Cargando…

Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION: To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological e...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iizumi, Takashi, Ishikawa, Hitoshi, Sekino, Yuta, Tanaka, Keiichi, Takizawa, Daichi, Makishima, Hirokazu, Numajiri, Haruko, Mizumoto, Masashi, Nakai, Kei, Okumura, Toshiyuki, Sakurai, Hideyuki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.551
_version_ 1784719923713409024
author Iizumi, Takashi
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Sekino, Yuta
Tanaka, Keiichi
Takizawa, Daichi
Makishima, Hirokazu
Numajiri, Haruko
Mizumoto, Masashi
Nakai, Kei
Okumura, Toshiyuki
Sakurai, Hideyuki
author_facet Iizumi, Takashi
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Sekino, Yuta
Tanaka, Keiichi
Takizawa, Daichi
Makishima, Hirokazu
Numajiri, Haruko
Mizumoto, Masashi
Nakai, Kei
Okumura, Toshiyuki
Sakurai, Hideyuki
author_sort Iizumi, Takashi
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. METHODS: We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9163454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91634542022-06-04 Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer Iizumi, Takashi Ishikawa, Hitoshi Sekino, Yuta Tanaka, Keiichi Takizawa, Daichi Makishima, Hirokazu Numajiri, Haruko Mizumoto, Masashi Nakai, Kei Okumura, Toshiyuki Sakurai, Hideyuki J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: To confirm the feasibility of hypofractionated proton beam therapy (PBT), we compared the acute adverse event rates and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) in prostate cancer patients treated with hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated (2.0 Gy relative biological effectiveness (RBE)/fraction) PBT. METHODS: We reviewed 289 patients with prostate cancer, of whom 73, 100, and 116 patients were treated with 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 Gy (RBE)/fraction, respectively. The endpoints were acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicities and the IPSS, evaluated up to 6 months after PBT initiation. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in acute toxicity rates or the IPSS among the fractionation schedules. Diabetes mellitus, age, and androgen deprivation therapy were not identified as factors associated with the IPSS. CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in adverse events or quality of life among the three fractionation schedules early after PBT. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-10-19 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9163454/ /pubmed/34664410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.551 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Iizumi, Takashi
Ishikawa, Hitoshi
Sekino, Yuta
Tanaka, Keiichi
Takizawa, Daichi
Makishima, Hirokazu
Numajiri, Haruko
Mizumoto, Masashi
Nakai, Kei
Okumura, Toshiyuki
Sakurai, Hideyuki
Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
title Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
title_full Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
title_fullStr Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
title_full_unstemmed Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
title_short Acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
title_sort acute toxicity and patient‐reported symptom score after conventional versus moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34664410
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.551
work_keys_str_mv AT iizumitakashi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT ishikawahitoshi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT sekinoyuta acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT tanakakeiichi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT takizawadaichi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT makishimahirokazu acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT numajiriharuko acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT mizumotomasashi acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT nakaikei acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT okumuratoshiyuki acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer
AT sakuraihideyuki acutetoxicityandpatientreportedsymptomscoreafterconventionalversusmoderatelyhypofractionatedprotontherapyforprostatecancer