Cargando…
A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes
BACKGROUND: The single patient (n-of-1) trial can be used to resolve therapeutic uncertainty for the individual patient. Treatment alternatives are systematically tested against each other, generating patient-specific data used to inform an individualized treatment plan. We hypothesize that clinical...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269387 |
_version_ | 1784719670949969920 |
---|---|
author | Samuel, Joyce P. Wootton, Susan H. Holder, Travis Molony, Donald |
author_facet | Samuel, Joyce P. Wootton, Susan H. Holder, Travis Molony, Donald |
author_sort | Samuel, Joyce P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The single patient (n-of-1) trial can be used to resolve therapeutic uncertainty for the individual patient. Treatment alternatives are systematically tested against each other, generating patient-specific data used to inform an individualized treatment plan. We hypothesize that clinical decisions informed by n-of-1 trials improve patient outcomes compared to usual care. Our objective was to provide an overview of the clinical trial evidence on the effect of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of medical databases, trial registries, and gray literature was performed to identify trials assessing clinical outcomes in a group of patients undergoing an n-of-1 trial compared to those receiving usual care for any clinical condition. We abstracted elements related to study design and results and assessed risk of bias for both the overall randomized trials and the n-of-1 trials. The review was registered on PROSPERO. (CRD: 42020166490). FINDINGS: Twelve randomized trials of the n-of-1 approach were identified in conditions spanning chronic pain, osteoarthritis, chronic irreversible airflow limitation, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, statin intolerance, and hypertension. One trial showed a statistically significant benefit in the primary outcome. Only one reached the pre-specified sample size target. Secondary outcomes showed modest benefits, including decreasing medication use, fewer atrial fibrillation episodes, and improved patient satisfaction. INTERPRETATION: Very few trials have been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of n-of-1 trials in improving clinical outcomes, and most trials were underpowered for the primary outcome. Barriers to enrollment and retention in these trials should be explored, as well-powered randomized trials are needed to clarify the clinical impact of n-of-1 trials and assess their utility in clinical practice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9162303 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91623032022-06-03 A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes Samuel, Joyce P. Wootton, Susan H. Holder, Travis Molony, Donald PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The single patient (n-of-1) trial can be used to resolve therapeutic uncertainty for the individual patient. Treatment alternatives are systematically tested against each other, generating patient-specific data used to inform an individualized treatment plan. We hypothesize that clinical decisions informed by n-of-1 trials improve patient outcomes compared to usual care. Our objective was to provide an overview of the clinical trial evidence on the effect of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of medical databases, trial registries, and gray literature was performed to identify trials assessing clinical outcomes in a group of patients undergoing an n-of-1 trial compared to those receiving usual care for any clinical condition. We abstracted elements related to study design and results and assessed risk of bias for both the overall randomized trials and the n-of-1 trials. The review was registered on PROSPERO. (CRD: 42020166490). FINDINGS: Twelve randomized trials of the n-of-1 approach were identified in conditions spanning chronic pain, osteoarthritis, chronic irreversible airflow limitation, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, hyperlipidemia, atrial fibrillation, statin intolerance, and hypertension. One trial showed a statistically significant benefit in the primary outcome. Only one reached the pre-specified sample size target. Secondary outcomes showed modest benefits, including decreasing medication use, fewer atrial fibrillation episodes, and improved patient satisfaction. INTERPRETATION: Very few trials have been undertaken to assess the effectiveness of n-of-1 trials in improving clinical outcomes, and most trials were underpowered for the primary outcome. Barriers to enrollment and retention in these trials should be explored, as well-powered randomized trials are needed to clarify the clinical impact of n-of-1 trials and assess their utility in clinical practice. Public Library of Science 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9162303/ /pubmed/35653405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269387 Text en © 2022 Samuel et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Samuel, Joyce P. Wootton, Susan H. Holder, Travis Molony, Donald A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes |
title | A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes |
title_full | A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes |
title_fullStr | A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes |
title_short | A scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes |
title_sort | scoping review of randomized trials assessing the impact of n-of-1 trials on clinical outcomes |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162303/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653405 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269387 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT samueljoycep ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes AT woottonsusanh ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes AT holdertravis ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes AT molonydonald ascopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes AT samueljoycep scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes AT woottonsusanh scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes AT holdertravis scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes AT molonydonald scopingreviewofrandomizedtrialsassessingtheimpactofnof1trialsonclinicaloutcomes |