Cargando…
EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience
AIM: To assess the toxicities and early clinical outcomes in patients of primary and recurrent ependymomas treated with image guided pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2019- December 2021, we analyzed consecutive patients of ependymomas treated...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164650/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.158 |
_version_ | 1784720185205194752 |
---|---|
author | Sudarsan, Rishan Thimma Chilukuri, Srinivas Noufal, M P Adhithyan, R Uppuluri, Ramya Panda, Pankaj Kumar Patil, Sushma Sharma, Dayananda Roopesh Kumar, V R Jalali, Rakesh |
author_facet | Sudarsan, Rishan Thimma Chilukuri, Srinivas Noufal, M P Adhithyan, R Uppuluri, Ramya Panda, Pankaj Kumar Patil, Sushma Sharma, Dayananda Roopesh Kumar, V R Jalali, Rakesh |
author_sort | Sudarsan, Rishan Thimma |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To assess the toxicities and early clinical outcomes in patients of primary and recurrent ependymomas treated with image guided pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2019- December 2021, we analyzed consecutive patients of ependymomas treated with image guided PBS-PBT. They were also analyzed molecularly, and all recurrent/re-irradiated patients were considered for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Acute toxicities were assessed based on NCI CTC v5.0, local control and radiological response by 3-monthly MRI post therapy. RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive patients with ependymoma (13 Grade III and 4 Grade II) (median age-9 years) were analyzed. 9 patients were primary, 7 were treated at first recurrence and 1 at second recurrence. Majority had posterior fossa (PF) tumors (12) followed by supratentorial (ST) (3) and spine (2). Among PF ependymomas, 10 had global loss of H3K27me3, whereas amongst ST, 1 had YAP1 fusion, 1 had L1CAM positivity and other, negative L1CAM and p65/RELA on immunohistochemistry. Gross/near-total resection was achieved in 87% patients. Primary ependymomas were treated with focal radiotherapy; and among recurrent cases, 7 received CSI followed by primary site boost to a total median dose of 55CGE (50.2-55.8CGE). Grade 2 dermatitis, grade 2 and 3 hematological toxicities (CSI) were noted in 3,2 and 2 patients respectively. Grade 2 fatigue noted in 53% of all and 71% receiving CSI. With a median follow-up of 10 months (2-24 months), local control (LC) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 87.5% (primary-100%, recurrent-75%) and overall survival (OS) was 94% (primary-100%, recurrent-88%). CONCLUSION: Our experience of treating patients of ependymoma with complete resection followed by PBS-PBT including CSI is encouraging with low acute toxicities. Recurrent/molecularly aggressive cases may be considered for CSI. Keywords: PT, proton beam therapy, ependymomas, primary and recurrent |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9164650 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91646502022-06-05 EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience Sudarsan, Rishan Thimma Chilukuri, Srinivas Noufal, M P Adhithyan, R Uppuluri, Ramya Panda, Pankaj Kumar Patil, Sushma Sharma, Dayananda Roopesh Kumar, V R Jalali, Rakesh Neuro Oncol Ependymoma AIM: To assess the toxicities and early clinical outcomes in patients of primary and recurrent ependymomas treated with image guided pencil beam scanning proton beam therapy (PBS-PBT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2019- December 2021, we analyzed consecutive patients of ependymomas treated with image guided PBS-PBT. They were also analyzed molecularly, and all recurrent/re-irradiated patients were considered for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). Acute toxicities were assessed based on NCI CTC v5.0, local control and radiological response by 3-monthly MRI post therapy. RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive patients with ependymoma (13 Grade III and 4 Grade II) (median age-9 years) were analyzed. 9 patients were primary, 7 were treated at first recurrence and 1 at second recurrence. Majority had posterior fossa (PF) tumors (12) followed by supratentorial (ST) (3) and spine (2). Among PF ependymomas, 10 had global loss of H3K27me3, whereas amongst ST, 1 had YAP1 fusion, 1 had L1CAM positivity and other, negative L1CAM and p65/RELA on immunohistochemistry. Gross/near-total resection was achieved in 87% patients. Primary ependymomas were treated with focal radiotherapy; and among recurrent cases, 7 received CSI followed by primary site boost to a total median dose of 55CGE (50.2-55.8CGE). Grade 2 dermatitis, grade 2 and 3 hematological toxicities (CSI) were noted in 3,2 and 2 patients respectively. Grade 2 fatigue noted in 53% of all and 71% receiving CSI. With a median follow-up of 10 months (2-24 months), local control (LC) and disease-free survival (DFS) was 87.5% (primary-100%, recurrent-75%) and overall survival (OS) was 94% (primary-100%, recurrent-88%). CONCLUSION: Our experience of treating patients of ependymoma with complete resection followed by PBS-PBT including CSI is encouraging with low acute toxicities. Recurrent/molecularly aggressive cases may be considered for CSI. Keywords: PT, proton beam therapy, ependymomas, primary and recurrent Oxford University Press 2022-06-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9164650/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.158 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Ependymoma Sudarsan, Rishan Thimma Chilukuri, Srinivas Noufal, M P Adhithyan, R Uppuluri, Ramya Panda, Pankaj Kumar Patil, Sushma Sharma, Dayananda Roopesh Kumar, V R Jalali, Rakesh EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience |
title | EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience |
title_full | EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience |
title_fullStr | EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience |
title_full_unstemmed | EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience |
title_short | EPEN-22. Molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with Image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient Indian experience |
title_sort | epen-22. molecularly aggressive ependymomas treated with image guided pencil beam proton therapy: consecutive patient indian experience |
topic | Ependymoma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9164650/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noac079.158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sudarsanrishanthimma epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT chilukurisrinivas epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT noufalmp epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT adhithyanr epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT uppuluriramya epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT pandapankajkumar epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT patilsushma epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT sharmadayananda epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT roopeshkumarvr epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience AT jalalirakesh epen22molecularlyaggressiveependymomastreatedwithimageguidedpencilbeamprotontherapyconsecutivepatientindianexperience |