Cargando…

A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: The single patient (n-of-1) trial can be used to resolve therapeutic uncertainty for the individual patient. Treatment alternatives are systematically tested against each other, generating patient-specific data used to inform an individualized treatment plan. We hypothesize that clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samuel, Joyce P., Wootton, Susan H., Holder, Travis, Molony, Donald
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269387
_version_ 1784719670949969920
author Samuel, Joyce P.
Wootton, Susan H.
Holder, Travis
Molony, Donald
author_facet Samuel, Joyce P.
Wootton, Susan H.
Holder, Travis
Molony, Donald
author_sort Samuel, Joyce P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The single patient (n-of-1) trial can be used to resolve therapeutic uncertainty for the individual patient. Treatment alternatives are systematically tested against each other, generating patient-specific data used to inform an individualized treatment plan. We hypothesize that clinical decisions informed by n-of-1 trials improve patient outcomes compared to usual care. Our objective was to provide an overview of the clinical trial evidence on the effect of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of medical databases, trial registries, and gray literature was performed to identify trials assessing clinical outcomes in a group of patients undergoing an n-of-1 trial compared to those receiving usual care for any clinical condition. We abstracted elements related to study design and results and assessed risk of bias for both the overall randomized trials and the n-of-1 trials. The review was registered on PROSPERO. (CRD: 42020166490). FINDINGS: Twelve randomized trials of the n-of-1 approach were identified in conditions spanning chronic pain, osteoarthritis, chronic irreversible airflow limitation, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, statin intolerance, and hypertension. One trial showed a statistically significant benefit in the primary outcome. Only one reached the pre-specified sample size target. Secondary outcomes showed modest benefits, including decreasing medication use, fewer atrial fibrillation episodes, and improved patient satisfaction. INTERPRETATION: Very few trials have been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of n-of-1 trials in improving clinical outcomes, and most trials were underpowered for the primary outcome. Barriers to enrollment and retention in these trials should be explored, as well-powered randomized trials are needed to clarify the clinical impact of n-of-1 trials and assess their utility in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9162303
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91623032022-06-03 A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes Samuel, Joyce P. Wootton, Susan H. Holder, Travis Molony, Donald PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The single patient (n-of-1) trial can be used to resolve therapeutic uncertainty for the individual patient. Treatment alternatives are systematically tested against each other, generating patient-specific data used to inform an individualized treatment plan. We hypothesize that clinical decisions informed by n-of-1 trials improve patient outcomes compared to usual care. Our objective was to provide an overview of the clinical trial evidence on the effect of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of medical databases, trial registries, and gray literature was performed to identify trials assessing clinical outcomes in a group of patients undergoing an n-of-1 trial compared to those receiving usual care for any clinical condition. We abstracted elements related to study design and results and assessed risk of bias for both the overall randomized trials and the n-of-1 trials. The review was registered on PROSPERO. (CRD: 42020166490). FINDINGS: Twelve randomized trials of the n-of-1 approach were identified in conditions spanning chronic pain, osteoarthritis, chronic irreversible airflow limitation, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, statin intolerance, and hypertension. One trial showed a statistically significant benefit in the primary outcome. Only one reached the pre-specified sample size target. Secondary outcomes showed modest benefits, including decreasing medication use, fewer atrial fibrillation episodes, and improved patient satisfaction. INTERPRETATION: Very few trials have been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of n-of-1 trials in improving clinical outcomes, and most trials were underpowered for the primary outcome. Barriers to enrollment and retention in these trials should be explored, as well-powered randomized trials are needed to clarify the clinical impact of n-of-1 trials and assess their utility in clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9162303/ /pubmed/35653405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269387 Text en © 2022 Samuel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Samuel, Joyce P.
Wootton, Susan H.
Holder, Travis
Molony, Donald
A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
title A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
title_full A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
title_fullStr A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
title_full_unstemmed A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
title_short A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
title_sort scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162303/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269387
work_keys_str_mv AT samueljoycep ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes
AT woottonsusanh ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes
AT holdertravis ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes
AT molonydonald ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes
AT samueljoycep scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes
AT woottonsusanh scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes
AT holdertravis scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes
AT molonydonald scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes