility of the trick. The current article investigated whether an imperfect magic performance is more impressive than a perfect one. Across two experiments, we studied whether participants enjoy a performance more if the effect is not perfect. We also examined the different types of explanations people give to these two types of performances. The results showed that participants enjoyed a perfect performance more than an imperfect one. However, consistently with the Too Perfect Theory, participants watching the perfect performance also discovered the correct method behind the magic trick more frequently and believed the performance was staged more often. Moreover, participants’ method explanation significantly impacted their reports about the performance. PeerJ Inc. 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9161811/ /pubmed/35663521 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13449 Text en ©2022 Pailhès et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Pailhès, Alice
Lee, Kole
Kuhn, Gustav
Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory
title Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory
title_full Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory
title_fullStr Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory
title_full_unstemmed Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory
title_short Too perfect to be good? An investigation of magicians’ Too Perfect Theory
title_sort too perfect to be good? an investigation of magicians’ too perfect theory
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9161811/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35663521
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.13449
work_keys_str_mv AT pailhesalice tooperfecttobegoodaninvestigationofmagicianstooperfecttheory
AT leekole tooperfecttobegoodaninvestigationofmagicianstooperfecttheory
AT kuhngustav tooperfecttobegoodaninvestigationofmagicianstooperfecttheory