Cargando…
PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study
BACKGROUND: Trauma may be associated with significant to life-threatening blood loss, which in turn may increase the risk of complications and death, particularly in the absence of adequate treatment. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute b...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06390-x |
_version_ | 1784720109695139840 |
---|---|
author | Palma, Clementina Duran Mamba, Musawenkosi Geldenhuys, Johan Fadahun, Oluwafolajimi Rossaint, Rolf Zacharowski, Kai Brand, Martin Díaz-Cambronero, Óscar Belda, Javier Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dormann, Dirk Dehnhardt, Tamara Hernandez-Gonzalez, Martin Schmier, Sonja de Korte, Dianne Plani, Frank Buhre, Wolfgang |
author_facet | Palma, Clementina Duran Mamba, Musawenkosi Geldenhuys, Johan Fadahun, Oluwafolajimi Rossaint, Rolf Zacharowski, Kai Brand, Martin Díaz-Cambronero, Óscar Belda, Javier Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dormann, Dirk Dehnhardt, Tamara Hernandez-Gonzalez, Martin Schmier, Sonja de Korte, Dianne Plani, Frank Buhre, Wolfgang |
author_sort | Palma, Clementina Duran |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Trauma may be associated with significant to life-threatening blood loss, which in turn may increase the risk of complications and death, particularly in the absence of adequate treatment. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss to maintain or re-establish hemodynamic stability with the ultimate goal to avoid organ hypoperfusion and cardiovascular collapse. The current study compares a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) for volume replacement therapy in adult patients with traumatic injuries, as requested by the European Medicines Agency to gain more insights into the safety and efficacy of HES in the setting of trauma care. METHODS: TETHYS is a pragmatic, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter, multinational trial performed in two parallel groups. Eligible consenting adults ≥ 18 years, with an estimated blood loss of ≥ 500 ml, and in whom initial surgery is deemed necessary within 24 h after blunt or penetrating trauma, will be randomized to receive intravenous treatment at an individualized dose with either a 6% HES 130, or an electrolyte solution, for a maximum of 24 h or until reaching the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight, whatever occurs first. Sample size is estimated as 175 patients per group, 350 patients total (α = 0.025 one-tailed, power 1–β = 0.8). Composite primary endpoint evaluated in an exploratory manner will be 90-day mortality and 90-day renal failure, defined as AKIN stage ≥ 2, RIFLE injury/failure stage, or use of renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the first 3 months. Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints are fluid administration and balance, changes in vital signs and hemodynamic status, changes in laboratory parameters including renal function, coagulation, and inflammation biomarkers, incidence of adverse events during treatment period, hospital, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, fitness for ICU or hospital discharge, and duration of mechanical ventilation and/or RRT. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic study will increase the evidence on safety and efficacy of 6% HES 130 for treatment of hypovolemia secondary to acute blood loss in trauma patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in EudraCT, No.: 2016-002176-27 (21 April 2017) and ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03338218 (09 November 2017). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9164328 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91643282022-06-05 PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study Palma, Clementina Duran Mamba, Musawenkosi Geldenhuys, Johan Fadahun, Oluwafolajimi Rossaint, Rolf Zacharowski, Kai Brand, Martin Díaz-Cambronero, Óscar Belda, Javier Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dormann, Dirk Dehnhardt, Tamara Hernandez-Gonzalez, Martin Schmier, Sonja de Korte, Dianne Plani, Frank Buhre, Wolfgang Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Trauma may be associated with significant to life-threatening blood loss, which in turn may increase the risk of complications and death, particularly in the absence of adequate treatment. Hydroxyethyl starch (HES) solutions are used for volume therapy to treat hypovolemia due to acute blood loss to maintain or re-establish hemodynamic stability with the ultimate goal to avoid organ hypoperfusion and cardiovascular collapse. The current study compares a 6% HES 130 solution (Volulyte 6%) versus an electrolyte solution (Ionolyte) for volume replacement therapy in adult patients with traumatic injuries, as requested by the European Medicines Agency to gain more insights into the safety and efficacy of HES in the setting of trauma care. METHODS: TETHYS is a pragmatic, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multicenter, multinational trial performed in two parallel groups. Eligible consenting adults ≥ 18 years, with an estimated blood loss of ≥ 500 ml, and in whom initial surgery is deemed necessary within 24 h after blunt or penetrating trauma, will be randomized to receive intravenous treatment at an individualized dose with either a 6% HES 130, or an electrolyte solution, for a maximum of 24 h or until reaching the maximum daily dose of 30 ml/kg body weight, whatever occurs first. Sample size is estimated as 175 patients per group, 350 patients total (α = 0.025 one-tailed, power 1–β = 0.8). Composite primary endpoint evaluated in an exploratory manner will be 90-day mortality and 90-day renal failure, defined as AKIN stage ≥ 2, RIFLE injury/failure stage, or use of renal replacement therapy (RRT) during the first 3 months. Secondary efficacy and safety endpoints are fluid administration and balance, changes in vital signs and hemodynamic status, changes in laboratory parameters including renal function, coagulation, and inflammation biomarkers, incidence of adverse events during treatment period, hospital, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, fitness for ICU or hospital discharge, and duration of mechanical ventilation and/or RRT. DISCUSSION: This pragmatic study will increase the evidence on safety and efficacy of 6% HES 130 for treatment of hypovolemia secondary to acute blood loss in trauma patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registered in EudraCT, No.: 2016-002176-27 (21 April 2017) and ClinicalTrials.gov, ID: NCT03338218 (09 November 2017). BioMed Central 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9164328/ /pubmed/35655234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06390-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Palma, Clementina Duran Mamba, Musawenkosi Geldenhuys, Johan Fadahun, Oluwafolajimi Rossaint, Rolf Zacharowski, Kai Brand, Martin Díaz-Cambronero, Óscar Belda, Javier Westphal, Martin Brauer, Ute Dormann, Dirk Dehnhardt, Tamara Hernandez-Gonzalez, Martin Schmier, Sonja de Korte, Dianne Plani, Frank Buhre, Wolfgang PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study |
title | PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study |
title_full | PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study |
title_fullStr | PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study |
title_full_unstemmed | PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study |
title_short | PragmaTic, prospEctive, randomized, controlled, double-blind, mulTi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% HydroxYethyl Starch (HES) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the TETHYS study |
title_sort | pragmatic, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind, multi-centre, multinational study on the safety and efficacy of a 6% hydroxyethyl starch (hes) solution versus an electrolyte solution in trauma patients: study protocol for the tethys study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164328/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06390-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT palmaclementinaduran pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT mambamusawenkosi pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT geldenhuysjohan pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT fadahunoluwafolajimi pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT rossaintrolf pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT zacharowskikai pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT brandmartin pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT diazcambronerooscar pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT beldajavier pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT westphalmartin pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT brauerute pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT dormanndirk pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT dehnhardttamara pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT hernandezgonzalezmartin pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT schmiersonja pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT dekortedianne pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT planifrank pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy AT buhrewolfgang pragmaticprospectiverandomizedcontrolleddoubleblindmulticentremultinationalstudyonthesafetyandefficacyofa6hydroxyethylstarchhessolutionversusanelectrolytesolutionintraumapatientsstudyprotocolforthetethysstudy |