Cargando…

Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an enhanced online injury prevention programme on the number of running-related injuries (RRIs) in recreational runners. METHODS: We conducted a randomised-controlled trial in runners who registered for running events (distances:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cloosterman, Kyra L A, Fokkema, Tryntsje, de Vos, Robert-Jan, Visser, Edwin, Krastman, Patrick, IJzerman, John, Koes, Bart W, Verhaar, Jan A N, Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A, van Middelkoop, Marienke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104539
_version_ 1784719973913985024
author Cloosterman, Kyra L A
Fokkema, Tryntsje
de Vos, Robert-Jan
Visser, Edwin
Krastman, Patrick
IJzerman, John
Koes, Bart W
Verhaar, Jan A N
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
van Middelkoop, Marienke
author_facet Cloosterman, Kyra L A
Fokkema, Tryntsje
de Vos, Robert-Jan
Visser, Edwin
Krastman, Patrick
IJzerman, John
Koes, Bart W
Verhaar, Jan A N
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
van Middelkoop, Marienke
author_sort Cloosterman, Kyra L A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an enhanced online injury prevention programme on the number of running-related injuries (RRIs) in recreational runners. METHODS: We conducted a randomised-controlled trial in runners who registered for running events (distances: 10–42.195 km) in the Netherlands. Adult runners who provided informed consent were randomised into the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group received access to the online prevention programme, which included items to prevent RRIs. Participants in the control group followed their regular preparation for the running event. The primary outcome measure was the number of new RRIs from baseline to 1 month after the running event. To determine differences between injury proportions, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: This study included 4050 recreational runners (63.5% males; mean (SD) age: 42.3 (12.1) years) for analyses. During follow-up, 35.5% (95% CI: 33.5 to 37.6) of the participants in the intervention group sustained a new RRI compared with 35.4% (95% CI: 33.3 to 37.5) of the participants in the control group, with no between-group difference (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.17). There was a positive association between the number of items followed in the injury prevention programme and the number of RRIs (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.11). CONCLUSION: The enhanced online injury prevention programme had no effect on the number of RRIs in recreational runners, and being compliant with the programme paradoxically was associated with a slightly higher injury rate. Future studies should focus on individual targeted prevention with emphasis on the timing and application of preventive measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7694.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9163714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91637142022-06-16 Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial Cloosterman, Kyra L A Fokkema, Tryntsje de Vos, Robert-Jan Visser, Edwin Krastman, Patrick IJzerman, John Koes, Bart W Verhaar, Jan A N Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A van Middelkoop, Marienke Br J Sports Med Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of an enhanced online injury prevention programme on the number of running-related injuries (RRIs) in recreational runners. METHODS: We conducted a randomised-controlled trial in runners who registered for running events (distances: 10–42.195 km) in the Netherlands. Adult runners who provided informed consent were randomised into the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group received access to the online prevention programme, which included items to prevent RRIs. Participants in the control group followed their regular preparation for the running event. The primary outcome measure was the number of new RRIs from baseline to 1 month after the running event. To determine differences between injury proportions, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: This study included 4050 recreational runners (63.5% males; mean (SD) age: 42.3 (12.1) years) for analyses. During follow-up, 35.5% (95% CI: 33.5 to 37.6) of the participants in the intervention group sustained a new RRI compared with 35.4% (95% CI: 33.3 to 37.5) of the participants in the control group, with no between-group difference (OR: 1.03; 95% CI: 0.90 to 1.17). There was a positive association between the number of items followed in the injury prevention programme and the number of RRIs (OR: 1.05; 95% CI: 1.00 to 1.11). CONCLUSION: The enhanced online injury prevention programme had no effect on the number of RRIs in recreational runners, and being compliant with the programme paradoxically was associated with a slightly higher injury rate. Future studies should focus on individual targeted prevention with emphasis on the timing and application of preventive measures. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NL7694. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06 2022-02-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9163714/ /pubmed/35197248 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104539 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Cloosterman, Kyra L A
Fokkema, Tryntsje
de Vos, Robert-Jan
Visser, Edwin
Krastman, Patrick
IJzerman, John
Koes, Bart W
Verhaar, Jan A N
Bierma-Zeinstra, Sita M A
van Middelkoop, Marienke
Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
title Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
title_full Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
title_fullStr Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
title_short Educational online prevention programme (the SPRINT study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
title_sort educational online prevention programme (the sprint study) has no effect on the number of running-related injuries in recreational runners: a randomised-controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9163714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35197248
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2021-104539
work_keys_str_mv AT cloostermankyrala educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT fokkematryntsje educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT devosrobertjan educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT visseredwin educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT krastmanpatrick educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ijzermanjohn educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT koesbartw educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT verhaarjanan educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT biermazeinstrasitama educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT vanmiddelkoopmarienke educationalonlinepreventionprogrammethesprintstudyhasnoeffectonthenumberofrunningrelatedinjuriesinrecreationalrunnersarandomisedcontrolledtrial