Cargando…

SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs

The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify infected people. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (mean = 27 tests/100,000 people/day). We simulated COVID-19...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Alvin X., Toporowski, Amy, Sacks, Jilian A., Perkins, Mark D., Briand, Sylvie, van Kerkhove, Maria, Hannay, Emma, Carmona, Sergio, Rodriguez, Bill, Parker, Edyth, Nichols, Brooke E., Russell, Colin A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.20.22275319
_version_ 1784720137428926464
author Han, Alvin X.
Toporowski, Amy
Sacks, Jilian A.
Perkins, Mark D.
Briand, Sylvie
van Kerkhove, Maria
Hannay, Emma
Carmona, Sergio
Rodriguez, Bill
Parker, Edyth
Nichols, Brooke E.
Russell, Colin A.
author_facet Han, Alvin X.
Toporowski, Amy
Sacks, Jilian A.
Perkins, Mark D.
Briand, Sylvie
van Kerkhove, Maria
Hannay, Emma
Carmona, Sergio
Rodriguez, Bill
Parker, Edyth
Nichols, Brooke E.
Russell, Colin A.
author_sort Han, Alvin X.
collection PubMed
description The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify infected people. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (mean = 27 tests/100,000 people/day). We simulated COVID-19 epidemics in a prototypical LMIC to investigate how testing rates, sampling strategies, and sequencing proportions jointly impact surveillance outcomes and showed that low testing rates and spatiotemporal biases delay time-to-detection of new variants by weeks-to-months and can lead to unreliable estimates of variant prevalence even when the proportion of samples sequenced is increased. Accordingly, investments in wider access to diagnostics to support testing rates of ~100 tests/100,000 people/day could enable more timely detection of new variants and reliable estimates of variant prevalence. The performance of global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance programs is fundamentally limited by access to diagnostic testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9164450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91644502022-12-15 SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs Han, Alvin X. Toporowski, Amy Sacks, Jilian A. Perkins, Mark D. Briand, Sylvie van Kerkhove, Maria Hannay, Emma Carmona, Sergio Rodriguez, Bill Parker, Edyth Nichols, Brooke E. Russell, Colin A. medRxiv Article The first step in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance is testing to identify infected people. However, global testing rates are falling as we emerge from the acute health emergency and remain low in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) (mean = 27 tests/100,000 people/day). We simulated COVID-19 epidemics in a prototypical LMIC to investigate how testing rates, sampling strategies, and sequencing proportions jointly impact surveillance outcomes and showed that low testing rates and spatiotemporal biases delay time-to-detection of new variants by weeks-to-months and can lead to unreliable estimates of variant prevalence even when the proportion of samples sequenced is increased. Accordingly, investments in wider access to diagnostics to support testing rates of ~100 tests/100,000 people/day could enable more timely detection of new variants and reliable estimates of variant prevalence. The performance of global SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance programs is fundamentally limited by access to diagnostic testing. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory 2022-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC9164450/ /pubmed/35664998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.20.22275319 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which allows reusers to copy and distribute the material in any medium or format in unadapted form only, for noncommercial purposes only, and only so long as attribution is given to the creator.
spellingShingle Article
Han, Alvin X.
Toporowski, Amy
Sacks, Jilian A.
Perkins, Mark D.
Briand, Sylvie
van Kerkhove, Maria
Hannay, Emma
Carmona, Sergio
Rodriguez, Bill
Parker, Edyth
Nichols, Brooke E.
Russell, Colin A.
SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_full SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_fullStr SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_full_unstemmed SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_short SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
title_sort sars-cov-2 diagnostic testing rates determine the sensitivity of genomic surveillance programs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35664998
http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.20.22275319
work_keys_str_mv AT hanalvinx sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT toporowskiamy sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT sacksjiliana sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT perkinsmarkd sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT briandsylvie sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT vankerkhovemaria sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT hannayemma sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT carmonasergio sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT rodriguezbill sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT parkeredyth sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT nicholsbrookee sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms
AT russellcolina sarscov2diagnostictestingratesdeterminethesensitivityofgenomicsurveillanceprograms