Cargando…
Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an enhanced online injury prevention programme on the number of running-related injuries (RRIs) in recreational runners. METHODS: We conducted a randomised-controlled trial in runners who registered for running events (distances:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104539 |
_version_ | 1784719973913985024 |
---|---|
author | Cloosterman, Kyra L A Fokkema, Tryntsje de Vos, Robert-Jan Visser, Edwin Krastman, Patrick IJzerman, John Koes, Bart W Verhaar, Jan A N Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A van Middelkoop, Marienke |
author_facet | Cloosterman, Kyra L A Fokkema, Tryntsje de Vos, Robert-Jan Visser, Edwin Krastman, Patrick IJzerman, John Koes, Bart W Verhaar, Jan A N Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A van Middelkoop, Marienke |
author_sort | Cloosterman, Kyra L A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an enhanced online injury prevention programme on the number of running-related injuries (RRIs) in recreational runners. METHODS: We conducted a randomised-controlled trial in runners who registered for running events (distances: 10–42.195 km) in the Netherlands. Adult runners who provided informed consent were randomised into the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group received access to the online prevention programme, which included items to prevent RRIs. Participants in the control group followed their regular preparation for the running event. The primary outcome measure was the number of new RRIs from baseline to 1 month after the running event. To determine differences between injury proportions, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: This study included 4050 recreational runners (63.5% males; mean (SD) age: 42.3 (12.1) years) for analyses. During follow-up, 35.5% (95% CI: 33.5 to 37.6) of the participants in the intervention group sustained a new RRI compared with 35.4% (95% CI: 33.3 to 37.5) of the participants in the control group, with no between-group difference (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.17). There was a positive association between the number of items followed in the injury prevention programme and the number of RRIs (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.11). CONCLUSION: The enhanced online injury prevention programme had no effect on the number of RRIs in recreational runners, and being compliant with the programme paradoxically was associated with a slightly higher injury rate. Future studies should focus on individual targeted prevention with emphasis on the timing and application of preventive measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7694. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9163714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91637142022-06-16 Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial Cloosterman, Kyra L A Fokkema, Tryntsje de Vos, Robert-Jan Visser, Edwin Krastman, Patrick IJzerman, John Koes, Bart W Verhaar, Jan A N Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A van Middelkoop, Marienke Br J Sports Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an enhanced online injury prevention programme on the number of running-related injuries (RRIs) in recreational runners. METHODS: We conducted a randomised-controlled trial in runners who registered for running events (distances: 10–42.195 km) in the Netherlands. Adult runners who provided informed consent were randomised into the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group received access to the online prevention programme, which included items to prevent RRIs. Participants in the control group followed their regular preparation for the running event. The primary outcome measure was the number of new RRIs from baseline to 1 month after the running event. To determine differences between injury proportions, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: This study included 4050 recreational runners (63.5% males; mean (SD) age: 42.3 (12.1) years) for analyses. During follow-up, 35.5% (95% CI: 33.5 to 37.6) of the participants in the intervention group sustained a new RRI compared with 35.4% (95% CI: 33.3 to 37.5) of the participants in the control group, with no between-group difference (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.17). There was a positive association between the number of items followed in the injury prevention programme and the number of RRIs (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.11). CONCLUSION: The enhanced online injury prevention programme had no effect on the number of RRIs in recreational runners, and being compliant with the programme paradoxically was associated with a slightly higher injury rate. Future studies should focus on individual targeted prevention with emphasis on the timing and application of preventive measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7694. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9163714/ /pubmed/35197248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104539 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Cloosterman, Kyra L A Fokkema, Tryntsje de Vos, Robert-Jan Visser, Edwin Krastman, Patrick IJzerman, John Koes, Bart W Verhaar, Jan A N Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A van Middelkoop, Marienke Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial |
title | Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial |
title_full | Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial |
title_short | Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial |
title_sort | educational online prevention programme (the sprint study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104539 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cloostermankyrala educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT fokkematryntsje educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT devosrobertjan educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT visseredwin educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT krastmanpatrick educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ijzermanjohn educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT koesbartw educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT verhaarjanan educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT biermazeinstrasitama educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT vanmiddelkoopmarienke educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial |