Cargando…

The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among women smokers in low socio-economic status (SES) groups or women living in disadvantaged areas who are historically underserved by smoking cessation services. METHODS: A systema...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O’Connell, Nicola, Burke, Emma, Dobbie, Fiona, Dougall, Nadine, Mockler, David, Darker, Catherine, Vance, Joanne, Bernstein, Steven, Gilbert, Hazel, Bauld, Linda, Hayes, Catherine B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7
_version_ 1784720131078750208
author O’Connell, Nicola
Burke, Emma
Dobbie, Fiona
Dougall, Nadine
Mockler, David
Darker, Catherine
Vance, Joanne
Bernstein, Steven
Gilbert, Hazel
Bauld, Linda
Hayes, Catherine B.
author_facet O’Connell, Nicola
Burke, Emma
Dobbie, Fiona
Dougall, Nadine
Mockler, David
Darker, Catherine
Vance, Joanne
Bernstein, Steven
Gilbert, Hazel
Bauld, Linda
Hayes, Catherine B.
author_sort O’Connell, Nicola
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among women smokers in low socio-economic status (SES) groups or women living in disadvantaged areas who are historically underserved by smoking cessation services. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials of any smoking cessation intervention among women in low SES groups or living in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. A random effects meta-analysis assessed effectiveness of interventions on smoking cessation. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The GRADE approach established certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 396 studies were screened for eligibility and 11 (6153 female participants) were included. Seven studies targeted women-only. 5/11 tested a form of face-to-face support. A pooled effect size was estimated in 10/11 studies. At end of treatment, two-thirds more low SES women who received a smoking cessation intervention were more likely to stop smoking than women in control groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.36–2.08, I(2)= 34%). The effect was reduced but remained significant when longest available follow-up periods were pooled (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04–1.48, I(2) = 0%). There was moderate-to-high risk of bias in most studies. Certainty of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural and behavioural + pharmacotherapy interventions for smoking cessation targeting women in low SES groups or women living in areas of disadvantage were effective in the short term. However, longer follow-up periods indicated reduced effectiveness. Future studies to explore ways to prevent smoking relapse in this population are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42019130160 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9164420
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91644202022-06-05 The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis O’Connell, Nicola Burke, Emma Dobbie, Fiona Dougall, Nadine Mockler, David Darker, Catherine Vance, Joanne Bernstein, Steven Gilbert, Hazel Bauld, Linda Hayes, Catherine B. Syst Rev Research INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among women smokers in low socio-economic status (SES) groups or women living in disadvantaged areas who are historically underserved by smoking cessation services. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials of any smoking cessation intervention among women in low SES groups or living in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. A random effects meta-analysis assessed effectiveness of interventions on smoking cessation. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The GRADE approach established certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 396 studies were screened for eligibility and 11 (6153 female participants) were included. Seven studies targeted women-only. 5/11 tested a form of face-to-face support. A pooled effect size was estimated in 10/11 studies. At end of treatment, two-thirds more low SES women who received a smoking cessation intervention were more likely to stop smoking than women in control groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.36–2.08, I(2)= 34%). The effect was reduced but remained significant when longest available follow-up periods were pooled (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04–1.48, I(2) = 0%). There was moderate-to-high risk of bias in most studies. Certainty of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural and behavioural + pharmacotherapy interventions for smoking cessation targeting women in low SES groups or women living in areas of disadvantage were effective in the short term. However, longer follow-up periods indicated reduced effectiveness. Future studies to explore ways to prevent smoking relapse in this population are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42019130160 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7. BioMed Central 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9164420/ /pubmed/35655281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
O’Connell, Nicola
Burke, Emma
Dobbie, Fiona
Dougall, Nadine
Mockler, David
Darker, Catherine
Vance, Joanne
Bernstein, Steven
Gilbert, Hazel
Bauld, Linda
Hayes, Catherine B.
The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164420/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655281
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnellnicola theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT burkeemma theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dobbiefiona theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dougallnadine theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mocklerdavid theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT darkercatherine theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vancejoanne theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bernsteinsteven theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gilberthazel theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bauldlinda theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hayescatherineb theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT oconnellnicola effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT burkeemma effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dobbiefiona effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT dougallnadine effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mocklerdavid effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT darkercatherine effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vancejoanne effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bernsteinsteven effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gilberthazel effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bauldlinda effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT hayescatherineb effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis