Cargando…

ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups

SIMPLE SUMMARY: ERβ, an ER subtype first identified in 1996, is significantly expressed in ERα-negative breast cancer (BCa) and TNBC. Many studies investigated mostly ERβ1 protein expression in the entire cohort of BCa, and the results are inconsistent. In this study, we simultaneously investigated...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Choi, Young, Kim, Hadong, Pollack, Simcha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35723365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb44040107
_version_ 1784720060769632256
author Choi, Young
Kim, Hadong
Pollack, Simcha
author_facet Choi, Young
Kim, Hadong
Pollack, Simcha
author_sort Choi, Young
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: ERβ, an ER subtype first identified in 1996, is significantly expressed in ERα-negative breast cancer (BCa) and TNBC. Many studies investigated mostly ERβ1 protein expression in the entire cohort of BCa, and the results are inconsistent. In this study, we simultaneously investigated both ERβ mRNA and three ERβ 1, 2, and 5 protein isoforms in various subtypes and subgroups of BCa. Each ERβ isoform’s mRNA and protein expression seemingly plays a significant role in BCa subtypes and subgroups, and ERβ2 mRNA expression is risk factor for poor outcome. Studies in a large cohort of BCa are needed to explore the potential usefulness of ERβ as a prognostic and predictive marker and a therapeutic target in BCa. Furthermore, the standardization of a ERβ testing protocol may be required for ERβ testing to be utilized in a clinical setting. ABSTRACT: ERβ, an ER subtype first identified in 1996, is highly expressed in different types of BCa including ERα-negative BCa and TNBC. Many studies on ERβ expression investigated mostly on ERβ1 protein expression in ERα-positive and ERα-negative BCa combined. The results are conflicting. This may be due to the complexity of ERβ isoforms, subject heterogeneity, and various study designs targeting different ERβ isoforms and either ERβ protein or mRNA expression, as well as to the lack of a standardized testing protocol. Herein, we simultaneously investigated both mRNA and protein expression of ERβ isoforms 1, 2, and 5 in different BCa subtypes and clinical characteristics. Patient samples (138) and breast cancer cell lines (BCC) reflecting different types of BCa were tested for ERα and ERβ mRNA expression using quantitative real-time PCR, as well as for protein expression of ERα, ERβ1, ERβ2, and ERβ5 isoforms, PR, HER2/neu, Ki-67, CK 5/6, and p53 using immunohistochemistry. Associations of ERβ isoform expression with clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. ERβ1, 2, and 5 isoforms are differentially expressed in different BCa subtypes including ERα-negative and TNBC. Each ERβ isoform seemingly plays a distinct role and is associated with clinical tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. ERβ isoform expression is significantly associated with >15% Ki-67 positivity and poor prognostic markers, and it predicts poorer OS, mostly in the subgroups. High ERβ2 and 5 isoform expression in ERα-negative BCa and TNBC is predictive of poor OS. Further investigation of ERβ isoforms in a larger cohort of BCa subgroups is needed to evaluate the role of ERβ for the potential usefulness of ERβ as a prognostic and predictive marker and for therapeutic use. The inconsistent outcomes of ERβ isoform mRNA or protein expression in many studies suggest that the standardization of ERβ testing would facilitate the use of ERβ in a clinical setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9164084
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91640842022-06-04 ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups Choi, Young Kim, Hadong Pollack, Simcha Curr Issues Mol Biol Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: ERβ, an ER subtype first identified in 1996, is significantly expressed in ERα-negative breast cancer (BCa) and TNBC. Many studies investigated mostly ERβ1 protein expression in the entire cohort of BCa, and the results are inconsistent. In this study, we simultaneously investigated both ERβ mRNA and three ERβ 1, 2, and 5 protein isoforms in various subtypes and subgroups of BCa. Each ERβ isoform’s mRNA and protein expression seemingly plays a significant role in BCa subtypes and subgroups, and ERβ2 mRNA expression is risk factor for poor outcome. Studies in a large cohort of BCa are needed to explore the potential usefulness of ERβ as a prognostic and predictive marker and a therapeutic target in BCa. Furthermore, the standardization of a ERβ testing protocol may be required for ERβ testing to be utilized in a clinical setting. ABSTRACT: ERβ, an ER subtype first identified in 1996, is highly expressed in different types of BCa including ERα-negative BCa and TNBC. Many studies on ERβ expression investigated mostly on ERβ1 protein expression in ERα-positive and ERα-negative BCa combined. The results are conflicting. This may be due to the complexity of ERβ isoforms, subject heterogeneity, and various study designs targeting different ERβ isoforms and either ERβ protein or mRNA expression, as well as to the lack of a standardized testing protocol. Herein, we simultaneously investigated both mRNA and protein expression of ERβ isoforms 1, 2, and 5 in different BCa subtypes and clinical characteristics. Patient samples (138) and breast cancer cell lines (BCC) reflecting different types of BCa were tested for ERα and ERβ mRNA expression using quantitative real-time PCR, as well as for protein expression of ERα, ERβ1, ERβ2, and ERβ5 isoforms, PR, HER2/neu, Ki-67, CK 5/6, and p53 using immunohistochemistry. Associations of ERβ isoform expression with clinical characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. ERβ1, 2, and 5 isoforms are differentially expressed in different BCa subtypes including ERα-negative and TNBC. Each ERβ isoform seemingly plays a distinct role and is associated with clinical tumor characteristics and patient outcomes. ERβ isoform expression is significantly associated with >15% Ki-67 positivity and poor prognostic markers, and it predicts poorer OS, mostly in the subgroups. High ERβ2 and 5 isoform expression in ERα-negative BCa and TNBC is predictive of poor OS. Further investigation of ERβ isoforms in a larger cohort of BCa subgroups is needed to evaluate the role of ERβ for the potential usefulness of ERβ as a prognostic and predictive marker and for therapeutic use. The inconsistent outcomes of ERβ isoform mRNA or protein expression in many studies suggest that the standardization of ERβ testing would facilitate the use of ERβ in a clinical setting. MDPI 2022-04-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9164084/ /pubmed/35723365 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb44040107 Text en © 2022 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Choi, Young
Kim, Hadong
Pollack, Simcha
ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups
title ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups
title_full ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups
title_fullStr ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups
title_full_unstemmed ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups
title_short ERβ Isoforms Have Differential Clinical Significance in Breast Cancer Subtypes and Subgroups
title_sort erβ isoforms have differential clinical significance in breast cancer subtypes and subgroups
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164084/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35723365
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cimb44040107
work_keys_str_mv AT choiyoung erbisoformshavedifferentialclinicalsignificanceinbreastcancersubtypesandsubgroups
AT kimhadong erbisoformshavedifferentialclinicalsignificanceinbreastcancersubtypesandsubgroups
AT pollacksimcha erbisoformshavedifferentialclinicalsignificanceinbreastcancersubtypesandsubgroups