Cargando…
Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
INTRODUCTION: To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological e...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.551 |
_version_ | 1784719923713409024 |
---|---|
author | Iizumi, Takashi Ishikawa, Hitoshi Sekino, Yuta Tanaka, Keiichi Takizawa, Daichi Makishima, Hirokazu Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Nakai, Kei Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_facet | Iizumi, Takashi Ishikawa, Hitoshi Sekino, Yuta Tanaka, Keiichi Takizawa, Daichi Makishima, Hirokazu Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Nakai, Kei Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Hideyuki |
author_sort | Iizumi, Takashi |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. METHODS: We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9163454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91634542022-06-04 Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer Iizumi, Takashi Ishikawa, Hitoshi Sekino, Yuta Tanaka, Keiichi Takizawa, Daichi Makishima, Hirokazu Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Nakai, Kei Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Hideyuki J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. METHODS: We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-19 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9163454/ /pubmed/34664410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.551 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Iizumi, Takashi Ishikawa, Hitoshi Sekino, Yuta Tanaka, Keiichi Takizawa, Daichi Makishima, Hirokazu Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Nakai, Kei Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Hideyuki Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer |
title | Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer |
title_full | Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer |
title_fullStr | Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer |
title_short | Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer |
title_sort | acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iizumitakashi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT ishikawahitoshi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT sekinoyuta acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT tanakakeiichi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT takizawadaichi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT makishimahirokazu acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT numajiriharuko acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT mizumotomasashi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT nakaikei acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT okumuratoshiyuki acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer AT sakuraihideyuki acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer |