Cargando…

Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments

INTRODUCTION: Radiation oncology patient pathways are complex. This complexity creates risk and potential for error to occur. Comprehensive safety and quality management programmes have been developed alongside the use of incident learning systems (ILSs) to mitigate risks and errors reaching patient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Adamson, Laura, Beldham‐Collins, Rachael, Sykes, Jonathan, Thwaites, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.563
_version_ 1784719930241843200
author Adamson, Laura
Beldham‐Collins, Rachael
Sykes, Jonathan
Thwaites, David
author_facet Adamson, Laura
Beldham‐Collins, Rachael
Sykes, Jonathan
Thwaites, David
author_sort Adamson, Laura
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Radiation oncology patient pathways are complex. This complexity creates risk and potential for error to occur. Comprehensive safety and quality management programmes have been developed alongside the use of incident learning systems (ILSs) to mitigate risks and errors reaching patients. Robust ILSs rely on the safety culture (SC) within a department. The aim of this study was to assess perceptions and understanding of SC and ILSs in two closely linked radiation oncology departments and to use the results to consider possible quality improvement (QI) of department ILSs and SC. METHODS: A survey to assess perceptions of SC and the currently used ILSs was distributed to radiation oncologists, radiation therapists and radiation oncology medical physicists in the two departments. The responses of 95 staff were evaluated (63% of staff). The findings were used to determine any areas for improvement in SC and local ILSs. RESULTS: Differences were shown between the professional cohorts. Barriers to current ILS use were indicated by 67% of respondents. Positive SC was shown in each area assessed: 69% indicated the departments practised a no‐blame culture. Barriers identified in one department prompted a QI project to develop a new reporting system and process, improve departmental learning and modify the overall ILS. CONCLUSION: An understanding of SC and attitudes to ILSs has been established and used to improve ILS reporting, feedback on incidents, departmental learning and the QA program. This can be used for future comparisons as the systems develop.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9163481
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91634812022-06-04 Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments Adamson, Laura Beldham‐Collins, Rachael Sykes, Jonathan Thwaites, David J Med Radiat Sci Original Articles INTRODUCTION: Radiation oncology patient pathways are complex. This complexity creates risk and potential for error to occur. Comprehensive safety and quality management programmes have been developed alongside the use of incident learning systems (ILSs) to mitigate risks and errors reaching patients. Robust ILSs rely on the safety culture (SC) within a department. The aim of this study was to assess perceptions and understanding of SC and ILSs in two closely linked radiation oncology departments and to use the results to consider possible quality improvement (QI) of department ILSs and SC. METHODS: A survey to assess perceptions of SC and the currently used ILSs was distributed to radiation oncologists, radiation therapists and radiation oncology medical physicists in the two departments. The responses of 95 staff were evaluated (63% of staff). The findings were used to determine any areas for improvement in SC and local ILSs. RESULTS: Differences were shown between the professional cohorts. Barriers to current ILS use were indicated by 67% of respondents. Positive SC was shown in each area assessed: 69% indicated the departments practised a no‐blame culture. Barriers identified in one department prompted a QI project to develop a new reporting system and process, improve departmental learning and modify the overall ILS. CONCLUSION: An understanding of SC and attitudes to ILSs has been established and used to improve ILS reporting, feedback on incidents, departmental learning and the QA program. This can be used for future comparisons as the systems develop. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2021-12-09 2022-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9163481/ /pubmed/34882982 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.563 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Society of Medical Imaging and Radiation Therapy and New Zealand Institute of Medical Radiation Technology https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Adamson, Laura
Beldham‐Collins, Rachael
Sykes, Jonathan
Thwaites, David
Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments
title Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments
title_full Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments
title_fullStr Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments
title_short Evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments
title_sort evaluating incident learning systems and safety culture in two radiation oncology departments
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163481/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882982
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmrs.563
work_keys_str_mv AT adamsonlaura evaluatingincidentlearningsystemsandsafetycultureintworadiationoncologydepartments
AT beldhamcollinsrachael evaluatingincidentlearningsystemsandsafetycultureintworadiationoncologydepartments
AT sykesjonathan evaluatingincidentlearningsystemsandsafetycultureintworadiationoncologydepartments
AT thwaitesdavid evaluatingincidentlearningsystemsandsafetycultureintworadiationoncologydepartments