Cargando…
Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy
BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence (RWE) plays an increasingly important role within global regulatory and reimbursement processes. RWE generation can be enhanced by the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which can provide valuable information on the effectiveness, safety, and tole...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00466-7 |
_version_ | 1784719883298144256 |
---|---|
author | Maruszczyk, Konrad Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Torlinska, Barbara Collis, Philip Keeley, Thomas Calvert, Melanie J. |
author_facet | Maruszczyk, Konrad Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Torlinska, Barbara Collis, Philip Keeley, Thomas Calvert, Melanie J. |
author_sort | Maruszczyk, Konrad |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence (RWE) plays an increasingly important role within global regulatory and reimbursement processes. RWE generation can be enhanced by the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which can provide valuable information on the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of health interventions from the patient perspective. This systematic review aims to examine and summarise the available PRO-specific recommendations and guidance for RWE generation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, and websites of selected organisations were systematically searched to identify relevant publications. 1,249 articles were screened of which 7 papers met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The included publications provided PRO-specific recommendations to facilitate the use of PROs for RWE generation and these were extracted and grouped into eight major categories. These included: (1) instrument selection, (2) participation and engagement, (3) burden to health care professionals and patients, (4) stakeholder collaboration, (5) education and training, (6) PRO implementation process, (7) data collection and management, and (8) data analysis and presentation of results. The main limitation of the study was the potential exclusion of relevant publications, due to poor indexing of the databases and websites searched. CONCLUSIONS: PROs may provide valuable and crucial patient input in RWE generation. Whilst valuable insights can be gained from guidance for use of PROs in clinical care, there is a lack of international guidance specific to RWE generation in the context of use for regulatory decision-making, reimbursement, and health policy. Clear and appropriate evidence-based guidance is required to maximise the potential benefits of implementing PROs for RWE generation. Unique aspects between PRO guidance for clinical care and other purposes should be differentiated. The needs of various stakeholder groups (including patients, health care professionals, regulators, payers, and industry) should be considered when developing future guidelines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00466-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9163278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91632782022-06-05 Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy Maruszczyk, Konrad Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Torlinska, Barbara Collis, Philip Keeley, Thomas Calvert, Melanie J. J Patient Rep Outcomes Review BACKGROUND: Real-world evidence (RWE) plays an increasingly important role within global regulatory and reimbursement processes. RWE generation can be enhanced by the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs), which can provide valuable information on the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of health interventions from the patient perspective. This systematic review aims to examine and summarise the available PRO-specific recommendations and guidance for RWE generation. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online, Excerpta Medica Database, and websites of selected organisations were systematically searched to identify relevant publications. 1,249 articles were screened of which 7 papers met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The included publications provided PRO-specific recommendations to facilitate the use of PROs for RWE generation and these were extracted and grouped into eight major categories. These included: (1) instrument selection, (2) participation and engagement, (3) burden to health care professionals and patients, (4) stakeholder collaboration, (5) education and training, (6) PRO implementation process, (7) data collection and management, and (8) data analysis and presentation of results. The main limitation of the study was the potential exclusion of relevant publications, due to poor indexing of the databases and websites searched. CONCLUSIONS: PROs may provide valuable and crucial patient input in RWE generation. Whilst valuable insights can be gained from guidance for use of PROs in clinical care, there is a lack of international guidance specific to RWE generation in the context of use for regulatory decision-making, reimbursement, and health policy. Clear and appropriate evidence-based guidance is required to maximise the potential benefits of implementing PROs for RWE generation. Unique aspects between PRO guidance for clinical care and other purposes should be differentiated. The needs of various stakeholder groups (including patients, health care professionals, regulators, payers, and industry) should be considered when developing future guidelines. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s41687-022-00466-7. Springer International Publishing 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9163278/ /pubmed/35652983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00466-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Maruszczyk, Konrad Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee Torlinska, Barbara Collis, Philip Keeley, Thomas Calvert, Melanie J. Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy |
title | Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy |
title_full | Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy |
title_short | Systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy |
title_sort | systematic review of guidance for the collection and use of patient-reported outcomes in real-world evidence generation to support regulation, reimbursement and health policy |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35652983 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s41687-022-00466-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maruszczykkonrad systematicreviewofguidanceforthecollectionanduseofpatientreportedoutcomesinrealworldevidencegenerationtosupportregulationreimbursementandhealthpolicy AT aiyegbusiolalekanlee systematicreviewofguidanceforthecollectionanduseofpatientreportedoutcomesinrealworldevidencegenerationtosupportregulationreimbursementandhealthpolicy AT torlinskabarbara systematicreviewofguidanceforthecollectionanduseofpatientreportedoutcomesinrealworldevidencegenerationtosupportregulationreimbursementandhealthpolicy AT collisphilip systematicreviewofguidanceforthecollectionanduseofpatientreportedoutcomesinrealworldevidencegenerationtosupportregulationreimbursementandhealthpolicy AT keeleythomas systematicreviewofguidanceforthecollectionanduseofpatientreportedoutcomesinrealworldevidencegenerationtosupportregulationreimbursementandhealthpolicy AT calvertmelaniej systematicreviewofguidanceforthecollectionanduseofpatientreportedoutcomesinrealworldevidencegenerationtosupportregulationreimbursementandhealthpolicy |