Cargando…

Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Patients with lower limb fracture often have acute pain and discomfort from changes in position, and such pain affects early postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus bloc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Yuting, Song, Jie, Xia, Xiaoqiong, Hu, Xianwen, Li, Yawen, Yu, Yongbo, Wang, Liang, Tao, Zhiguo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01710-9
_version_ 1784720129796341760
author Xu, Yuting
Song, Jie
Xia, Xiaoqiong
Hu, Xianwen
Li, Yawen
Yu, Yongbo
Wang, Liang
Tao, Zhiguo
author_facet Xu, Yuting
Song, Jie
Xia, Xiaoqiong
Hu, Xianwen
Li, Yawen
Yu, Yongbo
Wang, Liang
Tao, Zhiguo
author_sort Xu, Yuting
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with lower limb fracture often have acute pain and discomfort from changes in position, and such pain affects early postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery. METHODS: We included 126 patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture who were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and underwent LSPB guided by ultrasound combined with a nerve stimulator in the supine and lateral positions, respectively. The primary outcome was the dose of sufentanil used in surgery. The secondary outcomes were the maximum VAS (visual analogue scale) pain score at position placing for LSPB, the time of position placing, the time for nerve block,the number of puncture attempts,the haemodynamic indicators, the VAS score at 1, 12, and 24 h following surgery, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia and adverse events related to nerve block. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in dose of sufentanil used between the two groups(P = 0.142). The maximum VAS pain score at position placing(P < 0.01), the time of position placement(P < 0.01), the time for lumbar plexus block and the time of puncture attempts were significantly lower in the S group than in the L group (P < 0.01). However, the time for sacral plexus block was higher in the S group than in the L group (P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in haemodynamic indicators,number of puncture attempts for the sacral plexus, postoperative VAS scores, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia or adverse events related to nerve block between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a more comfortable and better accepted anaesthetic regimen for patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery. LSPB in the supine position is simple to apply and has definite anaesthetic effects. Additionally, it has a high level of postoperative analgesia and therefore should be widely applied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrolment at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (Date:11/03/2021 Number: ChiCTR2100044117). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01710-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9164414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91644142022-06-05 Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial Xu, Yuting Song, Jie Xia, Xiaoqiong Hu, Xianwen Li, Yawen Yu, Yongbo Wang, Liang Tao, Zhiguo BMC Anesthesiol Research BACKGROUND: Patients with lower limb fracture often have acute pain and discomfort from changes in position, and such pain affects early postoperative recovery. This study aimed to compare the applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block (LSPB) in the supine versus lateral position during lower limb fracture surgery. METHODS: We included 126 patients who underwent elective internal fixation for lower limb fracture who were divided into the S group and the L group by the random number table method and underwent LSPB guided by ultrasound combined with a nerve stimulator in the supine and lateral positions, respectively. The primary outcome was the dose of sufentanil used in surgery. The secondary outcomes were the maximum VAS (visual analogue scale) pain score at position placing for LSPB, the time of position placing, the time for nerve block,the number of puncture attempts,the haemodynamic indicators, the VAS score at 1, 12, and 24 h following surgery, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia and adverse events related to nerve block. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference in dose of sufentanil used between the two groups(P = 0.142). The maximum VAS pain score at position placing(P < 0.01), the time of position placement(P < 0.01), the time for lumbar plexus block and the time of puncture attempts were significantly lower in the S group than in the L group (P < 0.01). However, the time for sacral plexus block was higher in the S group than in the L group (P = 0.029). There was no significant difference in haemodynamic indicators,number of puncture attempts for the sacral plexus, postoperative VAS scores, postoperative satisfactory degree to analgesia or adverse events related to nerve block between the two groups (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a more comfortable and better accepted anaesthetic regimen for patients undergoing lower limb fracture surgery. LSPB in the supine position is simple to apply and has definite anaesthetic effects. Additionally, it has a high level of postoperative analgesia and therefore should be widely applied. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial was registered prior to patient enrolment at the Chinese Clinical Trail Registry (Date:11/03/2021 Number: ChiCTR2100044117). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12871-022-01710-9. BioMed Central 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9164414/ /pubmed/35659181 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01710-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Xu, Yuting
Song, Jie
Xia, Xiaoqiong
Hu, Xianwen
Li, Yawen
Yu, Yongbo
Wang, Liang
Tao, Zhiguo
Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial
title Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort applicability and effectiveness of ultrasound combined with nerve stimulator-guided lumbosacral plexus block in the supine versus lateral position during surgeries for lower limb fracture-a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659181
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-022-01710-9
work_keys_str_mv AT xuyuting applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT songjie applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiaxiaoqiong applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huxianwen applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liyawen applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yuyongbo applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT wangliang applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT taozhiguo applicabilityandeffectivenessofultrasoundcombinedwithnervestimulatorguidedlumbosacralplexusblockinthesupineversuslateralpositionduringsurgeriesforlowerlimbfractureaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial