Cargando…

The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability

Rigorous evidence is vital in all disciplines to ensure efficient, appropriate, and fit-for-purpose decision-making with minimised risk of unintended harm. To date, however, disciplines have been slow to share evidence synthesis frameworks, best practices, and tools amongst one another. Recent progr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haddaway, Neal R., Bannach-Brown, Alexandra, Grainger, Matthew J., Hamilton, W. Kyle, Hennessy, Emily A., Keenan, Ciara, Pritchard, Chris C., Stojanova, Jana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01985-6
_version_ 1784720138680926208
author Haddaway, Neal R.
Bannach-Brown, Alexandra
Grainger, Matthew J.
Hamilton, W. Kyle
Hennessy, Emily A.
Keenan, Ciara
Pritchard, Chris C.
Stojanova, Jana
author_facet Haddaway, Neal R.
Bannach-Brown, Alexandra
Grainger, Matthew J.
Hamilton, W. Kyle
Hennessy, Emily A.
Keenan, Ciara
Pritchard, Chris C.
Stojanova, Jana
author_sort Haddaway, Neal R.
collection PubMed
description Rigorous evidence is vital in all disciplines to ensure efficient, appropriate, and fit-for-purpose decision-making with minimised risk of unintended harm. To date, however, disciplines have been slow to share evidence synthesis frameworks, best practices, and tools amongst one another. Recent progress in collaborative digital and programmatic frameworks, such as the free and Open Source software R, have significantly expanded the opportunities for development of free-to-use, incrementally improvable, community driven tools to support evidence synthesis (e.g. EviAtlas, robvis, PRISMA2020 flow diagrams and metadat). Despite this, evidence synthesis (and meta-analysis) practitioners and methodologists who make use of R remain relatively disconnected from one another. Here, we report on a new virtual conference for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in the R programming environment (ESMARConf) that aims to connect these communities. By designing an entirely free and online conference from scratch, we have been able to focus efforts on maximising accessibility and equity—making these core missions for our new community of practice. As a community of practice, ESMARConf builds on the success and groundwork of the broader R community and systematic review coordinating bodies (e.g. Cochrane), but fills an important niche. ESMARConf aims to maximise accessibility and equity of participants across regions, contexts, and social backgrounds, forging a level playing field in a digital, connected, and online future of evidence synthesis. We believe that everyone should have the same access to participation and involvement, and we believe ESMARConf provides a vital opportunity to push for equitability across disciplines, regions, and personal situations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9164457
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91644572022-06-05 The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability Haddaway, Neal R. Bannach-Brown, Alexandra Grainger, Matthew J. Hamilton, W. Kyle Hennessy, Emily A. Keenan, Ciara Pritchard, Chris C. Stojanova, Jana Syst Rev Commentary Rigorous evidence is vital in all disciplines to ensure efficient, appropriate, and fit-for-purpose decision-making with minimised risk of unintended harm. To date, however, disciplines have been slow to share evidence synthesis frameworks, best practices, and tools amongst one another. Recent progress in collaborative digital and programmatic frameworks, such as the free and Open Source software R, have significantly expanded the opportunities for development of free-to-use, incrementally improvable, community driven tools to support evidence synthesis (e.g. EviAtlas, robvis, PRISMA2020 flow diagrams and metadat). Despite this, evidence synthesis (and meta-analysis) practitioners and methodologists who make use of R remain relatively disconnected from one another. Here, we report on a new virtual conference for evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in the R programming environment (ESMARConf) that aims to connect these communities. By designing an entirely free and online conference from scratch, we have been able to focus efforts on maximising accessibility and equity—making these core missions for our new community of practice. As a community of practice, ESMARConf builds on the success and groundwork of the broader R community and systematic review coordinating bodies (e.g. Cochrane), but fills an important niche. ESMARConf aims to maximise accessibility and equity of participants across regions, contexts, and social backgrounds, forging a level playing field in a digital, connected, and online future of evidence synthesis. We believe that everyone should have the same access to participation and involvement, and we believe ESMARConf provides a vital opportunity to push for equitability across disciplines, regions, and personal situations. BioMed Central 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9164457/ /pubmed/35659294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01985-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Haddaway, Neal R.
Bannach-Brown, Alexandra
Grainger, Matthew J.
Hamilton, W. Kyle
Hennessy, Emily A.
Keenan, Ciara
Pritchard, Chris C.
Stojanova, Jana
The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability
title The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability
title_full The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability
title_fullStr The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability
title_full_unstemmed The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability
title_short The evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in R conference (ESMARConf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability
title_sort evidence synthesis and meta-analysis in r conference (esmarconf): levelling the playing field of conference accessibility and equitability
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164457/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35659294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-022-01985-6
work_keys_str_mv AT haddawaynealr theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT bannachbrownalexandra theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT graingermatthewj theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT hamiltonwkyle theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT hennessyemilya theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT keenanciara theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT pritchardchrisc theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT stojanovajana theevidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT haddawaynealr evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT bannachbrownalexandra evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT graingermatthewj evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT hamiltonwkyle evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT hennessyemilya evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT keenanciara evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT pritchardchrisc evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability
AT stojanovajana evidencesynthesisandmetaanalysisinrconferenceesmarconflevellingtheplayingfieldofconferenceaccessibilityandequitability