Cargando…

Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of stable supportive to flat flexible walking shoes on medial tibiofemoral contact force (MTCF) in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. DESIGN: This was a randomized cross-over study. Twenty-eight participants aged ≥50 years with medial knee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Starkey, Scott, Hinman, Rana, Paterson, Kade, Saxby, David, Knox, Gabrielle, Hall, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269331
_version_ 1784719673861865472
author Starkey, Scott
Hinman, Rana
Paterson, Kade
Saxby, David
Knox, Gabrielle
Hall, Michelle
author_facet Starkey, Scott
Hinman, Rana
Paterson, Kade
Saxby, David
Knox, Gabrielle
Hall, Michelle
author_sort Starkey, Scott
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of stable supportive to flat flexible walking shoes on medial tibiofemoral contact force (MTCF) in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. DESIGN: This was a randomized cross-over study. Twenty-eight participants aged ≥50 years with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment were recruited from the community. Three-dimensional full-body motion, ground reaction forces and surface electromyograms from twelve lower-limb muscles were acquired during six speed-matched walking trials for flat flexible and stable supportive shoes, tested in random order. An electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model with subject-specific geometry estimated bodyweight (BW) normalized MTCF. Waveforms were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping with a repeated measures analysis of variance model. Peak MTCF, MTCF impulse and MTCF loading rates (discrete outcomes) were evaluated using a repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance model. RESULTS: Statistical parametric mapping showed lower MTCF in stable supportive compared to flat flexible shoes during 5–18% of stance phase (p = 0.001). For the discrete outcomes, peak MTCF and MTCF impulse were not different between the shoe styles. However, mean differences [95%CI] in loading impulse (-0.02 BW·s [-0.02, 0.01], p<0.001), mean loading rate (-1.42 BW·s(-1) [-2.39, -0.45], p = 0.01) and max loading rate (-3.26 BW·s(-1) [-5.94, -0.59], p = 0.02) indicated lower measure of loading in stable supportive shoes compared to flexible shoes. CONCLUSIONS: Stable supportive shoes reduced MTCF during loading stance and reduced loading impulse/rates compared to flat flexible shoes and therefore may be more suitable in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (12619000622101).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9162314
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91623142022-06-03 Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study Starkey, Scott Hinman, Rana Paterson, Kade Saxby, David Knox, Gabrielle Hall, Michelle PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect of stable supportive to flat flexible walking shoes on medial tibiofemoral contact force (MTCF) in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. DESIGN: This was a randomized cross-over study. Twenty-eight participants aged ≥50 years with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment were recruited from the community. Three-dimensional full-body motion, ground reaction forces and surface electromyograms from twelve lower-limb muscles were acquired during six speed-matched walking trials for flat flexible and stable supportive shoes, tested in random order. An electromyogram-informed neuromusculoskeletal model with subject-specific geometry estimated bodyweight (BW) normalized MTCF. Waveforms were analyzed using statistical parametric mapping with a repeated measures analysis of variance model. Peak MTCF, MTCF impulse and MTCF loading rates (discrete outcomes) were evaluated using a repeated measures multivariate analysis of variance model. RESULTS: Statistical parametric mapping showed lower MTCF in stable supportive compared to flat flexible shoes during 5–18% of stance phase (p = 0.001). For the discrete outcomes, peak MTCF and MTCF impulse were not different between the shoe styles. However, mean differences [95%CI] in loading impulse (-0.02 BW·s [-0.02, 0.01], p<0.001), mean loading rate (-1.42 BW·s(-1) [-2.39, -0.45], p = 0.01) and max loading rate (-3.26 BW·s(-1) [-5.94, -0.59], p = 0.02) indicated lower measure of loading in stable supportive shoes compared to flexible shoes. CONCLUSIONS: Stable supportive shoes reduced MTCF during loading stance and reduced loading impulse/rates compared to flat flexible shoes and therefore may be more suitable in people with medial knee osteoarthritis and varus malalignment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (12619000622101). Public Library of Science 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9162314/ /pubmed/35653355 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269331 Text en © 2022 Starkey et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Starkey, Scott
Hinman, Rana
Paterson, Kade
Saxby, David
Knox, Gabrielle
Hall, Michelle
Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study
title Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study
title_full Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study
title_fullStr Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study
title_full_unstemmed Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study
title_short Tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: A randomized cross-over study
title_sort tibiofemoral contact force differences between flat flexible and stable supportive walking shoes in people with varus-malaligned medial knee osteoarthritis: a randomized cross-over study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9162314/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35653355
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269331
work_keys_str_mv AT starkeyscott tibiofemoralcontactforcedifferencesbetweenflatflexibleandstablesupportivewalkingshoesinpeoplewithvarusmalalignedmedialkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT hinmanrana tibiofemoralcontactforcedifferencesbetweenflatflexibleandstablesupportivewalkingshoesinpeoplewithvarusmalalignedmedialkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT patersonkade tibiofemoralcontactforcedifferencesbetweenflatflexibleandstablesupportivewalkingshoesinpeoplewithvarusmalalignedmedialkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT saxbydavid tibiofemoralcontactforcedifferencesbetweenflatflexibleandstablesupportivewalkingshoesinpeoplewithvarusmalalignedmedialkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT knoxgabrielle tibiofemoralcontactforcedifferencesbetweenflatflexibleandstablesupportivewalkingshoesinpeoplewithvarusmalalignedmedialkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcrossoverstudy
AT hallmichelle tibiofemoralcontactforcedifferencesbetweenflatflexibleandstablesupportivewalkingshoesinpeoplewithvarusmalalignedmedialkneeosteoarthritisarandomizedcrossoverstudy