Cargando…
Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence
Academic industry partnership (AIP) represents an important alliance between academic researchers and industry that helps translate technology and complete the innovation cycle within academic health systems. Despite diverging missions and skillsets the culture for academia and industry is changing...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100026 |
_version_ | 1784719969209024512 |
---|---|
author | Pantanowitz, Liron Bui, Marilyn M. Chauhan, Chhavi ElGabry, Ehab Hassell, Lewis Li, Zaibo Parwani, Anil V. Salama, Mohamed E. Sebastian, Manu M. Tulman, David Vepa, Suryanarayana Becich, Michael J. |
author_facet | Pantanowitz, Liron Bui, Marilyn M. Chauhan, Chhavi ElGabry, Ehab Hassell, Lewis Li, Zaibo Parwani, Anil V. Salama, Mohamed E. Sebastian, Manu M. Tulman, David Vepa, Suryanarayana Becich, Michael J. |
author_sort | Pantanowitz, Liron |
collection | PubMed |
description | Academic industry partnership (AIP) represents an important alliance between academic researchers and industry that helps translate technology and complete the innovation cycle within academic health systems. Despite diverging missions and skillsets the culture for academia and industry is changing in response to the current digital era which is spawning greater collaboration between physicians and businesses in this marketplace. In the field of pathology, this is further driven by the fact that traditional funding sources cannot keep pace with the innovation needed in digital pathology and artificial intelligence. This concept article from the Digital Pathology Association (DPA) describes the rules of engagement for pathology innovators in academia and for their corporate partners to help establish best practices in this critical area. Stakeholders include pathologists, basic and translational researchers, university technology transfer and sponsored research offices, as well as industry relations officers. The article discusses the benefits and pitfalls of an AIP, reviews different partnership models, examines the role of pathologists in the innovation cycle, explains various agreements that may need to be signed, covers conflict of interest and intellectual property issues, and offers recommendations for ensuring successful partnerships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9163695 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91636952022-06-05 Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence Pantanowitz, Liron Bui, Marilyn M. Chauhan, Chhavi ElGabry, Ehab Hassell, Lewis Li, Zaibo Parwani, Anil V. Salama, Mohamed E. Sebastian, Manu M. Tulman, David Vepa, Suryanarayana Becich, Michael J. Acad Pathol Review Article Academic industry partnership (AIP) represents an important alliance between academic researchers and industry that helps translate technology and complete the innovation cycle within academic health systems. Despite diverging missions and skillsets the culture for academia and industry is changing in response to the current digital era which is spawning greater collaboration between physicians and businesses in this marketplace. In the field of pathology, this is further driven by the fact that traditional funding sources cannot keep pace with the innovation needed in digital pathology and artificial intelligence. This concept article from the Digital Pathology Association (DPA) describes the rules of engagement for pathology innovators in academia and for their corporate partners to help establish best practices in this critical area. Stakeholders include pathologists, basic and translational researchers, university technology transfer and sponsored research offices, as well as industry relations officers. The article discusses the benefits and pitfalls of an AIP, reviews different partnership models, examines the role of pathologists in the innovation cycle, explains various agreements that may need to be signed, covers conflict of interest and intellectual property issues, and offers recommendations for ensuring successful partnerships. Elsevier 2022-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9163695/ /pubmed/35669406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100026 Text en © 2022 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of Association of Pathology Chairs. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Pantanowitz, Liron Bui, Marilyn M. Chauhan, Chhavi ElGabry, Ehab Hassell, Lewis Li, Zaibo Parwani, Anil V. Salama, Mohamed E. Sebastian, Manu M. Tulman, David Vepa, Suryanarayana Becich, Michael J. Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence |
title | Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence |
title_full | Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence |
title_fullStr | Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence |
title_full_unstemmed | Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence |
title_short | Rules of engagement: Promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence |
title_sort | rules of engagement: promoting academic-industry partnership in the era of digital pathology and artificial intelligence |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163695/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35669406 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acpath.2022.100026 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pantanowitzliron rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT buimarilynm rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT chauhanchhavi rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT elgabryehab rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT hasselllewis rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT lizaibo rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT parwanianilv rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT salamamohamede rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT sebastianmanum rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT tulmandavid rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT vepasuryanarayana rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence AT becichmichaelj rulesofengagementpromotingacademicindustrypartnershipintheeraofdigitalpathologyandartificialintelligence |