Cargando…
The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among women smokers in low socio-economic status (SES) groups or women living in disadvantaged areas who are historically underserved by smoking cessation services. METHODS: A systema...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7 |
_version_ | 1784720131078750208 |
---|---|
author | O’Connell, Nicola Burke, Emma Dobbie, Fiona Dougall, Nadine Mockler, David Darker, Catherine Vance, Joanne Bernstein, Steven Gilbert, Hazel Bauld, Linda Hayes, Catherine B. |
author_facet | O’Connell, Nicola Burke, Emma Dobbie, Fiona Dougall, Nadine Mockler, David Darker, Catherine Vance, Joanne Bernstein, Steven Gilbert, Hazel Bauld, Linda Hayes, Catherine B. |
author_sort | O’Connell, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among women smokers in low socio-economic status (SES) groups or women living in disadvantaged areas who are historically underserved by smoking cessation services. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials of any smoking cessation intervention among women in low SES groups or living in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. A random effects meta-analysis assessed effectiveness of interventions on smoking cessation. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The GRADE approach established certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 396 studies were screened for eligibility and 11 (6153 female participants) were included. Seven studies targeted women-only. 5/11 tested a form of face-to-face support. A pooled effect size was estimated in 10/11 studies. At end of treatment, two-thirds more low SES women who received a smoking cessation intervention were more likely to stop smoking than women in control groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.36–2.08, I(2)= 34%). The effect was reduced but remained significant when longest available follow-up periods were pooled (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04–1.48, I(2) = 0%). There was moderate-to-high risk of bias in most studies. Certainty of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural and behavioural + pharmacotherapy interventions for smoking cessation targeting women in low SES groups or women living in areas of disadvantage were effective in the short term. However, longer follow-up periods indicated reduced effectiveness. Future studies to explore ways to prevent smoking relapse in this population are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42019130160 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9164420 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91644202022-06-05 The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis O’Connell, Nicola Burke, Emma Dobbie, Fiona Dougall, Nadine Mockler, David Darker, Catherine Vance, Joanne Bernstein, Steven Gilbert, Hazel Bauld, Linda Hayes, Catherine B. Syst Rev Research INTRODUCTION: This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions among women smokers in low socio-economic status (SES) groups or women living in disadvantaged areas who are historically underserved by smoking cessation services. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, PsychINFO and Web of Science databases. Eligibility criteria included randomised controlled trials of any smoking cessation intervention among women in low SES groups or living in socio-economically disadvantaged areas. A random effects meta-analysis assessed effectiveness of interventions on smoking cessation. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The GRADE approach established certainty of evidence. RESULTS: A total of 396 studies were screened for eligibility and 11 (6153 female participants) were included. Seven studies targeted women-only. 5/11 tested a form of face-to-face support. A pooled effect size was estimated in 10/11 studies. At end of treatment, two-thirds more low SES women who received a smoking cessation intervention were more likely to stop smoking than women in control groups (risk ratio (RR) 1.68, 95% CI 1.36–2.08, I(2)= 34%). The effect was reduced but remained significant when longest available follow-up periods were pooled (RR 1.23, 95% CI 1.04–1.48, I(2) = 0%). There was moderate-to-high risk of bias in most studies. Certainty of evidence was low. CONCLUSIONS: Behavioural and behavioural + pharmacotherapy interventions for smoking cessation targeting women in low SES groups or women living in areas of disadvantage were effective in the short term. However, longer follow-up periods indicated reduced effectiveness. Future studies to explore ways to prevent smoking relapse in this population are needed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: CRD42019130160 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7. BioMed Central 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9164420/ /pubmed/35655281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research O’Connell, Nicola Burke, Emma Dobbie, Fiona Dougall, Nadine Mockler, David Darker, Catherine Vance, Joanne Bernstein, Steven Gilbert, Hazel Bauld, Linda Hayes, Catherine B. The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of smoking cessation interventions for socio-economically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164420/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35655281 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01922-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oconnellnicola theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT burkeemma theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dobbiefiona theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dougallnadine theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mocklerdavid theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT darkercatherine theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vancejoanne theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bernsteinsteven theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gilberthazel theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bauldlinda theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hayescatherineb theeffectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT oconnellnicola effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT burkeemma effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dobbiefiona effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT dougallnadine effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT mocklerdavid effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT darkercatherine effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vancejoanne effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bernsteinsteven effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT gilberthazel effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT bauldlinda effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT hayescatherineb effectivenessofsmokingcessationinterventionsforsocioeconomicallydisadvantagedwomenasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |